Frank Vriesekoop

Prof. Frank Vriesekoop

Department of Food Science, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, United Kingdom
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in Food Quality and Preference
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cristino Alberto Gómez LucianoCristino Alberto Gómez Luciano
Cristino Alberto Gómez Luciano
LALuis Kluwe de Aguiar
Luis Kluwe de Aguiar
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop
BUBeatriz Urbano
Beatriz Urbano

1 May 2014 in Food Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZZZijie Zhang
Zijie Zhang
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop
QYQipeng Yuan
Qipeng Yuan
HLHao Liang
Hao Liang

1 November 2014 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWChunxia Wen
Chunxia Wen
QYQipeng Yuan
Qipeng Yuan
HLHao Liang
Hao Liang
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop

12 June 2017 in Beverages
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKClare Kerby
Clare Kerby
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop
There is a wide range of information available on by-product disposal methods used by large national breweries. However, little information is available on the methods of by-product disposal used by craft breweries. An investigation was carried out in which 200+ British craft brewers were contacted, of which 90 craft brewers provided basic information about their brewery operations and by-product disposal. Representatives of eleven breweries were interviewed to provide an in-depth case study of their by-product disposal methods. The research found that urban craft brewers use a wider range of disposal methods compared to rural craft brewers; urban brewers dispose of more waste through sewage and landfill, as well as using external companies, such as bio-recycling and anaerobic digester plants, whereas rural brewers have relationships with farmers who dispose of the by-products in various ways. Craft brewers tend to have a direct relationship with the by-product users. Even though they do not have all disposal options available to them which the large industrial breweries have, due to their small scale of by-product production, craft brewers appear to find alternative means of sustainability.

14 September 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WKWim de Koning
Wim de Koning
David L DeanDavid L Dean
David L Dean
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop
LALuis Kluwe de Aguiar
Luis Kluwe de Aguiar
MAMartin Anderson
Martin Anderson
ABAnouk Boereboom
Anouk Boereboom
Insects as an alternative protein source has gained traction for its advantageous environmental impact. Despite being part of many traditional food cultures, insects remain a novelty in Western cultures and a challenging concept for many. Even though plant-based protein alternatives are not facing the same barriers, product unfamiliarity and limited exposure hinder adoption, which could be detrimental to growth within the food sector. This study is aimed at evaluating plant- and insect-based proteins as alternative dietary proteins. A model indicating the drivers of consumer attitudes towards meat-alternative proteins and consumer willingness to try, buy, and pay a premium was tested. Further, 3091 responses were collected using surveys in nine countries: China, USA, France, UK, New Zealand, Netherlands, Brazil, Spain, and the Dominican Republic. Structural Equation Modelling was used to analyze the data. We found that consumer’s behavioral intentions towards both plant-based and insect-based alternatives are inhibited by food neophobia but to an extent, are amplified by the perceived suitability and benefits of the protein, which in turn are driven by nutritional importance, environmental impact, healthiness, and sensory attributes for both alternatives. The expectation of the nutritional value of meat is the strongest (negative) influence on perceived suitability/benefits of plant-based protein and willingness to try, buy, and pay more for plant-based proteins, but it only has a relatively small impact on the suitability/benefits of insect-based protein and no impact on willingness to try, buy, and pay more for insect-based proteins. Overall, we conclude that consumer adoption towards meat alternatives is complex and is strengthened by the perceived suitability/benefits of the protein and general importance of perceived food healthiness and sustainability. Conversely, adoption is hindered by dietary factors and the experiential importance of meat and food neophobia.

1 December 2012 in Journal of the Institute of Brewing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Frank VriesekoopFrank Vriesekoop
Frank Vriesekoop
MKMoritz Krahl
Moritz Krahl
BHBarry Hucker
Barry Hucker
GMGarry Menz
Garry Menz
Beer is a beverage that is produced in a multistage process, where some stages of that process are intentionally influenced by microorganisms, while at other stages of the production process microorganisms are actively discouraged. Most of the intentional microbial activity is facilitated by yeast; however bacteria also play an influential role in beer production. This paper will describe the beneficial role of bacteria in the beer production process (the Good), but will also pay due attention to the negative influences bacteria might have on the quality of beer as a commodity (the Bad), and the properties of beer that have given it the status of an inherently safe food for human consumption with regards to disease-causing bacteria (the Ugly). Copyright © 2013 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling