R. Timmermans

Dr. R. Timmermans


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 October 2021 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMartin Otto Paul Ramacher
Martin Otto Paul Ramacher
AKANASTASIA KAKOURI
ANASTASIA KAKOURI
OSOrestis Speyer
Orestis Speyer
JFJosefine Feldner
Josefine Feldner
Matthias KarlMatthias Karl
Matthias Karl
EAEleni Athanasopoulou
Eleni Athanasopoulou
As cities are growing in size and complexity, the estimation of air pollution exposure requires a detailed spatial representation of air pollution levels, rather than homogenous fields, provided by global- or regional-scale models. A critical input for city-scale modeling is a timely and spatially resolved emission inventory. Bottom–up approaches to create urban-scale emission inventories can be a demanding and time-consuming task, whereas local emission rates derived from a top–down approach may lack accuracy. In the frame of this study, the UrbEm approach of downscaling gridded emission inventories is developed, investing upon existing, open access, and credible emission data sources. As a proof-of-concept, the regional anthropogenic emissions by Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) are handled with a top–down approach, creating an added-value product of anthropogenic emissions of trace gases and particulate matter for any city (or area) of Europe, at the desired spatial resolution down to 1 km. The disaggregation is based on contemporary proxies for the European area (e.g., Global Human Settlement population data, Urban Atlas 2012, Corine, OpenStreetMap data). The UrbEm approach is realized as a fully automated software tool to produce a detailed mapping of industrial (point), (road-) transport (line), and residential/agricultural/other (area) emission sources. Line sources are of particular value for air quality studies at the urban scale, as they enable explicit treatment of line sources by models capturing among others the street canyon effect and offer an overall better representation of the critical road transport sector. The UrbEm approach is an efficient solution for such studies and constitutes a fully credible option in case high-resolution emission inventories do not exist for a city (or area) of interest. The validity of UrbEm is examined through the evaluation of high-resolution air pollution predictions over Athens and Hamburg against in situ measurements. In addition to a better spatial representation of emission sources and especially hotspots, the air quality modeling results show that UrbEm outputs, when compared to a uniform spatial disaggregation, have an impact on NO2 predictions up to 70% for urban regions with complex topographies, which corresponds to a big improvement of model accuracy (FAC2 > 0.5), especially at the source-impacted sites.

14 October 2019 in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RTR. Timmermans
R. Timmermans
ASArjo Segers
Arjo Segers
LCLyana Curier
Lyana Curier
RARachid Abida
Rachid Abida
JAJean-Luc Attié
Jean-Luc Attié
MSMartijn Schaap
Martijn Schaap
We present an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) dedicated to the evaluation of the added value of the Sentinel-4 and Sentinel-5P missions for tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Sentinel-4 is a geostationary (GEO) mission covering the European continent, providing observations with high temporal resolution (hourly). Sentinel-5P is a low Earth orbit (LEO) mission providing daily observations with a global coverage. The OSSE experiment has been carefully designed, with separate models for the simulation of observations and for the assimilation experiments and with conservative estimates of the total observation uncertainties. In the experiment we simulate Sentinel-4 and Sentinel-5P tropospheric NO2 columns and surface ozone concentrations at 7 by 7 km resolution over Europe for two 3-month summer and winter periods. The synthetic observations are based on a nature run (NR) from a chemistry transport model (MOCAGE) and error estimates using instrument characteristics. We assimilate the simulated observations into a chemistry transport model (LOTOS-EUROS) independent of the NR to evaluate their impact on modelled NO2 tropospheric columns and surface concentrations. The results are compared to an operational system where only ground-based ozone observations are ingested. Both instruments have an added value to analysed NO2 columns and surface values, reflected in decreased biases and improved correlations. The Sentinel-4 NO2 observations with hourly temporal resolution benefit modelled NO2 analyses throughout the entire day where the daily Sentinel-5P NO2 observations have a slightly lower impact that lasts up to 3–6 h after overpass. The evaluated benefits may be even higher in reality as the applied error estimates were shown to be higher than actual errors in the now operational Sentinel-5P NO2 products. We show that an accurate representation of the NO2 profile is crucial for the benefit of the column observations on surface values. The results support the need for having a combination of GEO and LEO missions for NO2 analyses in view of the complementary benefits of hourly temporal resolution (GEO, Sentinel-4) and global coverage (LEO, Sentinel-5P).

27 August 2013 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMartijn Schaap
Martijn Schaap
RKRichard Kranenburg
Richard Kranenburg
LCLyana Curier
Lyana Curier
MJMagdalena Jozwicka
Magdalena Jozwicka
EDEnrico Dammers
Enrico Dammers
RTR. Timmermans
R. Timmermans
The advent of satellite data has provided a source of independent information to monitor trends in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide levels. To interpret these trends, one needs to know the sensitivity of the satellite retrieved NO2 column to anthropogenic emissions. We have applied a chemistry transport model to investigate the sensitivity of the modeled NO2 column, sampled at the OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) overpass time and location and weighted by the OMI averaging kernel, to emission sources across Europe. The most important contribution (~35%) in Western Europe is made by road transport. Off-road transport and industrial combustion each contribute 10%–15% across continental Europe. In Eastern Europe, power plant contributions are of comparable magnitude as those of road transport. To answer the question if the OMI-NO2 trends can be translated directly into emission changes, we assessed the anticipated changes in OMI-NO2 between 2005 and 2020. Although the results indicated that for many countries, it is indeed possible, for medium- and small-sized coastal countries, the contribution of the increasing shipping emissions in adjacent sea areas may mask a significant part of national emission reductions. This study highlights the need for a combined use of models, a priori emission estimates and satellite data to verify emission trends.

28 March 2025
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
RTR. Timmermans
R. Timmermans
GPG. Pfister
G. Pfister
MGM. Guevara
M. Guevara
NHN. Huneeus
N. Huneeus
RKR. Kranenburg
R. Kranenburg
MSM. Schaap
M. Schaap

12 July 2018 in EGUsphere
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GBGuy P. Brasseur
Guy P. Brasseur
YXYing Xie
Ying Xie
APA. Katinka Petersen
A. Katinka Petersen
IBIdir Bouarar
Idir Bouarar
JFJohannes Flemming
Johannes Flemming
GZGuanhqiang Zhou
Guanhqiang Zhou
An operational multi-model forecasting system for air quality including 9 different chemical transport models has been developed and is providing daily forecasts of ozone, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter for the 37 largest urban areas of China (population higher than 3 million in 2010). These individual forecasts as well as the mean and median concentrations for the next 3 days are displayed on a publicly accessible web site (http://www.marcopolo-panda.eu). The paper describes the forecasting system and shows some selected illustrative examples of air quality predictions. It presents an inter-comparison of the different forecasts performed during a given period of time (1–15 March 2017), and highlights recurrent differences between the model output as well as systematic biases that appear in the median concentration values. Pathways to improve the forecasts by the multi-model system are suggested.

17 June 2011
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
RTR. Timmermans
R. Timmermans
HEHenk Eskes
Henk Eskes
PBPeter Builtjes
Peter Builtjes
ASArjo Segers
Arjo Segers
DSDaan Swart
Daan Swart
MSMartijn Schaap
Martijn Schaap