During its commissioning phase, the Copernicus Sentinel-3B satellite has been placed in a tandem formation with Sentinel-3A for a period of 6 months. This configuration allowed a direct comparison of measurements obtained by the two satellites. The purpose of this paper was to present the range of analyses that can be performed from this dataset, highlighting methodology aspects and the main outcomes for each instrument. We examined, in turn, the benefit of the tandem in understanding instrument operational modes differences, in assessing inter-satellite differences, and in validating measurement uncertainties. The results highlighted the very good consistency of the Sentinel-3A and B instruments, ensuring the complete inter-operability of the constellation. Tandem comparisons also pave the way for further improvements through harmonization of the sensors (OLCI), correction of internal stray-light sources (SLSTR), or high-frequency processing of SRAL SARM data. This paper provided a comprehensive overview of the main results obtained, as well as insights into some of the results. Finally, we drew the main lessons learned from the Sentinel-3 tandem phase and provided recommendations for future missions.

Copernicus is a European system for monitoring the Earth in support of European policy. It includes the Sentinel-3 satellite mission which provides reliable and up-to-date measurements of the ocean, atmosphere, cryosphere, and land. To fulfil mission requirements, two Sentinel-3 satellites are required on-orbit at the same time to meet revisit and coverage requirements in support of Copernicus Services. The inter-unit consistency is critical for the mission as more S3 platforms are planned in the future. A few weeks after its launch in April 2018, the Sentinel-3B satellite was manoeuvred into a tandem configuration with its operational twin Sentinel-3A already in orbit. Both satellites were flown only thirty seconds apart on the same orbit ground track to optimise cross-comparisons. This tandem phase lasted from early June to mid October 2018 and was followed by a short drift phase during which the Sentinel-3B satellite was progressively moved to a specific orbit phasing of 140° separation from the sentinel-3A satellite. In this paper, an output of the European Space Agency (ESA) Sentinel-3 Tandem for Climate study (S3TC), we provide a full methodology for the homogenisation and harmonisation of the two Ocean and Land Colour Instruments (OLCI) based on the tandem phase. Homogenisation adjusts for unavoidable slight spatial and spectral differences between the two sensors and provide a basis for the comparison of the radiometry. Persistent radiometric biases of 1–2% across the OLCI spectrum are found with very high confidence. Harmonisation then consists of adjusting one instrument on the other based on these findings. Validation of the approach shows that such harmonisation then procures an excellent radiometric alignment. Performed on L1 calibrated radiances, the benefits of harmonisation are fully appreciated on Level 2 products as reported in a companion paper. Whereas our methodology aligns one sensor to behave radiometrically as the other, discussions consider the choice of the reference to be used within the operational framework. Further exploitation of the measurements indeed provides evidence of the need to perform flat-fielding on both payloads, prior to any harmonisation. Such flat-fielding notably removes inter-camera differences in the harmonisation coefficients. We conclude on the extreme usefulness of performing a tandem phase for the OLCI mission continuity as well as for any optical mission to which the methodology presented in this paper applies (e.g., Sentinel-2). To maintain the climate record, it is highly recommended that the future Sentinel-3C and Sentinel-3D satellites perform tandem flights when injected into the Sentinel-3 time series.

In the frame of the European Space Agency (ESA) Scientific Exploitation of Operational Missions (SEOM) program new algorithms are developed to validate the Sentinel-2 level 1C (L1C) product radiometry, beyond the baseline algorithms used operationally in the frame of the Sentinel-2 Mission Performance Centre (MPC). In this context this paper presents the implementation of a Sentinel-2 radiometric validation approach based on deep convective cloud (DCC) observations. Due to their physical properties DCCs can be used to monitor the radiometric response degradation of the reflective solar bands of optical sensors. Their observation allows interband radiometry validation in the visible-near infrared (VIS-NIR) domain relatively to an a priori well calibrated reference band. We first present the selection of Sentinel-2 data acquired over DCC targets, as well as the tools and assumptions used for the modeling of the theoretical DCC radiometric response. The validation methodology is then thoroughly described and justified. It is based on the comparisons between the observed and the simulated top-of-atmosphere reflectance spectrum. Interband radiometric validation is performed through the statistical analysis of a large collection of individual observations. Results show the very good radiometric performance of Sentinel-2 with interband gains lower than 2%.

