Weixin Zhao

Dr. Weixin Zhao

Aalto University, Espoo, Uusimaa, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2021 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Weixin ZhaoWeixin Zhao
Weixin Zhao
SKSimo Kilpeläinen
Simo Kilpeläinen
RKRisto Kosonen
Risto Kosonen
JJJuha Jokisalo
Juha Jokisalo
SLSami Lestinen
Sami Lestinen
PMPanu Mustakallio
Panu Mustakallio


9 April 2024 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Weixin ZhaoWeixin Zhao
Weixin Zhao
SLSami Lestinen
Sami Lestinen
MGMiao Guo
Miao Guo
SKSimo Kilpeläinen
Simo Kilpeläinen
JJJuha Jokisalo
Juha Jokisalo
Risto KosonenRisto Kosonen
Risto Kosonen

4 May 2020 in Indoor and Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Weixin ZhaoWeixin Zhao
Weixin Zhao
SKSimo Kilpeläinen
Simo Kilpeläinen
Risto KosonenRisto Kosonen
Risto Kosonen
JJJuha Jokisalo
Juha Jokisalo
In this study, the performance of a micro-environment system was analysed and compared with diffused ceiling ventilation. In the analysed micro-environment low velocity radiant panel system, two low velocity units and radiant panels were installed above workstations to supply directly clean air to occupants and to cover the cooling power required. With diffused ceiling ventilation, all cooling demand is covered with air and thus, the airflow rate required is higher than with low velocity radiant panel system. The varied heat gain from 40 to 80 W/m 2 consists of two seated dummies, laptops, monitors and simulated solar gain. The results show that with perimeter exhaust and local supply air, 8–13% reduction of the total cooling load required is possible, in comparison to the standard mixing systems. The average exhaust temperature was 0.7–1.9°C higher than average room air temperature at the workstation. Moreover, the mean air temperature with the low velocity radiant panel system at the occupied zone was 0.6°C lower than with diffused ceiling ventilation. With low velocity radiant panel system, the air velocity was less than 0.12 m/s in the occupied zone. Also, the draught rate was less than 10%. Furthermore, the air change efficiency with the low velocity radiant panel system was over 70% which is better than 44–49% efficiency with diffused ceiling ventilation.

26 April 2020 in Indoor and Built Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Weixin ZhaoWeixin Zhao
Weixin Zhao
SLSami Lestinen
Sami Lestinen
SKSimo Kilpeläinen
Simo Kilpeläinen
RKRisto Kosonen
Risto Kosonen
The influence of occupants'’ movements should be considered when analysing local thermal comfort. This study presents the effect of human movement on airflow characteristics and local thermal conditions with diffuse ceiling ventilation by experimental studies. A simulated person moving was used to study the human movement in an office. In these experiments, three moving speeds were studied: 0.3, 0.6 and 1.0 m/s. The simulated person moved in four cycle patterns: continuous moving and with 5 s, 10 s and 15 s interval breaks between each turn. Three heat gain levels of 40, 60 and 80 W/m 2 were evaluated in the chamber. The results indicate that the human movement decreased vertical temperature gradient compared with the steady-state condition. Instead, the moving intervals would have no effect on the vertical air temperature gradient. The power spectral density was increased by 90% due to the person movement compared with the steady-state condition. The moving person would create different micro-environments close to work stations than close to the moving area.

27 August 2022 in Buildings
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Weixin ZhaoWeixin Zhao
Weixin Zhao
PMPanu Mustakallio
Panu Mustakallio
SLSami Lestinen
Sami Lestinen
SKSimo Kilpeläinen
Simo Kilpeläinen
JJJuha Jokisalo
Juha Jokisalo
Risto KosonenRisto Kosonen
Risto Kosonen
One main challenge of air distribution in classrooms is to guarantee ventilation performance under different usage conditions. In this study, the indoor climate in summer and winter conditions with different occupancy densities in the classroom is presented. Thermal condition measurements of a half-size classroom were performed in a test room with four air suppliers: wall-grilles, ceiling diffusers, perforated duct diffusers, and displacement ventilation. Those measured data were used for CFD validation of the whole classroom. With CFD simulations, indoor climate parameters with different air diffusers are compared in summer and winter conditions. The results show that displacement ventilation gives the best performance in the occupied zone. The air change efficiency can be reached with displacement ventilation of 1.4 and of only 1 with the other three air diffusers. The air velocities were reasonably low (<0.3 m/s), and the indoor was quite uniform with ceiling diffusers, which is another well-performing solution for classrooms. Corridor wall-grilles give uniform thermal conditions but can have high velocities (0.4 m/s) on the perimeter side of the room space. The air distribution from the perforated duct diffuser is unstable, which causes high local draft (over 20%) in the occupied zone.