In the last few years, most of the public universities in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have adopted electronic learning (e-learning) as an evolutionary educational platform both by choice and by demand. Despite its many advantages, it has increased the ethical and moral challenges faced in the form of the violations of academic integrity that exist in traditional education. Universities all over the world are struggling to overcome these issues. Keeping this in mind, the purpose of this paper is to investigate and priorities the factors of violating academic integrity within Saudi Arabian universities. Based on the previously published literature and using Delphi - based discussions with e-Learning experts, this paper has identified twelve major factors which were related to e-Learning environment, Awareness on Academic Integrity, and e-Learning guiding principles. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to prioritize these factors. It was concluded that inappropriate guidelines provided to students was the most contributing factor while Shortage of feedbacks was least contributing factor among all the identified factors.

The rapid growth of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)—specifically, the Internet—has given emergence to e-learning. Resultantly, web-based e-learning systems are being increasingly developed to enhance the learning process. However, the utilization of such systems is low, mainly owing to poor quality content and overall design problems. To improve usage, it is imperative to identify the factors with the most significant impact on the quality of these systems so that the e-learning industry keeps these factors in consideration while developing e-learning systems. This study focused on the identification and prioritization of factors related to the design quality of e-learning systems through a hierarchical quality model. Thus, firstly, an extensive literature review was conducted to identify the factors that most affect the quality of web-based e-learning systems. Secondly, among the identified factors, only those with the most significant effect were considered. To identify the most important quality criteria, a survey was conducted. An instrument was deployed among 157 subjects, including e-learning designers, developers, students, teachers, and educational administrators. Finally, a second instrument was distributed among 51 participants to make a pairwise comparison among the criteria and rank them according to their relative importance. The identified and prioritized factors were classified into four main categories. Among these four factors, content was identified as the most important factor, whereas design was found to be the least important factor.

Agile software development does not include elicitation and management of non-functional requirements (NFRs). Several techniques have been proposed by researchers to elicit, manage and prioritize NFRs. The major issue with such techniques is that they involve customer or users to elicit and prioritize NFRs, which becomes problematic because they do not have exposure of NFRs. They may only be familiar with very few common NFRs such as performance, efficiency and security etc. There could be several other NFRs such as confidentiality, scalability, usability, maintainability, portability, reliability and many others which may not be known to the stakeholders. Consequently, some relevant NFRs may be missed and some wrong NFRS may be implemented in the final product which can degrade its overall quality. Secondly, it is very time consuming to elicit and prioritize NFRs from the stakeholders who have very low exposure. It is especially critical in the case of agile software development where product is developed and delivered at a very rapid pace. To overcome the challenge, this study proposed a model to prioritize NFRs for agile software development to produce quality software products. Thus, firstly, an extensive literature review was conducted to identify the NFRs which were further ranked through a survey carried out in agile software companies. Moreover, the NFRs were analyzed and prioritized using multi criteria decision making analysis technique called analytical hierarchical technique (AHP). The evaluation results showed that the NFRs prioritization model reduce the overhead of meetings and discussion required to gather and identify the NFRs common to agile products.

In the higher education sector, there is a growing trend to offer academic information to users through websites. Contemporarily, the users (i.e., students/teachers, parents, and administrative staff) greatly rely on these websites to perform various academic tasks, including admission, access to learning management systems (LMS), and links to other relevant resources. These users vary from each other in terms of their technological competence, objectives, and frequency of use. Therefore, academic websites should be designed considering different dimensions, so that everybody can be accommodated. Knowing the different dimensions with respect to the usability of academic websites is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach has been considered to be a significant method to deal with the uncertainty that is involved in subjective judgment. Although a wide range of usability factors for academic websites have already been identified, most of them are based on the judgment of experts who have never used these websites. This study identified important factors through a detailed literature review, classified them, and prioritized the most critical among them through the FAHP methodology, involving relevant users to propose a usability evaluation framework for academic websites. To validate the proposed framework, five websites of renowned higher educational institutes (HEIs) were evaluated and ranked according to the usability criteria. As the proposed framework was created methodically, the authors believe that it would be helpful for detecting real usability issues that currently exist in academic websites.

The Internet of Things is a system of interconnected smart devices that can communicate with each other and with other devices over the Internet, with or without human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction. Although IoT devices, which have IPs, make living easier, they are also a threat to the security and privacy of people. This research work presents a solution to the problem of security in the network of IoT, based on the idea of implementing the blockchain in IoT. Blockchain is a decentralized technology that adds blocks at the end of the chain. It saves the hash value for every block, and corresponds to the previous block. The decentralized behavior of blockchain is best for IoT as an extensive network, because IoT must not have a single point of failure, and one entity must not decide what to do. All the capable storage devices will save the same data entered from any device, removing the risk of receiving altered data.

A structured and specified project management competency framework plays a significant role in accomplishing the goal of non-governmental organization in line with its mission and strategic plan. However, constrained resources and extended requirements from the donors and stakeholders in non-governmental organization (NGO) in Pakistan emphasize the necessity of a tailored, adaptable project management competencies framework to meet project requirements. Considerations have been given to project managers’ competencies in prior literature. Still, limited study exists on identifying the project management competency dimensions, especially in the NGO sector of Pakistan. In this research, we have studied the project management competencies, dimensions “Strategic and Business Management”, “Leadership” and “Technical Project Management”. Keeping in view the expertise and diversity, the opinions of subject matter experts from NGO sectors across Pakistan was taken. The data was collected through the questionnaire using pairwise comparison and analyzed by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which falls under the umbrella of MDCM. The results of the study of the NGO sector concluded that the competency dimension “Strategic and Business Management” has the most significance, followed by “Leadership and “Technical Project Management”. In the hierarchy of the competencies by their global weights is as follows, Strategic Planning Alignment has the most significance, followed by Problem Solving, Customer Relationship and Satisfaction, Cost Estimation/Budget, Project Management Tools and Technique, Team Building, Benefits Management Realization, Market Awareness, and Condition, Coaching and Mentoring, Schedule Management, Verbal, and Written Communication and Listening.