Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI) is used to treat pulmonary stenosis (PS) or pulmonary regurgitation (PR). We described our experience with PPVI, specifically valve-in-valve transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement using the Melody valve and novel self-expandable systems using the Pulsta valve. We reviewed data from 42 patients undergoing PPVI. Twenty-nine patients had Melody valves in mostly bioprosthetic valves, valved conduits, and homografts in the pulmonary position. Following Melody valve implantation, the peak right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery gradient decreased from 51.3 ± 11.5 to 16.7 ± 3.3 mmHg and right ventricular systolic pressure fell from 70.0 ± 16.8 to 41.3 ± 17.8 mmHg. Thirteen patients with native right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) lesions and homograft underwent PPVI with the new self-expandable Pulsta valve—a nitinol wire stent mounted with a trileaflet porcine pericardial valve. Following Pulsta valve implantation, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed a decreased PR fraction and that the right ventricular end-diastolic volume index decreased from 166.1 ± 11.9 to 123.6 ± 12.4 mL/m2. There were no mortality, severe procedural morbidity, or valve-related complications. At the mean 14.2 month (4–57 months) follow-up, no patients had more than mild PR. PPVI using Melody and Pulsta valves was first shown to provide excellent early outcomes without serious adverse event in most patients with RVOT dysfunction in Korea.
11 February 2024 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Background: Although the transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect was established as the treatment of choice several decades ago, the process of device neoendothelialization (NE) in humans is not well understood. We aimed to measure the extent of device NE using cardiac computed tomography angiography and analyze its risk factors. Methods: Between January 2005 and February 2021, we retrospectively reviewed 164 devices of 112 patients on cardiac computed tomography angiography. We investigated device shape, contrast opacification within the device that differentiated device NE, and device-related thrombosis or vegetation. Risk factor analysis for major adverse cardiovascular events and incomplete NE according to the postprocedural period was performed. Results: Seventy patients (62.5%) were women, with a median (range) age at the time of device closure of 44.5 (0.6–79.2) years. The mean (±SD) defect size was 16.6 (±7.8) mm, and patients were followed for 35.9±33.9 months. After 6 months of device implantation, 35% of the devices (42/120) had incomplete NE. The intensity of intradevice opacification shifted from complete to partial or nonopacification over time ( P <0.001), and a similar pattern was observed in the shunt flow ( P <0.001). The bulkiness of devices also decreased in proportion to the postprocedural period ( P <0.001). Risk analysis revealed device diameter (hazard ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.04–1.27]; P <0.001) as the only significant factor of incomplete NE and major adverse events. Conclusions: Incomplete NE of atrial septal defect devices was identified on cardiac computed tomography angiography in significant numbers after 6 months of the procedure. The device diameter was related to incomplete NE and major adverse events. Further prospective and multicenter studies are warranted to validate this new assessment of device NE.