Lorenzo Castelli

Prof. Lorenzo Castelli

University of Trieste, Trieste, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 August 2008 in Annals of Operations Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
PRPesenti Raffaele
Pesenti Raffaele
WUWalter Ukovich
Walter Ukovich

30 June 2015 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BBBigomokero Antoine Bagula
Bigomokero Antoine Bagula
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
Marco ZennaroMarco Zennaro
Marco Zennaro
Smart parking is a typical IoT application that can benefit from advances in sensor, actuator and RFID technologies to provide many services to its users and parking owners of a smart city. This paper considers a smart parking infrastructure where sensors are laid down on the parking spots to detect car presence and RFID readers are embedded into parking gates to identify cars and help in the billing of the smart parking. Both types of devices are endowed with wired and wireless communication capabilities for reporting to a gateway where the situation recognition is performed. The sensor devices are tasked to play one of the three roles: (1) slave sensor nodes located on the parking spot to detect car presence/absence; (2) master nodes located at one of the edges of a parking lot to detect presence and collect the sensor readings from the slave nodes; and (3) repeater sensor nodes, also called “anchor” nodes, located strategically at specific locations in the parking lot to increase the coverage and connectivity of the wireless sensor network. While slave and master nodes are placed based on geographic constraints, the optimal placement of the relay/anchor sensor nodes in smart parking is an important parameter upon which the cost and efficiency of the parking system depends. We formulate the optimal placement of sensors in smart parking as an integer linear programming multi-objective problem optimizing the sensor network engineering efficiency in terms of coverage and lifetime maximization, as well as its economic gain in terms of the number of sensors deployed for a specific coverage and lifetime. We propose an exact solution to the node placement problem using single-step and two-step solutions implemented in the Mosel language based on the Xpress-MPsuite of libraries. Experimental results reveal the relative efficiency of the single-step compared to the two-step model on different performance parameters. These results are consolidated by simulation results, which reveal that our solution outperforms a random placement in terms of both energy consumption, delay and throughput achieved by a smart parking network.

1 March 2017 in Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPaola Pellegrini
Paola Pellegrini
TBTatjana Bolić
Tatjana Bolić
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
RPRaffaele Pesenti
Raffaele Pesenti

1 August 2011 in Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
PRPesenti Raffaele
Pesenti Raffaele
ARAndrea Ranieri
Andrea Ranieri

16 June 2004 in European Journal of Operational Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
PRPesenti Raffaele
Pesenti Raffaele
WUWalter Ukovich
Walter Ukovich

1 January 2012 in International Journal of Revenue Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorenzo CastelliLorenzo Castelli
Lorenzo Castelli
Paola PellegriniPaola Pellegrini
Paola Pellegrini
PRPesenti Raffaele
Pesenti Raffaele
One of the main principles of the current airport slot allocation mechanism in Europe is based on the existence of historical (also called grandfather) rights granted to airlines for using such slots. Through an experimental analysis, we quantitatively show that the system disutility (i.e. the sum of the costs of the individual airlines due to the imbalance between demand and capacity at airports) is higher when grandfather rights (GFRs) are present. Moreover, we consider the interdependence of slots at different airports and we introduce the possibility to fairly redistribute such costs among airlines through monetary compensations. Our results suggest that it is possible to remove GFRs without significantly penalising airlines which own them.