This study is a follow-up of a full methodology for the homogenisation and harmonisation of the two Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) payloads based on the OLCI-A/OLCI-B tandem phase analysis. This analysis provided cross-calibration factors between the two instruments with a very high precision, providing a ‘truth’ from the direct comparison of simultaneous and collocated acquisitions. The long-term monitoring of such cross-calibration is a prerequisite for an operational application of sensors harmonisation along the mission lifetime, no other tandem phase between OLCI-A and OLCI-B being foreseen due to the cost of such operation. This article presents a novel approach for the monitoring of the OLCI radiometry based on statistics of Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) observations, especially dedicated to accurately monitor the full across-track dependency of the cross-calibration of OLCI-A and OLCI-B. Specifically, the inflexion point of DCC reflectance distributions is used as an indicator of the absolute calibration for each subdivision of the OLCI Field-of-View. This inflexion point is shown to provide better precision than the mode of the distributions which is commonly used in the community. Excess of saturation in OLCI-A high radiances is handled through the analysis of interband relationships between impacted channels and reference channels that are not impacted by saturation. Such analysis also provides efficient insights on the variability of the target’s response as well as on the evolution of the interband calibration of each payload. First, cross-calibration factors obtained over the tandem period allows to develop and validate the approach, notably for the handling of the saturated pixels, based on the comparison with the ‘truth’ obtained from the tandem analysis. Factors obtained out of (and far from) the tandem period then provides evidence that the cross-calibration reported over the tandem period (1–2% bias between the instruments) as well as inter-camera calibration residuals persist with very similar proportions, to the exception of the 400 nm channel and with slightly less precision for the 1020 nm channel. For all OLCI channels, relative differences between the cross-calibration factors obtained from the tandem analysis and the factors obtained over the other period are below 1% from a monthly analysis, even below 0.5% from a multi-monthly analysis). This opens the way not only to an accurate long-term monitoring of the OLCI radiometry but also, and precisely targeted for this study, to the monitoring of the cross-calibration of the two sensors over the mission lifetime. It also provides complementary information to the tandem analysis as the calibration indicators are traced individually for each sensor across-track, confirming and quantifying inter-camera radiometric biases, independently for both sensors. Assumptions used in this study are discussed and validated, also providing a framework for the adaptation of the presented methodology to other optical sensors.

This study is a follow-up of a full methodology for the homogenisation and harmonisation of the two Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) payloads based on the tandem phase analysis. Sentinel-3B was manoeuvred into a tandem configuration with its operational twin Sentinel-3A already in orbit few weeks after its launch, which was followed by a short drift phase during which Sentinel-3B was progressively moved to a specific orbit phasing of 140° separation from the sentinel-3A. Harmonisation is performed at Level 1 for the radiometric alignment of the OLCI-A TOA radiances to the ones of OLCI-B, considering the slight spectral differences between the two instruments. The benefits of this harmonisation for the main Level 2 products are assessed in the present manuscript for both land and water products. The results validate such benefits showing accuracy between the two sensors after harmonisation better than the products requirements specifications. For the water processing branch, this accuracy opens a path toward an ensemble Sentinel-3 system vicarious calibration with ground-truth measurements. For land products, the tandem phase analysis is also an opportunity to demonstrate that the terrestrial chlorophyll index product requires improvements of the preliminary spectral adjustment of the red-edge channel at 709 nm. As comparisons from the measurements acquired over the tandem phase provides confidence in the alignment of the OLCI-A and OLCI-B series of products, preliminary analysis of the measurements acquired over the drift phase provides the first insights into the sensitivity of the processing algorithms to the geometry of acquisition as well as to calibration residuals of the OLCI field-of-view. As the harmonisation currently performs a radiometric alignment of OLCI-A to OLCI-B, the question of the reference sensor for operational implementation of the harmonisation raises concerns on the individual quality of the calibration of each sensor, notably their across-track consistency. Following the investigations performed at Level 1, where relatively strong calibration residuals are shown between the OLCI cameras and very similarly for both instruments; we discuss the impact of these residuals at L2 using an empirical correction and further conclude with the need to address these problematics with more attention in the future. We conclude with the extreme usefulness of the tandem phase analysis, presently for Level 2 products, and the need to further monitor the temporal stability of the cross-calibration of the OLCI payloads with a view to implementing their harmonisation at operational level.