Nowadays, coronavirus (COVID-19) is getting international attention due it considered as a life-threatened epidemic disease that hard to control the spread of infection around the world. Machine learning (ML) is one of intelligent technique that able to automatically predict the event with reasonable accuracy based on the experience and learning process. In the meantime, a rapid number of ML models have been proposed for predicate the cases of COVID-19. Thus, there is need for an evaluation and benchmarking of COVID-19 ML models which considered the main challenge of this study. Furthermore, there is no single study have addressed the problem of evaluation and benchmarking of COVID diagnosis models. However, this study proposed an intelligent methodology is to help the health organisations in the selection COVID-19 diagnosis system. The benchmarking and evaluation of diagnostic models for COVID-19 is not a trivial process. There are multiple criteria requires to evaluate and some of the criteria are conflicting with each other. Our study is formulated as a decision matrix (DM) that embedded mix of ten evaluation criteria and twelve diagnostic models for COVID-19. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is employed to evaluate and benchmarking the different diagnostic models for COVID19 with respect to the evaluation criteria. An integrated MCDM method are proposed where TOPSIS applied for the benchmarking and ranking purpose while Entropy used to calculate the weights of criteria. The study results revealed that the benchmarking and selection problems associated with COVID19 diagnosis models can be effectively solved using the integration of Entropy and TOPSIS. The SVM (linear) classifier is selected as the best diagnosis model for COVID19 with the closeness coefficient value of 0.9899 for our case study data. Furthermore, the proposed methodology has solved the significant variance for each criterion in terms of ideal best and worst best value, beside issue when specific diagnosis models have same ideal best value.

Symmetric encryption has been considered as one of the essential means of ensuring security of end to end communication. The robustness and strength of modern day block encryption systems are based on the cryptographic features of substitution-boxes which are used to inject confusion ability during substitution-phases. In this paper, as an alternative to random, chaos or algebraic based construction methods, we propose to present an efficient method for the generation of cryptographic highly nonlinear substitution-boxes. The nature-inspired particle swarm optimization is reconnoitered to develop proposed method wherein the initial population is generated through a simple but with rich dynamics chaotic Renyi map. The anticipated method is analyzed for different scenarios such as change in population size, number of iterations, and linear increase in inertial weight. The performance assessment of generated S-boxes under standard criterions corroborate that the proposed method has excellent cryptographic features and found grander than many recent optimization based S-box methods. Moreover, an image encryption application of proposed S-boxes is also suggested to determine their suitability and applicability for image based security applications.

Growing concern about healthcare information security in the wake of alarmingly rising cyber-attacks is being given symmetrical priority by current researchers and cyber security experts. Intruders are penetrating symmetrical mechanisms of healthcare information security continuously. In the same league, the paper presents an overview on the current situation of healthcare information and presents a layered model of healthcare information management in organizations. The paper also evaluates the various factors that have a key contribution in healthcare information security breaches through a hybrid fuzzy-based symmetrical methodology of AHP-TOPSIS. Furthermore, for assessing the effect of the calculated results, the authors have tested the results on local hospital software of Varanasi. Tested results of the factors are validated through the comparison and sensitivity analysis in this study. Tabulated results of the proposed study propose a symmetrical mechanism as the most conversant technique which can be employed by the experts and researchers for preparing security guidelines and strategies.

The main idea for practicing research towards security is to maintain usability of the software as well. This can be achieved by making less complex and high secure software. Though considerable efforts have been made in this context by the developers and security experts, the standard of usable-security is not the same as it should be. Therefore, it is important to research more on the most conversant mechanisms for assessing and increasing the usable-security of software. The quantitative evaluation of usability and security is an important part in increasing the level of secure software. This paper, in particular, is intended to estimate the usable-security of software and achieve the objective of developing software with optimum security while retaining its usability. The decisionmakers often find it difficult to integrate security and usability. Hence this paper approaches the integration of usability and security with its contributing attributes. Also, in this league, the present research study suggests a novel technique which is the hybrid of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Hesitant Fuzzy (HF) sets, and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to significantly assess the usability along with security. To test the usefulness of the proposed approach hybrid HF-AHP-TOPSIS technique, the researchers applied it onto software developed for Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University in India. Furthermore, the procedural sensitivity was also achieved by using the various versions of the method. The findings of the usability along with security assessment insist that this inventive hybrid procedure would be the most conversant mechanism for determining the usable-security of software. Further these findings will be helpful in managing security without affecting the usability for end user.

Increasing the number of threats against software vulnerabilities and rapidly growing data breaches have become a key concern for both the IT industry and stakeholders. Developing secure software systems when there is a high demand for software products from individuals as well as the organizations is in itself a big challenge for the designers and developers. Meanwhile, adopting traditional and informal learnings to address security issues of software products has made it easier for cyber-criminals to expose software vulnerabilities. Hence, it is imperative for the security practitioners to employ a symmetric mechanism so as to achieve the desired level of software security. In this context, a decision-making approach is the most symmetrical technique to assess the security of software in security tactics perspective. Since the security tactics directly address the quality attribute concerns, this symmetric approach will be highly effective in making the software systems more secure. In this study, the authors have selected three main attributes and fifteen sub-attributes at level 1 and level 2, respectively, with ten different software of an institute as alternatives. Furthermore, this study uses a fuzzy-based symmetrical decision-making approach to assess the security of software with respect to tactics. Fuzzy Analytic Network Process (F-ANP) is applied to evaluate the weights of criteria and fuzzy-Symmetrical technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used to determine impact of alternatives. The proposed symmetrical assessment in this study will be beneficial for both the designers and developers to categorize and prioritize the security attributes and understand the importance of security tactics during software development life cycle.