Bart Lievens

Bart Lievens


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 September 2014 in Environmental Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens
JHJohn Hallsworth
John Hallsworth
MPMaria I. Pozo
Maria I. Pozo
ZBZouhaier Ben Belgacem
Zouhaier Ben Belgacem
ASAndrew Stevenson
Andrew Stevenson
HJHans Jacquemyn
Hans Jacquemyn

14 March 2014 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMichael Waud
Michael Waud
PBPieter Busschaert
Pieter Busschaert
SRStefan Ruyters
Stefan Ruyters
Hans JacquemynHans Jacquemyn
Hans Jacquemyn
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens

1 April 2018 in Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKen Meerbergen
Ken Meerbergen
KWKris A. Willems
Kris A. Willems
Raf DewilRaf Dewil
Raf Dewil
JIJan F.M. Van Impe
Jan F.M. Van Impe
Lise AppelsLise Appels
Lise Appels
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens

13 September 2017 in Biotechnology for Biofuels
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VMVaskar Mukherjee
Vaskar Mukherjee
DRDorota Radecka
Dorota Radecka
GAGuido Aerts
Guido Aerts
KVKevin Verstrepen
Kevin Verstrepen
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens
JTJohan M Thevelein
Johan M Thevelein
Non-conventional yeasts present a huge, yet barely exploited, resource of yeast biodiversity for industrial applications. This presents a great opportunity to explore alternative ethanol-fermenting yeasts that are more adapted to some of the stress factors present in the harsh environmental conditions in second-generation (2G) bioethanol fermentation. Extremely tolerant yeast species are interesting candidates to investigate the underlying tolerance mechanisms and to identify genes that when transferred to existing industrial strains could help to design more stress-tolerant cell factories. For this purpose, we performed a high-throughput phenotypic evaluation of a large collection of non-conventional yeast species to identify the tolerance limits of the different yeast species for desirable stress tolerance traits in 2G bioethanol production. Next, 12 multi-tolerant strains were selected and used in fermentations under different stressful conditions. Five strains out of which, showing desirable fermentation characteristics, were then evaluated in small-scale, semi-anaerobic fermentations with lignocellulose hydrolysates. Our results revealed the phenotypic landscape of many non-conventional yeast species which have not been previously characterized for tolerance to stress conditions relevant for bioethanol production. This has identified for each stress condition evaluated several extremely tolerant non-Saccharomyces yeasts. It also revealed multi-tolerance in several yeast species, which makes those species good candidates to investigate the molecular basis of a robust general stress tolerance. The results showed that some non-conventional yeast species have similar or even better fermentation efficiency compared to S. cerevisiae in the presence of certain stressful conditions. Prior to this study, our knowledge on extreme stress-tolerant phenotypes in non-conventional yeasts was limited to only few species. Our work has now revealed in a systematic way the potential of non-Saccharomyces species to emerge either as alternative host species or as a source of valuable genetic information for construction of more robust industrial S. serevisiae bioethanol production yeasts. Striking examples include yeast species like Pichia kudriavzevii and Wickerhamomyces anomalus that show very high tolerance to diverse stress factors. This large-scale phenotypic analysis has yielded a detailed database useful as a resource for future studies to understand and benefit from the molecular mechanisms underlying the extreme phenotypes of non-conventional yeast species.

8 January 2020 in Fungal Biology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JKJoon Klaps
Joon Klaps
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens
SASergio Alvarez-Perez
Sergio Alvarez-Perez
Flowers offer a wide variety of substrates suitable for fungal growth. However, the mycological study of flowers has only recently begun to be systematically addressed from an ecological point of view. Most research on the topic carried out during the last decade has focused on studying the prevalence and diversity of flower-inhabiting yeasts, describing new species retrieved from floral parts and animal pollinators, and the use of select nectar yeasts as model systems to test ecological hypotheses. In this primer article, we summarize the current state of the art in floral nectar mycology and provide an overview of some research areas that, in our view, still require further attention, such as the influence of fungal volatile organic compounds on the foraging behavior of pollinators and other floral visitors, the analysis of the direct and indirect effects of nectar-inhabiting fungi on the fitness of plants and animals, and the nature and consequences of fungal-bacterial interactions taking place within flowers.

16 July 2018 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Islam S. SobhyIslam S. Sobhy
Islam S. Sobhy
DBDieter Baets
Dieter Baets
TGTim Goelen
Tim Goelen
BHBeatriz Herrera-Malaver
Beatriz Herrera-Malaver
LBLien Bosmans
Lien Bosmans
BLBart Lievens
Bart Lievens
Floral nectar is commonly inhabited by microorganisms, mostly yeasts and bacteria, which can have a strong impact on nectar chemistry and scent. Yet, little is known about the effects of nectar microbes on the behavior and survival of insects belonging to the third trophic level such as parasitoids. Here, we used five nectar-inhabiting yeast species to test the hypothesis that yeast species that almost solely occur in nectar, and therefore substantially rely on floral visitors for dispersal, produce volatile compounds that enhance insect attraction without compromising insect life history parameters, such as survival. Experiments were performed using two nectar specialist yeasts (Metschnikowia gruessii and M. reukaufii) and three generalist species (Aureobasidium pullulans, Hanseniaspora uvarum, and Sporobolomyces roseus). Saccharomyces cerevisiae was included as a reference yeast. We compared olfactory responses of the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi (Haliday) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) when exposed to these microorganisms inoculated in synthetic nectar. Nectar-inhabiting yeasts had a significant impact on nectar chemistry and produced distinct volatile blends, some of which were attractive, while others were neutral or repellent. Among the different yeast species tested, the nectar specialists M. gruessii and M. reukaufii were the only species that produced a highly attractive nectar to parasitoid females, which simultaneously had no adverse effects on longevity and survival of adults. By contrast, parasitoids that fed on nectars fermented with the reference strain, A. pullulans, H. uvarum or S. roseus showed shortest longevity and lowest survival. Additionally, nectars fermented by A. pullulans or S. roseus were consumed significantly less, suggesting a lack of important nutrients or undesirable changes in the nectar chemical profiles. Altogether our results indicate that nectar-inhabiting yeasts play an important, but so far largely overlooked, role in plant-insect interactions by modulating the chemical composition of nectar, and may have important ecological consequences for plant pollination and biological control of herbivorous insects.