Marion R Munk

Dr. Marion R Munk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 May 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarion R Munk
Marion R Munk
HGHelena Giannakaki-Zimmermann
Helena Giannakaki-Zimmermann
LBLieselotte Berger
Lieselotte Berger
WHWolfgang Huf
Wolfgang Huf
AEAndreas Ebneter
Andreas Ebneter
MZMartin Sebastian Zinkernagel
Martin Sebastian Zinkernagel
To compare the quality of four OCT-angiography(OCT-A) modules. The retina of nineteen healthy volunteers were scanned with four OCT-devices (Topcon DRI-OCT Triton Swept-source OCT, Optovue RTVue-XR, a prototype Spectralis OCT2, Heidelberg-Engineering and Zeiss Cirrus 5000-HD-OCT). The device-software generated en-face OCT-A images of the superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexuses (DCP) were evaluated and scored by 3 independent retinal imaging experts. The SCP vessel density was assessed using Angiotool-software. After the inter-grader reliability assessment, a consensus grading was performed and the modules were ranked based on their scoring. There was no significant difference in the vessel density among the modules (Zeiss 48.7±4%, Optovue 47.9±3%, Topcon 48.3±2%, Heidelberg 46.5±4%, p = 0.2). The numbers of discernible vessel-bifurcations differed significantly on each module (Zeiss 2±0.9 bifurcations, Optovue 2.5±1.2, Topcon 1.3±0.7 and Heidelberg 0.5±0.6, p≤0.001). The ranking of each module differed depending on the evaluated parameter. In the overall ranking, the Zeiss module was superior and in 90% better than the median (Bonferroni corrected p-value = 0.04). Optovue was better than the median in 60%, Topcon in 40% and Heidelberg module in 10%, however these differences were not statistically significant. Each of the four evaluated OCT-A modules had particular strengths, which differentiated it from their competitors.

15 July 2016 in Acta Ophthalmologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMarion R Munk
Marion R Munk
LCLala Ceklic
Lala Ceklic
AEAndreas Ebneter
Andreas Ebneter
WHWolfgang Huf
Wolfgang Huf
SWSebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf
MZMartin Sebastian Zinkernagel
Martin Sebastian Zinkernagel

1 February 2020 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMark C. Gillies
Mark C. Gillies
AHAlex P. Hunyor
Alex P. Hunyor
JAJennifer J. Arnold
Jennifer J. Arnold
RGRobyn H. Guymer
Robyn H. Guymer
SWSebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf
IMIan L. McAllister
Ian L. McAllister
To investigate differences in the development of macular atrophy (MA) over 24 months between treat-and-extend (T&E) ranibizumab and aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). A phase 4 randomized, partially masked, multicenter study. Individuals 50 years of age or older diagnosed with active, treatment-naïve subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD with baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 23 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution letters or more. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg and were treated according to the same reading center-guided T&E regimen after 3 initial monthly injections. The primary outcome was mean change in square root area of MA from baseline to month 24. Key secondary outcomes included number of injections and mean change in BCVA from baseline to months 12 and 24. Two hundred seventy-eight patients were included in the analysis (ranibizumab 0.5 mg, n = 141; aflibercept 2.0 mg, n = 137). Mean change in square root area of MA from baseline to month 24 was +0.36 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.45 mm) for ranibizumab and +0.28 mm (95% CI, 0.19-0.37 mm) for aflibercept (treatment difference, +0.08 mm [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.21 mm]; P = 0.24). The proportion of patients with MA increased from 7% (10/141) to 37% (43/117) for ranibizumab and from 6% (8/137) to 32% (35/108) for aflibercept from baseline to month 24. The average number of injections received per year was similar between both groups: 9.6 (95% CI, 9.2-10.0) for ranibizumab and 9.5 (95% CI, 9.1-9.9) for aflibercept. The mean change in BCVA from baseline to month 24 was +6.6 letters (95% CI,4.7-8.5 letters) for the ranibizumab group and +4.6 letters (95% CI, 2.7-6.6 letters) for the aflibercept group ( P = 0.15). Rates of adverse events (AEs) were similar between both groups. No significant differences in the rate of development or growth of MA over 24 months were observed between ranibizumab and aflibercept in nAMD patients treated using an identical T&E regimen.

1 March 2024 in Retina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDavid Boyer
David Boyer
AHAllen Hu
Allen Hu
DWDavid Warrow
David Warrow
SXSamantha Xavier
Samantha Xavier
VGVictor Gonzalez
Victor Gonzalez
CTClark E. Tedford
Clark E. Tedford
Purpose: The LIGHTSITE III study evaluated multiwavelength photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy in nonexudative (dry) age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using the LumiThera Valeda Light Delivery System. Methods: LIGHTSITE III is a randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of PBM in dry AMD. Subjects were given multiwavelength PBM (590, 660, and 850 nm) or Sham treatment delivered in a series of nine sessions over 3 to 5 weeks every four months over 24 months. Subjects were assessed for efficacy and safety outcomes. Data from the 13-month analysis are presented in this report. Results: A total of 100 subjects (148 eyes) with dry AMD were randomized. LIGHTSITE III met the primary efficacy best-corrected visual acuity endpoint with a significant difference between PBM (n = 91 eyes) and Sham (n = 54 eyes) groups (Between group difference: 2.4 letters (SE 1.15), CI: −4.7 to −0.1, P = 0.02) (PBM alone: 5.4 letters (SE 0.96), CI: 3.5 to 7.3, P < 0.0001; Sham alone: 3.0 letters (SE 1.13), CI: 0.7–5.2, P < 0.0001). The PBM group showed a significant decrease in new onset geographic atrophy (P = 0.024, Fisher exact test, odds ratio 9.4). A favorable safety profile was observed. Conclusion: LIGHTSITE III provides a prospective, randomized, controlled trial showing improved clinical and anatomical outcomes in intermediate dry AMD following PBM therapy.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarion R Munk
Marion R Munk
GSGabor Mark Somfai
Gabor Mark Somfai
MSMarc D. De Smet
Marc D. De Smet
GDGuy Donati
Guy Donati
Marcel MenkeMarcel Menke
Marcel Menke
LCLala Ceklic
Lala Ceklic
This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

2 October 2018 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SYSiqing Yu
Siqing Yu
BFBeatrice E Frueh
Beatrice E Frueh
DSDagmar Steinmair
Dagmar Steinmair
AEAndreas Ebneter
Andreas Ebneter
SWSebastian Wolf
Sebastian Wolf
MMMarion R Munk
Marion R Munk
To analyze retinal blood flow before and after cataract surgery using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA). Prospective observational study. Consecutive patients were recruited and scanned using SS-OCTA before and after cataract surgery. Laser flare photometry were performed post-surgery. Perfusion and vessel density of superficial (SCP) and deep capillary plexuses (DCP) of the 3 × 3 mm images as well as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) measurements were assessed. Vessel continuity, vessel visibility and presence of artefacts were evaluated by two blinded graders using a predefined grading protocol. Thirteen eyes of 12 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was a significant increase of perfusion and vessel densities in both the SCP and the DCP after cataract surgery within the 3 × 3 mm images. Significantly better distinguishability of FAZ border was observed postoperatively in both SCP and DCP, however, FAZ area and perimeter measurements did not significantly change after cataract surgery. Mean number of motion artifacts in SCP and DCP numerically decreased by 37% (P = .089) and 42% (P = .080). Lens opacities have a significant influence on retinal blood flow measurements in SS-OCTA and should be considered in quantitative vessel analysis. Inflammation may also impact the assessment of density parameters. FAZ measurements seems to be the most robust parameters in terms of media opacity.