Mait Kriipsalu

Mait Kriipsalu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
MMMarcia Marques
Marcia Marques
AMAleksander Maastik
Aleksander Maastik

1 June 2018 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJuris Burlakovs
Juris Burlakovs
YJYahya Jani
Yahya Jani
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
ZVZane Vincevica-Gaile
Zane Vincevica-Gaile
FKFabio Kaczala
Fabio Kaczala
MKMaris Klavins
Maris Klavins

1 August 2017 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juris BurlakovsJuris Burlakovs
Juris Burlakovs
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
MKMaris Klavins
Maris Klavins
Amit BhatnagarAmit Bhatnagar
Amit Bhatnagar
ZVZane Vincevica-Gaile
Zane Vincevica-Gaile
WHWilliam Hogland
William Hogland

1 September 2007 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
MMMarcia Marques
Marcia Marques
DNDiauddin R. Nammari
Diauddin R. Nammari
WHWilliam Hogland
William Hogland

14 October 2016 in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YJYahya Jani
Yahya Jani
FKFabio Kaczala
Fabio Kaczala
CMCharlotte Marchand
Charlotte Marchand
MHMarika Hogland
Marika Hogland
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
AKAnders Kihl
Anders Kihl
The present research studies the characterisation and the physico-chemical properties of an excavated fine fraction (<10 mm) from a Swedish landfill, the Högbytorp. The results showed that the fine fraction represents 38% by mass of the total excavated wastes and it contains mainly soil-type materials and minerals. Higher concentrations of zinc, copper, barium and chromium were found with concentrations higher than the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for contaminated soil. The found moisture and organic contents of the fine fraction were 23.5% and 16.6%, respectively. The analysed calorific value (1.7 MJ kg−1), the potential of CH4 (4.74 m3 t−1 dry matter) and Total Organic Carbon (TOC) (5.6%) were low and offer low potential of energy. Sieving the fine fraction further showed that 80% was smaller than 2 mm. The fine represents a major fraction at any landfill (40%–70%), therefore, characterising the properties of this fraction is essential to find the potential of reusing/recycling or safely redisposing.

14 June 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZVZane Vincevica-Gaile
Zane Vincevica-Gaile
TTTonis Teppand
Tonis Teppand
Mait KriipsaluMait Kriipsalu
Mait Kriipsalu
MKMāris Krievāns
Māris Krievāns
YJYahya Jani
Yahya Jani
Juris BurlakovsJuris Burlakovs
Juris Burlakovs
Implementation of construction works on weak (e.g., compressible, collapsible, expansive) soils such as peatlands often is limited by logistics of equipment and shortage of available and applicable materials. If preloading or floating roads on geogrid reinforcement or piled embankments cannot be implemented, then soil stabilization is needed. Sustainable soil stabilization in an environmentally friendly way is recommended instead of applying known conventional methods such as pure cementing or excavation and a single replacement of soils. Substitution of conventional material (cement) and primary raw material (lime) with secondary raw material (waste and byproducts from industries) corresponds to the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations, preserves resources, saves energy, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Besides traditional material usage, soil stabilization is achievable through various secondary raw materials (listed according to their groups and subgroups): 1. thermally treated waste products: 1.1. ashes from agriculture production; 1.2. ashes from energy production; 1.3. ashes from various manufacturing; 1.4. ashes from waste processing; 1.5. high carbon content pyrolysis products; 2. untreated waste and new products made from secondary raw materials: 2.1. waste from municipal waste biological treatment and landfills; 2.2. waste from industries; 3. new products made from secondary raw materials: 3.1. composite materials. Efficient solutions in environmental engineering may eliminate excessive amounts of waste and support innovation in the circular economy for sustainable future.