Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa

Dr. Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Plant Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JVJorge Valle-Torres
Jorge Valle-Torres
TRTiffanna Ross
Tiffanna Ross
DPDiane E. Plewa
Diane E. Plewa
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
JCJill Check
Jill Check
CCC.D. Cruz
C.D. Cruz
Tar spot of corn has been a major foliar disease in several Latin American countries since 1904. In 2015, tar spot was first documented in the United States and has led to significant yield losses of approximately 4.5 million t. Tar spot is caused by an obligate pathogen, Phyllachora maydis, and thus requires a living host to grow and reproduce. Due to its obligate nature, biological and epidemiological studies are limited and impact of disease in corn production has been understudied. Here we present the current literature and gaps in knowledge of tar spot of corn in the Americas, its etiology, distribution, impact and known management strategies as a resource for understanding the pathosystem. This will in turn guide current and future research and aid in the development of effective management strategies for this disease.

12 March 2022 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EMElvia Guadalupe Melara
Elvia Guadalupe Melara
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
MVManuel Valdivié
Manuel Valdivié
YGYaneisy García-Hernández
Yaneisy García-Hernández
RGRoisbel Aroche Ginarte
Roisbel Aroche Ginarte
YMYordan Martínez
Yordan Martínez
Antibiotic growth-promoters in animal feeding are known to generate bacterial resistance on commercial farms and have proven deleterious effects on human health. This review addresses the effects of probiotics and their symbiotic relationship with the animal host as a viable alternative for producing healthy meat, eggs, and milk at present and in the future. Probiotics can tolerate the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, such as the gastric acid, pH and bile salts, to exert beneficial effects on the host. They (probiotics) may also have a beneficial effect on productivity, health and wellbeing in different parameters of animal performance. Probiotics stimulate the native microbiota (microbes that are present in their place of origin) and production of short-chain fatty acids, with proven effects such as antimicrobial, hypocholesterolemic and immunomodulatory effects, resulting in better intestinal health, nutrient absorption capacity and productive responses in ruminant and non-ruminant animals. These beneficial effects of probiotics are specific to each microbial strain; therefore, the isolation and identification of beneficial microorganisms, as well as in vitro and in vivo testing in different categories of farm animals, will guarantee their efficacy, replicability and sustainability in the current production systems.

30 April 2014 in Plant Breeding
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APArnold S. Parco
Arnold S. Parco
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
AHAnna H. Hale
Anna H. Hale
JHJeffrey W. Hoy
Jeffrey W. Hoy
CKCollins A. Kimbeng
Collins A. Kimbeng
NBNiranjan Baisakh
Niranjan Baisakh

23 June 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YMYordan Martínez
Yordan Martínez
CACristopher Isaac Almendares
Cristopher Isaac Almendares
CHCristhian José Hernández
Cristhian José Hernández
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
AUAna Melissa Urquía
Ana Melissa Urquía
MVManuel Valdivié
Manuel Valdivié
To evaluate the effect of acetic acid and sodium bicarbonate supplemented to drinking water on water quality, growth performance, relative organ weights, cecal traits and hematological parameters of broilers, a total of 456 one-day-old Cobb MV × Cobb 500 FF mixed broilers were randomly placed in three experimental treatments, with four replicates per treatment and 38 birds per replicate, for 10 days. The treatments consisted of the use of acetic acid (0.4%; T1) as acidifier, an apparently neutral pH (T2) and sodium bicarbonate (1%; T3) as alkalizer of the drinking water. T3 showed the highest values (p < 0.05) for total dissolved solids, electrical conductivity, salinity and pH. T1 and T2 showed the same productive response (p > 0.05); however, T3 decreased (p < 0.05) body weight, feed intake and the relative weight of the pancreas and immune organs and increased (p < 0.05) water intake, mortality and relative weight of the heart and liver. Likewise, T3 increased (p < 0.05) the cecal pH, although without changes for the cecal lactic cecal bacteria count and blood parameters (p > 0.05). The acid pH of the drinking water had no effect on the biological response of broilers compared to T2; however, the T3 provoked high mortality, ascites, low productivity and abnormal growth of some organs.

16 July 2017 in Plant Breeding
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
APArnold S. Parco
Arnold S. Parco
AHAnna L. Hale
Anna L. Hale
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
JHJeffrey W. Hoy
Jeffrey W. Hoy
CKCollins A. Kimbeng
Collins A. Kimbeng
NBNiranjan Baisakh
Niranjan Baisakh

15 July 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCésar Betancur
César Betancur
YMYordan Martínez
Yordan Martínez
Guillermo TellezGuillermo Tellez
Guillermo Tellez
CBCarolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Carolina Avellaneda Barbosa
Borja Velázquez-MartíBorja Velázquez-Martí
Borja Velázquez-Martí
Three lactic acid strains were isolated from feces of the native Zungo Pelado breed of pigs (n = 5) and presumably identified as belonging to the Lactobacillaceae family by morphological techniques showing that they were Gram-positive/rod-shaped and catalase- and oxidase-negative. They were then identified by biochemical tests using API 50CHL as Lactobacillus plantarum (CAM6), Lactobacillus brevis (CAM7), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (CL4). However, 16S rRNA identification showed that all three strains were Lactobacillus plantarum. Additionally, all three isolates were able to grow in pH 3 and 4. Interestingly, the growth of the CAM7 strain decreased at pH 5.6 compared to that of the CAM6 strain (p < 0.05), and the growth of the CL4 strain was reduced at pH 7(p < 0.05). All three candidates showed good growth on bile salts (≥0.15%), and CAM6 and CAM7 showed better tolerance at higher concentrations (0.30%). Similarly, all strains tolerated sodium chloride (NaCl) concentrations from 2 to 10%. These strains also grew well at all temperatures tested (30, 37, and 42 °C). The CAM6 strain showed in vitro antibacterial activity against selected enteropathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli strain NBRC 102203 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium 4.5.12) and commensal bacteria (Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705D-5 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442) and resistance to all antibiotics except amoxicillin. Further studies to evaluate the effects of these probiotic candidate strains in commercial pigs are currently underway.