The wave-making characteristics and resistance performance of a naval vessel are fundamental to its hydrodynamic design, directly impacting its speed, stealth, and energy efficiency. To reveal the performance trade-offs inherent in different design philosophies, a systematic comparative study on the hydrodynamic performance of two representative mainstream naval destroyers from China and the United States was conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Full-scale three-dimensional models of both vessels were established based on publicly available data. Their flow fields in calm water were numerically simulated at both economical (18 knots) and maximum (30 knots) speeds using an unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver, the Volume of Fluid (VOF) method for free-surface capturing, and the SST k-ω turbulence model. The performance differences were meticulously compared through qualitative observation of wave patterns, quantitative measurements (such as the transverse width of the wave-making region), and analysis of resistance data. Numerical results indicated that the wave-making generated by the vessel of the United States was more pronounced during steady navigation. To validate the reliability of the CFD results, supplementary towing tank tests were performed using a small-scale model (1.1 m in length) of the vessel from China. The test speed (1.5 m/s) was scaled to correspond to the full-scale ship speed through dimensional analysis. The experimental data showed good agreement with the simulation results, jointly confirming the aforementioned performance trade-off. This study clearly demonstrates that, at the economic speed, the design of the mainstream vessel from China tends to prioritize superior wave stealth performance at the expense of higher resistance, whereas the mainstream vessel from the U.S. exhibits the characteristics of lower resistance coupled with more significant wave-making features. These findings provide an important theoretical basis and data support for the future multi-objective optimization design of surface vessels concerning stealth, speed, and comprehensive energy efficiency.

Existing studies mainly address single launch configurations and provide limited comparison across thrust levels, engine layouts, and launch altitudes. This study establishes a CFD framework coupling rocket dynamics, the VOF multiphase model, overset mesh, and dynamic mesh techniques to simulate three sub-scale offshore launch variants. Five transient stages are identified from free-jet development to plume detachment. The results show that jet stagnation pressure excavates a water cavity, promotes reverse entrainment of high-enthalpy gas near the rocket base, and produces configuration-dependent drag recovery. Type B requires a higher initial launch height to avoid strong plumewater coupling, whereas Types A and C allow lower preliminary height windows when drag benefit and thermal recirculation risk are balanced.