Essam Ghamry

Prof. Essam Ghamry

National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Helwan, Egypt
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
EMEmad K. Mohamed
Emad K. Mohamed
Mohamed AbdalzaherMohamed Abdalzaher
Mohamed Abdalzaher
MEMohamed Elwekeil
Mohamed Elwekeil
Dedalo MarchettiDedalo Marchetti
Dedalo Marchetti
AFAdel Fathy
Adel Fathy
Potential earthquake precursors include, among others, electromagnetic fields, gas emissions, Land Surface Temperature (LST), Sea Surface Temperature (SST), and Surface Air Temperature (SAT) anomalies. These observables have been individually studied, before earthquakes, by many researchers. The ionospheric studies concerning earthquakes (EQs) using magnetic data from Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites are increasingly being used to detect ionospheric anomalies before large EQs. Also, LST, SST, and SAT values retrieved from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Terra and Aqua satellites and Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications Version 2 (MERRA-2) are considered as physical precursors before EQs. In this work, we jointly analyze magnetic, MODIS, and MERRA-2 data in space and time around the epicenters before the selected EQs in Mexico, Japan, Chile, and Indonesia. Our analyses present interesting findings where anomalies in temperature and magnetic field, preceding the considered EQs, are confirmed through different methods. Particularly, we utilize the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) for analyzing magnetic data over the designated EQs regions. We use the magnetic data acquired by Swarm satellites in the top side ionosphere along with MODIS and MERRA-2. Five case studies are described to prove the effectiveness of our analyses. Precursory anomalies were observed using these methods in different anomalous days from the considered four regions of interest around the epicenter. It is concluded that these methods could be effective and reliable in detecting anomalies preceding the upcoming EQs.

30 April 2014 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IFI. Fathy
I. Fathy
Christine Amory-MazaudierChristine Amory-Mazaudier
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
AFA. Fathy
A. Fathy
AMAyman Mahrous
Ayman Mahrous
KYK. Yumoto
K. Yumoto
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
In this paper we study the planetary magnetic disturbance during the magnetic storm occurring on 5 April 2010 associated with high‐speed solar wind stream due to a coronal hole following a coronal mass ejection. We separate the magnetic disturbance associated to the ionospheric disturbance dynamo (Ddyn) from the magnetic disturbance associated to the prompt penetration of magnetospheric electric field (DP2). This event exhibits different responses of ionospheric disturbance dynamo in the different longitude sectors (European‐African, Asian, and American). The strongest effect is observed in the European‐African sector. The Ddyn disturbance reduces the amplitude of the daytime H component at low latitudes during four consecutive days in agreement with the Blanc and Richmond's model of ionospheric disturbance dynamo. The amplitude of Ddyn decreased with time during the 4 days. We discuss its diverse worldwide effects. The observed signature of magnetic disturbance process in specific longitude sector is strongly dependent on which Earth's side faces the magnetic storms (i.e., there is a different response depending on which longitude sector is at noon when the SSC hits). Finally, we determined an average period of 22 h for Ddyn using wavelet analysis.

1 May 2011 in Journal of African Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMohamed Abdel Zaher
Mohamed Abdel Zaher
Hakim SAIBIHakim SAIBI
Hakim SAIBI
MNMohamed El Nouby
Mohamed El Nouby
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
SESachio Ehara
Sachio Ehara

1 October 2019 in Advances In Space Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAdel Fathy
Adel Fathy
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
KAKusumita Arora
Kusumita Arora

1 June 2016 in NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
ALAhmed Lethy
Ahmed Lethy
TATareq Arafa-Hamed
Tareq Arafa-Hamed
EEEsmat Abd Elaal
Esmat Abd Elaal
The Geomagnetic storms are considered as one of the major natural hazards. Egyptian geomagnetic observatories observed multiple geomagnetic storms during 18 February to 2 March 2014. During this period, four interplanetary shocks successively hit the Earth’s magnetosphere, leading to four geomagnetic storms. The storm onsets occurred on 18, 20, 23 and 27 February. A non-substorm Pi2 pulsation was observed on 26 February. This Pi2 pulsation was detected in Egyptian observatories (Misallat and Abu Simbel), Kakioka station in Japan and Carson City station in US with nearly identical waveforms. Van Allen Probe missions observed non-compressional Pc4 pulsations on the recovery phase of the third storm. This Pc4 event is may be likely attributed to the decay of the ring current in the recovery phase

13 July 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Khairul Adib YusofKhairul Adib Yusof
Khairul Adib Yusof
MAMardina Abdullah
Mardina Abdullah
Nurul Shazana Abdul HamidNurul Shazana Abdul Hamid
Nurul Shazana Abdul Hamid
SASuaidi Ahadi
Suaidi Ahadi
Essam GhamryEssam Ghamry
Essam Ghamry
Recent studies reported that the diurnal variation of the geomagnetic field exhibited anomalous characteristics several months before earthquakes (EQs). However, the statistical significance of such anomalies detected using the diurnal variation range ratio (DVRR) method still requires verification as only a limited number of EQs occurring in certain seismoactive zones were included. In this study, the DVRR method was employed in conjunction with the superposed epoch analysis (SEA) to perform a large-scale study. A total of 157 EQs that occurred between 2000 and 2019 were investigated using vast geomagnetic field data collected from 92 ground-based magnetometer stations spread across multiple global regions. The case study conducted on the May 13, 2011, M6.1 Honshu (Japan) EQ showed that the diurnal variation of the vertical geomagnetic component disappeared around a week before the EQ. The case study also demonstrated the effectiveness of the DVRR method in minimizing solar disturbance influences, further proving that the observed anomalies were not caused by the Sun. The subsequent SEA revealed statistically significant increases in anomaly counts before the occurrence of EQs for all three geomagnetic components. The number of anomalies gradually increased approaching the day of EQs with temporal lags between the components. Furthermore, a control group analysis confirmed the findings by demonstrating that the increases were not coincidental and several explanations have been suggested, focusing primarily on the emergence and generation mechanisms of the anomalies. Results from this study showed that the anomalies were significant and were potentially precursors to the succeeding EQs.