Yu Eric Sheng

Prof. Dr. Yu Eric Sheng

Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 June 2019 in China Agricultural Economic Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YQYi Qing
Yi Qing
MCMoyu Chen
Moyu Chen
Yu Eric ShengYu Eric Sheng
Yu Eric Sheng
Jikun HuangJikun Huang
Jikun Huang
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of mechanization services on farm productivity in Northern China from an empirical perspective, with the aim to identify the underlying market and institutional barriers. Design/methodology/approach: The authors apply the regression method with the control of village fixed effects to examining the relationship between capital–labor ratio, mechanization service ratio and farm productivity, using the panel data collected in 2013 and 2015 by CCAP. Findings: Mechanization services improve farm productivity through substituting labor, but it may generate a less positive impact on farms who do not have self-owned capital equipment. Originality/value: It is the first study to investigate how mechanization services affect farm productivity for grain producers in Northern China.

2 August 2019 in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yu Eric ShengYu Eric Sheng
Yu Eric Sheng
XTXiaohui Tian
Xiaohui Tian
WQWeiqing Qiao
Weiqing Qiao
CPChao Peng
Chao Peng

13 December 2019 in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JHJikun Huang
Jikun Huang
SRScott Rozelle
Scott Rozelle
XZXinkai Zhu
Xinkai Zhu
SZShiji Zhao
Shiji Zhao
Yu Eric ShengYu Eric Sheng
Yu Eric Sheng

21 April 2022 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TYTingting Yang
Tingting Yang
DWDingyue Wang
Dingyue Wang
GTGuangmei Tian
Guangmei Tian
LSLinhua Sun
Linhua Sun
MYMinqi Yang
Minqi Yang
YZYue Zhou
Yue Zhou
In eukaryotes, three-dimensional (3D) chromatin architecture maintains genome stability and is important in regulating gene transcription. However, little is known about the mechanisms by which diverse ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulate the 3D chromatin structure in plants. We examined the 3D chromatin structure within the ATPase subunit of the SWI/SNF, ISWI, INO80, and CHD remodeling complexes in wild-type (WT) and mutant Arabidopsis thaliana plants by combining high-throughput sequencing with in situ Hi-C, the enrichment of histone marks, nucleosome density, and gene expression. We found that compartment regions switched and compartmental strength was significantly weakened in all four enzyme mutants. Chromatin remodeling complexes differentially regulated the nucleosome distribution pattern and density within the switching compartments. Alterations of nucleosome distribution pattern and density were associated with a reduction in H3K27me3 levels in the chromatin remodeling enzyme mutants and led to compartment switching. Our data show that chromatin remodeling complexes regulate the linear nucleosome distribution pattern and density to promote H3K27me3 deposition, which in turn regulates 3D chromatin structure.

1 March 2023 in Modern Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YHYuming Hu
Yuming Hu
TZTaolan Zhao
Taolan Zhao
YGYafang Guo
Yafang Guo
MWMeng Wang
Meng Wang
KBKerstin Brachhold
Kerstin Brachhold
QZQifa Zhang
Qifa Zhang
The world is at a crossroad when it comes to agriculture. The global population is growing, and the demand for food is increasing, putting a strain on our agricultural resources and practices. To address this challenge, innovative, sustainable, and inclusive approaches to agriculture are urgently required. In this paper, we launched a call for Essential Questions for the Future of Agriculture and identified a priority list of 100 questions. We focus on 10 primary themes: transforming agri‐food systems, enhancing resilience of agriculture to climate change, mitigating climate change through agriculture, exploring resources and technologies for breeding, advancing cultivation methods, sustaining healthy agroecosystems, enabling smart and controlled‐environment agriculture for food security, promoting health and nutrition‐driven agriculture, exploring economic opportunities and addressing social challenges, and integrating one health and modern agriculture. We emphasise the critical importance of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary research that integrates both basic and applied sciences and bridges the gaps among various stakeholders for achieving sustainable agriculture.

9 August 2022 in China Agricultural Economic Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWei Wei
Wei Wei
QCQi Cui
Qi Cui
Yu Eric ShengYu Eric Sheng
Yu Eric Sheng
Purpose: This paper aims to explore the future path of agricultural development in China toward 2060 under the dual carbon goals, so as to inform better policy choices for facilitating agricultural and rural transformation toward the goal of maintaining food security, sustainable income growth and low carbon emission.Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a single-country, multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium model, CHINAGEM model and develops eight illustrative scenarios to simulate the impacts of attaining dual carbon goals on agricultural development in China. Additional two scenarios have also been designed to inform better policy making with the aim to offset the negative impact of the decarbonization schemes through facilitating agricultural technology progress.Findings: Dual carbon goals are projected to impose substantial negative impact on agricultural productions and consumptions in China in the coming four decades. Under the assumption of business as usual, agricultural production will reduce by 0.49–8.94% along with the attainment of carbon neutrality goal by 2060, with the production of cereals and high-value being more severely damaged. To mitigate the adverse impact of the decarbonization schemes, it is believed that fastening technology progress in agriculture is one of the most efficient ways for maintaining domestic food security without harming the dual carbon goals. In particular, if agricultural productivity (particularly, for cereals and high-value products) can be increased by another 1% per year, the production losses caused by carbon emission mitigation will be fully offset. This implies that promoting technology progress is still the best way to facilitate agricultural development and rural transformation in future China.Originality/value: The paper contributes to the literature in better informing the impact of dual carbon goals on China's agriculture and the effectiveness of technology progress in agriculture on buffering the adverse impact of the decarbonization schemes and promoting agricultural development.