Kalev Sepp

Prof. Kalev Sepp

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 February 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKai-Yun Li
Kai-Yun Li
RLRaul Sampaio de Lima
Raul Sampaio de Lima
Niall G BurnsideNiall G Burnside
Niall G Burnside
EVEle Vahtmäe
Ele Vahtmäe
TKTiit Kutser
Tiit Kutser
KSKalev Sepp
Kalev Sepp
The incorporation of autonomous computation and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into smart agriculture concepts is becoming an expected scientific procedure. The airborne hyperspectral system with its vast area coverage, high spectral resolution, and varied narrow-band selection is an excellent tool for crop physiological characteristics and yield prediction. However, the extensive and redundant three-dimensional (3D) cube data processing and computation have made the popularization of this tool a challenging task. This research integrated two important open-sourced systems (R and Python) combined with automated hyperspectral narrowband vegetation index calculation and the state-of-the-art AI-based automated machine learning (AutoML) technology to estimate yield and biomass, based on three crop categories (spring wheat, pea and oat mixture, and spring barley with red clover) with multifunctional cultivation practices in northern Europe and Estonia. Our study showed the estimated capacity of the empirical AutoML regression model was significant. The best coefficient of determination (R2) and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) for single variety planting wheat were 0.96 and 0.12 respectively; for mixed peas and oats, they were 0.76 and 0.18 in the booting to heading stage, while for mixed legumes and spring barley, they were 0.88 and 0.16 in the reproductive growth stages. In terms of straw mass estimation, R2 was 0.96, 0.83, and 0.86, and NRMSE was 0.12, 0.24, and 0.33 respectively. This research contributes to, and confirms, the use of the AutoML framework in hyperspectral image analysis to increase implementation flexibility and reduce learning costs under a variety of agricultural resource conditions. It delivers expert yield and straw mass valuation two months in advance before harvest time for decision-makers. This study also highlights that the hyperspectral system provides economic and environmental benefits and will play a critical role in the construction of sustainable and intelligent agriculture techniques in the upcoming years.

14 September 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRicardo Martinez Prentice
Ricardo Martinez Prentice
MPMiguel Villoslada Peciña
Miguel Villoslada Peciña
Raymond WardRaymond Ward
Raymond Ward
TBThaisa F. Bergamo
Thaisa F. Bergamo
CJChris B. Joyce
Chris B. Joyce
KSKalev Sepp
Kalev Sepp
High-resolution images obtained by multispectral cameras mounted on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are helping to capture the heterogeneity of the environment in images that can be discretized in categories during a classification process. Currently, there is an increasing use of supervised machine learning (ML) classifiers to retrieve accurate results using scarce datasets with samples with non-linear relationships. We compared the accuracies of two ML classifiers using a pixel and object analysis approach in six coastal wetland sites. The results show that the Random Forest (RF) performs better than K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm in the classification of pixels and objects and the classification based on pixel analysis is slightly better than the object-based analysis. The agreement between the classifications of objects and pixels is higher in Random Forest. This is likely due to the heterogeneity of the study areas, where pixel-based classifications are most appropriate. In addition, from an ecological perspective, as these wetlands are heterogeneous, the pixel-based classification reflects a more realistic interpretation of plant community distribution.

13 May 2022 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NJNikoleta Jones
Nikoleta Jones
JMJames McGinlay
James McGinlay
AKAndreas Kontoleon
Andreas Kontoleon
VMVictoria A. Maguire-Rajpaul
Victoria A. Maguire-Rajpaul
Panayiotis G. DimitrakopoulosPanayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
Frank VanclayFrank Vanclay
Frank Vanclay
Protected Areas are the most widely applied policy tool for biodiversity conservation. In Europe, protected areas are expected to significantly increase as the new EU Biodiversity strategy sets an ambitious target of 30% of land and 30% of water to be protected by 2030. Despite the popularity of this environmental policy, understanding variations in the level of public support for protected areas remains underexplored. This is an important area of research, considering that, in order for protected areas to be effective, they need to be supported by most users, including local communities and visitors. In this paper, we reviewed theoretical and empirical evidence explaining the level of support for protected areas and proposed a new approach when designing and designating protected areas in Europe. This approach models the process of the introduction of a new protected area as a policy intervention within a socio-ecological system. Specifically, it models how protected area social outcomes or impacts are conditioned and contextualised by numerous intervening factors relating to the social context and governance and management system to influence local actors’ attitude and active support for the protected area. This new approach aims to assist policy makers, conservation practitioners and scientists to plan actions that assist in increasing the level of public support for protected areas in the context of the post 2020 Biodiversity Strategy of the European Union.

29 January 2015 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAivar Leito
Aivar Leito
RBRobert Gerald Henry Bunce
Robert Gerald Henry Bunce
MKMart Külvik
Mart Külvik
IOIvar Ojaste
Ivar Ojaste
JRJanar Raet
Janar Raet
KSKalev Sepp
Kalev Sepp

12 August 2021 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KLKai-Yun Li
Kai-Yun Li
Niall G BurnsideNiall G Burnside
Niall G Burnside
RLRaul Sampaio de Lima
Raul Sampaio de Lima
MPMiguel Villoslada Peciña
Miguel Villoslada Peciña
KSKarli Sepp
Karli Sepp
KSKalev Sepp
Kalev Sepp
The recent trend of automated machine learning (AutoML) has been driving further significant technological innovation in the application of artificial intelligence from its automated algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization of the deployable pipeline model for unraveling substance problems. However, a current knowledge gap lies in the integration of AutoML technology and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) within image-based data classification tasks. Therefore, we employed a state-of-the-art (SOTA) and completely open-source AutoML framework, Auto-sklearn, which was constructed based on one of the most widely used ML systems: Scikit-learn. It was combined with two novel AutoML visualization tools to focus particularly on the recognition and adoption of UAS-derived multispectral vegetation indices (VI) data across a diverse range of agricultural management practices (AMP). These include soil tillage methods (STM), cultivation methods (CM), and manure application (MA), and are under the four-crop combination fields (i.e., red clover-grass mixture, spring wheat, pea-oat mixture, and spring barley). Furthermore, they have currently not been efficiently examined and accessible parameters in UAS applications are absent for them. We conducted the comparison of AutoML performance using three other common machine learning classifiers, namely Random Forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN). The results showed AutoML achieved the highest overall classification accuracy numbers after 1200 s of calculation. RF yielded the second-best classification accuracy, and SVM and ANN were revealed to be less capable among some of the given datasets. Regarding the classification of AMPs, the best recognized period for data capture occurred in the crop vegetative growth stage (in May). The results demonstrated that CM yielded the best performance in terms of classification, followed by MA and STM. Our framework presents new insights into plant–environment interactions with capable classification capabilities. It further illustrated the automatic system would become an important tool in furthering the understanding for future sustainable smart farming and field-based crop phenotyping research across a diverse range of agricultural environmental assessment and management applications.

21 April 2023 in Environmental Science & Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JMJames McGinlay
James McGinlay
NJNikoleta Jones
Nikoleta Jones
CMChrisovalantis Malesios
Chrisovalantis Malesios
Panayiotis G. DimitrakopoulosPanayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
Panayiotis G. Dimitrakopoulos
ABAlfie Begley
Alfie Begley
KSKalev Sepp
Kalev Sepp