Niels Piot

Mr. Niels Piot

Department of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 April 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alexis BeaurepaireAlexis Beaurepaire
Alexis Beaurepaire
Niels PiotNiels Piot
Niels Piot
VDVincent Doublet
Vincent Doublet
KAKarina Antúnez
Karina Antúnez
ECEWAN CAMPBELL
EWAN CAMPBELL
ADAnne Dalmon
Anne Dalmon
In the past centuries, viruses have benefited from globalization to spread across the globe, infecting new host species and populations. A growing number of viruses have been documented in the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. Several of these contribute significantly to honey bee colony losses. This review synthetizes the knowledge of the diversity and distribution of honey-bee-infecting viruses, including recent data from high-throughput sequencing (HTS). After presenting the diversity of viruses and their corresponding symptoms, we surveyed the scientific literature for the prevalence of these pathogens across the globe. The geographical distribution shows that the most prevalent viruses (deformed wing virus, sacbrood virus, black queen cell virus and acute paralysis complex) are also the most widely distributed. We discuss the ecological drivers that influence the distribution of these pathogens in worldwide honey bee populations. Besides the natural transmission routes and the resulting temporal dynamics, global trade contributes to their dissemination. As recent evidence shows that these viruses are often multihost pathogens, their spread is a risk for both the beekeeping industry and the pollination services provided by managed and wild pollinators.

28 May 2020 in Frontiers in Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Orlando YañezOrlando Yañez
Orlando Yañez
Niels PiotNiels Piot
Niels Piot
ADAnne Dalmon
Anne Dalmon
Joachim de MirandaJoachim de Miranda
Joachim de Miranda
PCPanuwan Chantawannakul
Panuwan Chantawannakul
NCNor Chejanovsky
Nor Chejanovsky
Numerous studies have recently reported on the discovery of bee viruses in different arthropod species and their possible transmission routes, vastly increasing our understanding of these viruses and their distribution. Here, we review the current literature on the recent advances in understanding the transmission of viruses, both on the presence of bee viruses in Apis and non-Apis bee species and on the discovery of previously unknown bee viruses. The natural transmission of bee viruses will be discussed among different bee species and other insects. Finally, the research potential of in vivo (host organisms) and in vitro (cell lines) serial passages of bee viruses is discussed, from the perspective of the host-virus landscape changes and potential transmission routes for emerging bee virus infections.

1 April 2022 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MPM.A. Parreño
M.A. Parreño
CAC. Alaux
C. Alaux
Jean-Luc BRUNETJean-Luc BRUNET
Jean-Luc BRUNET
LBL. Buydens
L. Buydens
Michał FilipiakMichał Filipiak
Michał Filipiak
Sara LeonhardtSara Leonhardt
Sara Leonhardt
Wild bee populations are declining due to human activities, such as land use change, which strongly affect the composition and diversity of available plants and food sources. The chemical composition of food (i.e., nutrition) in turn determines the health, resilience, and fitness of bees. For pollinators, however, the term 'health' is recent and is subject to debate, as is the interaction between nutrition and wild bee health. We define bee health as a multidimensional concept in a novel integrative framework linking bee biological traits (physiology, stoichiometry, and disease) and environmental factors (floral diversity and nutritional landscapes). Linking information on tolerated nutritional niches and health in different bee species will allow us to better predict their distribution and responses to environmental change, and thus support wild pollinator conservation.

11 October 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maxence GérardMaxence Gérard
Maxence Gérard
DMDenis Michez
Denis Michez
VDVincent Debat
Vincent Debat
LFLovina Fullgrabe
Lovina Fullgrabe
IMIvan Meeus
Ivan Meeus
Maryse VanderplanckMaryse Vanderplanck
Maryse Vanderplanck
Human activities can generate a wide variety of direct and indirect effects on animals, which can manifest as environmental and genetic stressors. Several phenotypic markers have been proposed as indicators of these stressful conditions but have displayed contrasting results, depending, among others, on the phenotypic trait measured. Knowing the worldwide decline of multiple bumblebee species, it is important to understand these stressors and link them with the drivers of decline. We assessed the impact of several stressors (i.e. natural toxin-, parasite-, thermic- and inbreeding- stress) on both wing shape and size and their variability as well as their directional and fluctuating asymmetries. The total data set includes 650 individuals ofBombus terrestris(Hymenoptera: Apidae). Overall wing size and shape were affected by all the tested stressors. Except for the sinigrin (e.g. glucosinolate) stress, each stress implies a decrease of wing size. Size variance was affected by several stressors, contrary to shape variance that was affected by none of them. Although wing size directional and fluctuating asymmetries were significantly affected by sinigrin, parasites and high temperatures, neither directional nor fluctuating shape asymmetry was significantly affected by any tested stressor. Parasites and high temperatures led to the strongest phenotype modifications. Overall size and shape were the most sensitive morphological traits, which contrasts with the common view that fluctuating asymmetry is the major phenotypic marker of stress.

3 February 2022 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Niels PiotNiels Piot
Niels Piot
OSOliver Schweiger
Oliver Schweiger
IMIvan Meeus
Ivan Meeus
Orlando YañezOrlando Yañez
Orlando Yañez
LSLars Straub
Lars Straub
Joachim de MirandaJoachim de Miranda
Joachim de Miranda
Viruses are omnipresent, yet the knowledge on drivers of viral prevalence in wild host populations is often limited. Biotic factors, such as sympatric managed host species, as well as abiotic factors, such as climatic variables, are likely to impact viral prevalence. Managed and wild bees, which harbor several multi-host viruses with a mostly fecal–oral between-species transmission route, provide an excellent system with which to test for the impact of biotic and abiotic factors on viral prevalence in wild host populations. Here we show on a continental scale that the prevalence of three broad host viruses: the AKI-complex (Acute bee paralysis virus,Kashmir bee virusandIsraeli acute paralysis virus),Deformed wing virus, andSlow bee paralysis virusin wild bee populations (bumble bees and solitary bees) is positively related to viral prevalence of sympatric honey bees as well as being impacted by climatic variables. The former highlights the need for good beekeeping practices, includingVarroa destructormanagement to reduce honey bee viral infection and hive placement. Furthermore, we found that viral prevalence in wild bees is at its lowest at the extreme ends of both temperature and precipitation ranges. Under predicted climate change, the frequency of extremes in precipitation and temperature will continue to increase and may hence impact viral prevalence in wild bee communities.

1 April 2018 in Current Opinion in Insect Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IMIvan Meeus
Ivan Meeus
MPMatti Pisman
Matti Pisman
Guy SmaggheGuy Smagghe
Guy Smagghe
Niels PiotNiels Piot
Niels Piot