Emily Simonavice

Dr. Emily Simonavice


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
MOMichael Ormsbee
Michael Ormsbee
WMW Kyle Mandler
W Kyle Mandler
DTD David Thomas
D David Thomas
EWEmery G Ward
Emery G Ward
AKAmber W Kinsey
Amber W Kinsey
JKJeong-Su Kim
Jeong-Su Kim
Resistance training (RT) enhances muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy while increasing strength and power. Some multi-ingredient performance supplements (MIPS) have been shown to augment the physiological improvements associated with RT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of specific pre- and post-workout MIPS on anabolic hormones, body composition, muscle strength, and power in resistance-trained men participating in a periodized RT program.

11 August 2016 in Supportive Care in Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ESEmily Simonavice
Emily Simonavice
JKJeong-Su Kim
Jeong-Su Kim
LPLynn Panton
Lynn Panton

11 August 2015 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ESEmily Simonavice
Emily Simonavice
PLPei-Yang Liu
Pei-Yang Liu
Jasminka IlichJasminka Ilich
Jasminka Ilich
JKJeong-Su Kim
Jeong-Su Kim
Bahram ArjmandiBahram Arjmandi
Bahram Arjmandi
LPLynn Panton
Lynn Panton
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) exhibit decreased physical function and quality of life (QOL) following cancer treatments. Resistance training (RT) may elicit positive changes in physical and mental well-being. This study assessed 27 BCS, pre-and post-intervention (six months) on the following variables: muscular strength (via one repetition maximum (1RM) of chest press and leg extension), physical function (via the Continuous Scale-Physical Functional Performance test) and QOL (via the Short Form-36 survey). RT consisted of two days/week of ten exercises including two sets of 8–12 repetitions at 52%–69% of their 1RM. A repeated measures analysis of variance revealed BCS significantly (p < 0.05) increased upper (71 ± 22 to 89 ± 22 kg) and lower body (74 ± 18 to 93 ± 24 kg) strength, total physical function (65.5 ± 12.1 to 73.6 ± 12.2 units) and the subcomponents of physical function: upper body strength (63.5 ± 16.3 to 71.2 ± 16.8 units), lower body strength (58.5 ± 14.9 to 68.6 ± 16.3 units), balance and coordination (66.5 ± 12.2 to 74.6 ± 11.6 units), and endurance (67.2 ± 12.0 to 75.0 ± 11.6 units). No changes were observed over time for subjective measures of physical function and QOL. Results showed RT could be an effective means to improve objective physical function in BCS. Further research is needed to clarify the effects of RT on subjective physical function and QOL.

1 January 2013 in Nutrition & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMichael Ormsbee
Michael Ormsbee
DTDennison Thomas
Dennison Thomas
WMWilliam Mandler
William Mandler
EWEmery G Ward
Emery G Ward
AKAmber W Kinsey
Amber W Kinsey
JKJeong-Su Kim
Jeong-Su Kim
Background The cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic health benefits or risks associated with consumption of multi-ingredient performance supplements (MIPS) in conjunction with periodized resistance training (RT) in resistance-trained men are unknown. This population is a major target audience for performance supplements, and therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the combined effect of RT and commercially available pre- and post-exercise performance supplements on CV health and body fat in resistance-trained men. Methods Twenty-four resistance-trained men completed six weeks (three times/week) of periodized RT while either ingesting SHOT 15-min pre-exercise and SYN immediately post-exercise (multi-ingredient performance supplement group: MIPS) or an isocaloric maltodextrin placebo 15-min pre-exercise and immediately post-exercise (Placebo group). Before and after six weeks of RT and supplementation, resting heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), total body fat, android fat, gynoid fat, fat-free mass (FFM) and fasting blood measures of glucose, lipids, nitrate/nitrite (NOx), cortisol and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured. Statistical analysis was conducted using a one-way ANOVA for baseline differences and a 2 × 2 (group × time) repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests where appropriate. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results There was no group × time interaction for HR, BP, blood glucose, lipids, NOx, hs-CRP, cortisol concentrations or body fat. However, there was a time effect where significant decreases in body fat (mean ± SD; MIPS: -1.2 ± 1.2%; Placebo: -0.9 ± 1.1%), android fat (MIPS: -1.8 ± 2.1%; Placebo: -1.6 ± 2.0%), and gynoid fat (MIPS: -1.3 ± 1.6%; Placebo: -1.0 ± 1.4%) for both groups were observed. FFM increased in both groups, and a group × time interaction was observed with MIPS increasing significantly more than the Placebo group (4.2% vs. 1.9%). Conclusions Six weeks of MIPS ingestion and periodized RT does not alter CV health parameters or blood indices of health or body fat more than a Placebo treatment in healthy, resistance-trained men. However, MIPS significantly increased FFM more than Placebo.

1 May 2015 in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEmily Simonavice
Emily Simonavice
MNMatthew Nelson
Matthew Nelson

1 January 2010
Verified
Dataset
Closed access
SRSelen Razon
Selen Razon
TRTonya Rasor
Tonya Rasor
ESEmily Simonavice
Emily Simonavice
BLBrittany Loney
Brittany Loney
AGArsal Guler
Arsal Guler
Gershon TenenbaumGershon Tenenbaum
Gershon Tenenbaum