Without appropriate interventions, prediabetes is typically followed by type II diabetes. Eggs are a rich source of important nutrients including protein, vitamins, minerals, carotenoids and lecithin. In this 12-week, parallel, randomized controlled trial, 42 overweight or obese individuals between the ages of 40 and 75 years with pre- and type II-diabetes were included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either one large egg per day or an equivalent amount of egg substitute for 12 weeks. Blood samples were obtained to analyze lipid profile and biomarkers associated with glycemic control at all time points. Regular egg consumption resulted in improvements of fasting blood glucose, which was significantly (P = 0.05) reduced by 4.4% at the final visit in the egg group. Participants in the egg group had significantly (P = 0.01) lower levels of homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at all visits. In the egg group, ATP-binding cassette protein family A1 (ABCA1) was significantly higher at the 6-week visit (0.78 ± 0.21 vs. 0.28 ± 0.05 mg dL⁻¹, P < 0.001) and tended to be higher at the final visit (0.62 ± 0.11 vs. 0.55 ± 0.18 mg dL⁻¹, P = 0.1). The mean apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1) level was also significantly higher at the final visit in the egg group compared to the control (147.43 ± 5.34 vs. 142.81 ± 5.09 mg dL⁻¹, P = 0.01). There were no significant changes in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Daily consumption of one large egg may reduce the risk of diabetes without having any adverse effects on lipid profiles in individuals with pre- and type II diabetes.

Osteoporosis is a major health concern in aging populations, where 54% of the U.S. population aged 50 and older have low bone mineral density (BMD). Increases in inflammation and oxidative stress play a major role in the development of osteoporosis. Men are at a greater risk of mortality due to osteoporosis-related fractures. Our earlier findings in rodent male and female models of osteoporosis, as well as postmenopausal women strongly suggest the efficacy of prunes (dried plum) in reducing inflammation and preventing/reversing bone loss. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of two doses of prunes, daily, on biomarkers of inflammation and bone metabolism in men with some degree of bone loss (BMD; t-score between −0.1 and −2.5 SD), for three months. Thirty-five men between the ages of 55 and 80 years were randomized into one of three groups: 100 g prunes, 50 g prunes, or control. Consumption of 100 g prunes led to a significant decrease in serum osteocalcin (p < 0.001). Consumption of 50 g prunes led to significant decreases in serum osteoprotegerin (OPG) (p = 0.003) and serum osteocalcin (p = 0.040), and an increase in the OPG:RANKL ratio (p = 0.041). Regular consumption of either 100 g or 50 g prunes for three months may positively affect bone turnover.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality largely due to increased cardiovascular disease risk. This study examined the relationships among protein consumption and sources on glycemic control and cardiovascular health in individuals with prediabetes and T2D. Sixty-two overweight or obese participants with prediabetes or T2D, aged 45–75 years were stratified into the following three groups based on protein intake: <0.8 g (gram)/kg (kilogram) body weight (bw), ≥0.8 but <1.0 g/kg bw, and ≥1.0 g/kg bw as below, meeting, and above the recommended levels of protein intake, respectively. Body mass, body mass index (BMI), hip circumference (HC), waist circumference (WC), lean mass, and fat mass (FM) were significantly higher in participants who consumed below the recommended level of protein intake as compared with other groups. Higher animal protein intake was associated with greater insulin secretion and lower triglycerides (TG). Total, low-density, and high-density cholesterol were significantly higher in participants who met the recommended protein intake as compared with the other groups. These data suggest that high protein consumption is associated with lower BMI, HC, WC, and FM, and can improve insulin resistance without affecting lipid profiles in this population. Furthermore, higher intake of animal protein can improve β-cell function and lower plasma TG.

Background/Objectives: Approximately 53.4 million U.S. adults aged 50 or older have low bone mass, yet male bone health remains under-researched. This study evaluated the effects of one year of prune supplementation on bone health in older men susceptible to, or with, osteopenia. Methods: A total of 59 men (aged 55–80 years) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 100 g prunes, 50 g prunes, or 0 g prunes (control; multivitamin only) daily, with each group also receiving 450 mg elemental calcium and 800 IU vitamin D₃ via a multivitamin. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Lunar model DXA; GE Healthcare, CA, USA) scans and blood samples were collected at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: No significant changes were observed in total bone mineral density (BMD) or lumbar spine BMD over one year. There were no significant changes in C-reactive protein (CRP). Osteoprotegerin (OPG) decreased significantly in all groups; however, the decrease was significantly greater in the control group compared to the levels in both prune groups. Sclerostin (SOST) significantly increased over time within all groups. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRAP5b) increased in all groups, albeit in the control group, it increased significantly more over time compared to the increase in the 100 g group. Conclusions: Overall, prune supplementation, regardless of dosing, did not increase total or lumbar BMD or aid in maintaining bone density beyond the levels achieved by Ca++ and vitamin D₃ supplementation in older men susceptible to, or with, osteopenia (with a negative T-score down to –2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean). Although between-group differences were observed in select secondary biomarkers (OPG, TRAP5b), these did not correspond to detectable changes in BMD and should therefore be considered exploratory rather than directly indicative of clinical bone benefit. Additional research is needed to fully understand the effects of prunes on bone metabolism in men.

Background/Objectives: Approximately 53.4 million U.S. adults aged 50 or older have low bone mass, yet male bone loss remains under-researched. This study evaluated the effects of one year of prune supplementation on bone health in osteopenic men. Methods: Fifty-nine men (55–80 years) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 0 g prune (control), 50 g prune, or 100 g prune daily, along with 450 mg elemental calcium and 800 IU vitamin D₃. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and blood samples were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: No significant changes were observed in total bone mineral density (BMD) over one year. C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in the control group compared to the 50 g group at all time points. Osteo-protegerin (OPG) decreased significantly in all groups, however, the decrease was significantly greater in the control compared to both prune groups. Sclerostin (SOST) significantly increased over time in all groups, albeit to a greater degree in the control group. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRAP5b) increased in the 50 g and control group but remained stable in the 100 g group. Conclusions: Overall, prune supplementation did not improve BMD beyond that of the calcium and vitamin D₃ supplementation however, there was a modest effect on biomarkers of inflammation and bone metabolism.