Background: “DeepFakes” are synthetic performances created by AI, using neural networks to exchange faces in images and modify voices. Objective: Due to the novelty and limited literature on its risks/benefits, this paper aims to determine how young nursing students perceive DeepFake technology, its ethical implications, and its potential benefits in nursing. Methods: This qualitative study used thematic content analysis (the Braun and Clarke method) with videos recorded by 50 third-year nursing students, who answered three questions about DeepFake technology. The data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti (version 22), and the project was approved by the Ethics Committee (code UCV/2021–2022/116). Results: Data analysis identified 21 descriptive codes, classified into four main themes: advantages, disadvantages, health applications, and ethical dilemmas. Benefits noted by students include use in diagnosis, patient accompaniment, training, and learning. Perceived risks include cyberbullying, loss of identity, and negative psychological impacts from unreal memories. Conclusions: Nursing students see both pros and cons in DeepFake technology and are aware of the ethical dilemmas it poses. They also identified promising healthcare applications that could enhance nurses’ leadership in digital health, stressing the importance of regulation and education to fully leverage its potential.

Nursing students and professionals are exposed to highly stressful clinical situations. However, when confronted with stress, which is exacerbated by academic and professional situations, there is a great disparity between those who do not know how to respond suitably to the demands from patients or teachers due to a lack of competence and personal resistance, and those who are more resilient and develop a greater range of strengths. This research aims to analyse the validity and psychometric characteristics of a questionnaire on resilience adapted to Spanish nursing bachelor’s degree students. The participants were 434 undergraduate nursing students from the province of Valencia (Spain) between 17 and 54 years of age (Mean, M = 21; Standard Deviation, SD = 0.320), 104 of whom were men (24%) and 330 women (76%). A cross-sectional group evaluation was carried out in the university itself, adhering to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. Based on the descriptive, factorial, exploratory and confirmatory analyses, it was possible to confirm the suitability of the questionnaire and its adaptation to nursing students. The model is thus suitable for evaluating the population under study. Furthermore, there are statistically significant differences depending on age and gender. The results show that the questionnaire analysed is suited to evaluating resilience among Spanish nursing students, thereby justifying the adaptation of a scale of this nature to foster resilience among nursing students and nurses in professional life, who are exposed to critical situations with patients’ suffering, deterioration or death. Our study highlights important practical implications: Spanish nursing studies involve theory and practice, but students and nurses in professional life have to confront critical situations of patients’ suffering, deterioration, or death. These situations cause stress and feelings of impotence that may lead to chronic stress and even suicidal thoughts.

The conventional approach to sustainability is being extended through approaches such as the psychology of sustainability and sustainable development. Under such approaches, the analysis of sustainability also involves understanding improvements in people’s quality of life in environments such as education and learning. Based on this theoretical approach, this study explored the relationships between anxiety, emotional intelligence, and mechanisms for coping with stressful situations. The mediating role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between anxiety and coping mechanisms was also assessed. The anxiety, emotional intelligence, and coping variables were measured using standardized tests administered to students. This cross-sectional study was based on self-reports by health students at universities in Valencia (Spain). The study conformed to the ethical standards established by the Declaration of Helsinki. In total, 434 students participated in the study. The students were aged between 17 and 54 years (M = 21; SD = 0.320). From the perspective of the psychology of sustainability, the results indicate that avoidance coping strategies are positively related to anxiety and are negatively related to emotional intelligence. However, the results also show that approach coping strategies are positively related to emotional intelligence. In addition, the analysis shows the mediating role of emotional intelligence in the relationship between anxiety and coping. This study shows the need to encourage the sustainable development of emotional intelligence among health professionals and to consider this sustainable development when designing education programs for health-related fields.

Introduction: Promoting healthy lifestyle habits during adolescence is a public health priority due to its influence on the prevention of chronic diseases and long-term well-being. Peer education–based interventions have shown promise in educational settings; however, evidence regarding their feasibility and acceptability in Latin American school contexts remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the educational intervention “Healthy Lifestyle Habits: Learning to Act”, developed within the framework of the Prosalud® Strategy, among secondary school students in Colombia. Methods: A mixed-methods exploratory feasibility study was conducted with 31 lower and upper secondary school students (Grades 9–11) recruited through convenience sampling. The intervention was based on peer education and included educational and experiential activities aimed at promoting healthy habits related to physical activity and nutrition. Feasibility was assessed through indicators of recruitment, retention, procedural viability, and preliminary response. Acceptability was evaluated using a five-point Likert-scale survey and open-ended questions. Descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. Results: Of the 51 students initially interested, 40 formally enrolled in the study (78.4%), and 31 completed the intervention (retention rate: 77.5%). Procedures and assessment instruments proved feasible, with no relevant difficulties in administration or comprehension. Acceptability was high, particularly regarding technological resources (94.3%), physical facilities (91.4%), and mentoring quality (85.7%). Participants positively valued both the activities and the knowledge gained. Additionally, 74% improved or maintained their knowledge of healthy lifestyle habits following the intervention. Conclusions: The intervention demonstrated adequate feasibility and high acceptability within the evaluated school setting. These findings support the implementation of pilot studies aimed at assessing its effectiveness.