Tobias Hecht

Mr. Tobias Hecht

Chair of Ergonomics, Technical University of Munich
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 September 2018 in Cognition, Technology & Work
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AFAnna Feldhütter
Anna Feldhütter
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
LKLuis Kalb
Luis Kalb
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler

14 August 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
EDEmilia Darlagiannis
Emilia Darlagiannis
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler

25 July 2019
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
AFAnna Feldhütter
Anna Feldhütter
KDKathrin Draeger
Kathrin Draeger
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler

5 August 2018
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
AFAnna Feldhütter
Anna Feldhütter
JRJonas Radlmayr
Jonas Radlmayr
YNYasuhiko Nakano
Yasuhiko Nakano
YMYoshikuni Miki
Yoshikuni Miki
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler

30 January 2020 in Information
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
SKStefan Kratzert
Stefan Kratzert
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler
Automated driving research as a key topic in the automotive industry is currently undergoing change. Research is shifting from unexpected and time-critical take-over situations to human machine interface (HMI) design for predictable transitions. Furthermore, new applications like automated city driving are getting more attention and the ability to engage in non-driving related activities (NDRA) starting from SAE Level 3 automation poses new questions to HMI design. Moreover, future introduction scenarios and automated capabilities are still unclear. Thus, we designed, executed, and assessed a driving simulator study focusing on the effect of different transition frequencies and a predictive HMI while freely engaging in naturalistic NDRA. In the study with 33 participants, we found transition frequency to have effects on workload and acceptance, as well as a small impact on the usability evaluation of the system. Trust, however, was not affected. The predictive HMI was used and accepted, as can be seen by eye-tracking data and the post-study questionnaire, but could not mitigate the above-mentioned negative effects induced by transition frequency. Most attractive activities were window gazing, chatting, phone use, and reading magazines. Descriptively, window gazing and chatting gained attractiveness when interrupted more often, while reading magazines and playing games were negatively affected by transition rate.

23 April 2022 in Applied Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
THTobias Hecht
Tobias Hecht
SWStefanie Weng
Stefanie Weng
LKLuca-Felix Kick
Luca-Felix Kick
KBKlaus Bengler
Klaus Bengler