How to differentiate with MRI-based techniques testicular germ (TGCTs) and testicular non-germ cell tumors (TNGCTs) is still under debate and Radiomics may be the turning key. Our purpose is to investigate the performance of MRI-based Radiomics signatures for the preoperative prediction of testicular neoplasm histology. The aim is twofold: (i), differentiating TGCTs and TNGCTs status and (ii) differentiating seminomas (SGCTs) from non-seminomatous (NSGCTs). Forty-two patients with pathology-proven testicular neoplasms and referred for pre-treatment MRI, were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty-two out of 44 lesions were TGCTs. Twelve out of 44 were TNGCTs or other histologies. Two radiologists segmented the volume of interest on T2-weighted images. Approximately 500 imaging features were extracted. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was applied as method for variable selection. A linear model and a linear support vector machine (SVM) were trained with selected features to assess discrimination scores for the two endpoints. LASSO identified 3 features that were employed to build fivefold validated linear discriminant and linear SVM classifiers for the TGCT-TNGCT endpoint giving an overall accuracy of 89%. Four features were employed to build another SVM for the SGCT-SNGCT endpoint with an overall accuracy of 86%. The data obtained proved that T2-weighted-based Radiomics is a promising tool in the diagnostic workup of testicular neoplasms by discriminating germ cell from non-gem cell tumors, and seminomas from non-seminomas.

Prostate cancer (PCa) risk categorization based on clinical/PSA testing results in a substantial number of men being overdiagnosed with indolent, early-stage PCa. Clinically non-significant PCa is characterized as the presence of ISUP grade one, where PCa is found in no more than two prostate biopsy cores.MRI-ADC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET have been proposed as tools to predict ISUP grade one patients and consequently reduce overdiagnosis. In this study, Radiomics analysis is applied to MRI-ADC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET maps to quantify tumor characteristics and predict histology-proven ISUP grades. ICC was applied with a threshold of 0.6 to assess the features’ stability with variations in contouring. Logistic regression predictive models based on imaging features were trained on 31 lesions to differentiate ISUP grade one patients from ISUP two+ patients. The best model based on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET returned a prediction efficiency of 95% in the training phase and 100% in the test phase whereas the best model based on MRI-ADC had an efficiency of 100% in both phases. Employing both imaging modalities, prediction efficiency was 100% in the training phase and 93% in the test phase. Although our patient cohort was small, it was possible to assess that both imaging modalities add information to the prediction models and show promising results for further investigations.

The initial favorable efficacy and safety profile for Alpha DaRT have been demonstrated (NCT04377360); however, the longer-term safety and durability of the treatment are unknown. This pooled analysis of four prospective trials evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of Alpha DaRT for the treatment of head and neck or skin tumors. A total of 81 lesions in 71 patients were treated across six international institutions, with a median follow-up of 14.1 months (range: 2–51 months). Alpha DaRT sources were delivered via a percutaneous interstitial technique and placed to irradiate the tumor volume with the margin. The sources were removed two to three weeks following implantation. A complete response was observed in 89% of treated lesions (n = 72) and a partial response in 10% (n = 8). The two-year actuarial local recurrence-free survival was 77% [95% CI 63–87]. Variables, including recurrent versus non-recurrent lesions, baseline tumor size, or histology, did not impact long-term outcomes. Twenty-seven percent of patients developed related acute grade 2 or higher toxicities, which resolved with conservative measures. No grade 2 or higher late toxicities were observed. These data support the favorable safety profile of Alpha DaRT, which is currently being explored in a pivotal US trial.

The purpose of this study is to discuss how to use an external radio-opaque template in the Diffusing Alpha-emitters Radiation Therapy (DaRT) technique’s pre-planning and treatment stages. This device would help to determine the proper number of sources for tumour coverage, accounting for subcutaneous invasion and augmenting DaRT safety. The procedure will be carried out in a first phase on a phantom and then applied to a clinical case. A typical DaRT procedure workflow comprises steps like tumour measurements and delineation, source number assessment, and therapy administration. As a first step, an adhesive fiberglass mesh (spaced by 2 mm) tape was applied on the skin of the patient and employed as frame of reference. A physician contoured the lesion and marked the entrance points for the needles with a radio opaque ink marker. According to the radio opaque marks and metabolic uptake the clinical target volume was defined, and with a commercial brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) it was possible to simulate and adjust the spatial seeds distribution. After the implant procedure a CT was again performed to check the agreement between simulations and seeds positions. With the procedure described above it was possible to simulate a DaRT procedure on a phantom in order to train physicians and subsequently apply the novel approach on patients, outlining the major issues involved in the technique. The present work innovates and supports DaRT technique for the treatment of cutaneous cancers, improving its efficacy and safety.

This study aims to investigate and compare High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) treatment plans. The focus is on small target volumes near radiation-sensitive organs in the ocular region, to evaluate the advantages of these techniques in treating skin cancer. This retrospective observational analysis included patients who underwent skin cancer HDR-BT Freiburg flap treatment between 2019 and 2023. An expert radiation oncologist contoured the planning target volumes (PTVs) and marked their visible extension with a radio-opaque tin wire. Each patient had two treatment plans: an individually shaped HDR-BT surface mold and an HT calculation used specifically for this study. Quality assurance of treatment plan was performed in both HDR-BT and HT. The plans were then compared using organ at risk (OAR) maximum doses and the conformity index CI. Radiation oncologists assessed their quality using their routine workflow evaluation plan. Twelve patients were selected for the inclusion in this study. HT provided more consistent target coverage than HDR-BT, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) at t-test. HT showed higher CIs and maximum dose for the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and lens in the homolateral part. Radiation oncologists preferred the overall quality of HT treatment due to its superior PTV coverage, especially for convex surfaces, while maintaining effective OAR sparing. HDR-BT is preferred when concave surfaces are present. HT offers more conformal treatment, although some OAR parameters are statistically significantly better with HDR-BT, which may also be superior for complex geometries.