Nikolaos S. Bartsotas

Dr. Nikolaos S. Bartsotas

1. BEYOND Center of Earth Observation Research and Satellite Remote Sensing, Space Applications and Remote Sensing, Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Observatory of Athens, 118 10 Athens, Greece
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 December 2017 in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ATAlexandra Tsekeri
Alexandra Tsekeri
ALAnton Lopatin
Anton Lopatin
VAVassilis Amiridis
Vassilis Amiridis
EMEleni Marinou
Eleni Marinou
JIJulia Igloffstein
Julia Igloffstein
Oleg DubovikOleg Dubovik
Oleg Dubovik
The Generalized Aerosol Retrieval from Radiometer and Lidar Combined data algorithm (GARRLiC) and the LIdar-Radiometer Inversion Code (LIRIC) provide the opportunity to study the aerosol vertical distribution by combining ground-based lidar and sun-photometric measurements. Here, we utilize the capabilities of both algorithms for the characterization of Saharan dust and marine particles, along with their mixtures, in the south-eastern Mediterranean during the CHARacterization of Aerosol mixtures of Dust and Marine origin Experiment (CHARADMExp). Three case studies are presented, focusing on dust-dominated, marine-dominated and dust–marine mixing conditions. GARRLiC and LIRIC achieve a satisfactory characterization for the dust-dominated case in terms of particle microphysical properties and concentration profiles. The marine-dominated and the mixture cases are more challenging for both algorithms, although GARRLiC manages to provide more detailed microphysical retrievals compared to AERONET, while LIRIC effectively discriminates dust and marine particles in its concentration profile retrievals. The results are also compared with modelled dust and marine concentration profiles and surface in situ measurements.

18 May 2018 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNikolaos S. Bartsotas
Nikolaos S. Bartsotas
EAE. N. Anagnostou
E. N. Anagnostou
ENEfthymios Nikolopoulos
Efthymios Nikolopoulos
George KallosGeorge Kallos
George Kallos
The estimation of heavy precipitation events is a particularly difficult task, especially over high mountainous terrain typically associated with scant availability of in situ observations. Therefore, quantification of precipitation variability in such data‐limited regions relies on remote sensing estimates, due to their global coverage and near real‐time availability. However, strong underestimation of precipitation associated with low‐level orographic enhancement often limits the quantitative use of these data in applications. This study utilizes state‐of‐the‐art numerical weather prediction simulations, toward the reduction of quantitative errors in satellite precipitation estimates and an insight on the nature of detection limitations. Satellite precipitation products based on different retrieval algorithms (Climate Prediction Center morphing method, Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks‐Cloud Classification System, and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation) are evaluated for their performance in a number of storm events over mountainous areas with distinct storm characteristics: Upper Blue Nile in Ethiopia and Alto Adige in NE Italy. High‐resolution (1 and 2 km) simulations from the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System/Integrated Community Limited Area Modeling System are used to derive adjustments to the magnitude of satellite estimates. Finally, a microphysical investigation is presented for occurrences of erroneous precipitation detection from the satellite instruments. Statistical indexes showcase improvement in numerical weather prediction‐adjusted satellite products and microphysical commodities among cases of no detection are discussed.

22 June 2021 in Climate
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Platon PatlakasPlaton Patlakas
Platon Patlakas
CSChristos Stathopoulos
Christos Stathopoulos
HELENA FLOCASHELENA FLOCAS
HELENA FLOCAS
NBNikolaos S. Bartsotas
Nikolaos S. Bartsotas
George KallosGeorge Kallos
George Kallos
The Arabian Peninsula is a region characterized by diverse climatic conditions due to its location and geomorphological characteristics. Its precipitation patterns are characterized by very low annual amounts with great seasonal and spatial variability. Moreover, extreme events often lead to flooding and pose threat to human life and activities. Towards a better understanding of the spatiotemporal features of precipitation in the region, a thirty-year (1986-2015) climatic analysis has been prepared with the aid of the state-of-the-art numerical modeling system RAMS/ICLAMS. Its two-way interactive nesting capabilities, explicit cloud microphysical schemes with seven categories of hydrometeors and the ability to handle dust aerosols as predictive quantities are significant advantages over an area where dust is a dominant factor. An extended evaluation based on in situ measurements and satellite records revealed a good model behavior. The analysis was performed in three main components; the mean climatic characteristics, the rainfall trends and the extreme cases. The extremes are analyzed under the principles of the extreme value theory, focusing not only on the duration but also on the intensity of the events. The annual and monthly rainfall patterns are investigated and discussed. The spatial distribution of the precipitation trends revealed insignificant percentage differences in the examined period. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the eastern part and the top half of the western Arabian Peninsula presented the lowest risk associated with extreme events. Apart from the pure scientific interest, the present study provides useful information for different sectors of society and economy, such as civil protection, constructions and reinsurance.

27 October 2023 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Stavros SolomosStavros Solomos
Stavros Solomos
CSChristos Spyrou
Christos Spyrou
ÁBÁFRICA BARRETO
ÁFRICA BARRETO
Sergio RodríguezSergio Rodríguez
Sergio Rodríguez
YRYenny Gonzalez Ramos
Yenny Gonzalez Ramos
Christos ZerefosChristos Zerefos
Christos Zerefos
The mineralogical composition of airborne dust particles is an important but often neglected parameter for several physiochemical processes, such as atmospheric radiative transfer and ocean biochemistry. We present the development of the METAL-WRF module for the simulation of the composition of desert dust minerals in atmospheric aerosols. The new development is based on the GOCART-AFWA dust module of WRF-Chem. A new wet deposition scheme has been implemented in the dust module alongside the existing dry deposition scheme. The new model includes separate prognostic fields for nine (9) minerals: illite, kaolinite, smectite, calcite, quartz, feldspar, hematite, gypsum, and phosphorus, derived from the GMINER30 database and also iron derived from the FERRUM30 database. Two regional model sensitivity studies are presented for dust events that occurred in August and December 2017, which include a comparison of the model versus elemental dust composition measurements performed in the North Atlantic (at Izaña Observatory, Tenerife Island) and in the eastern Mediterranean (at Agia Marina Xyliatos station, Cyprus Island). The results indicate the important role of dust minerals, as dominant aerosols, for the greater region of North Africa, South Europe, the North Atlantic, and the Middle East, including the dry and wet depositions away from desert sources. Overall, METAL-WRF was found to be capable of reproducing the relative abundances of the different dust minerals in the atmosphere. In particular, the concentration of iron (Fe), which is an important element for ocean biochemistry and solar absorption, was modeled in good agreement with the corresponding measurements at Izaña Observatory (22% overestimation) and at Agia Marina Xyliatos site (4% overestimation). Further model developments, including the implementation of newer surface mineralogical datasets, e.g., from the NASA-EMIT satellite mission, can be implemented in the model to improve its accuracy.

2 March 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAlexis Apostolakis
Alexis Apostolakis
SGStella Girtsou
Stella Girtsou
GGGiorgos Giannopoulos
Giorgos Giannopoulos
NBNikolaos S. Bartsotas
Nikolaos S. Bartsotas
CKCharalampos (Haris) Kontoes
Charalampos (Haris) Kontoes
Next day wildfire prediction is an open research problem with significant environmental, social, and economic impact since it can produce methods and tools directly exploitable by fire services, assisting, thus, in the prevention of fire occurrences or the mitigation of their effects. It consists in accurately predicting which areas of a territory are at higher risk of fire occurrence each next day, exploiting solely information obtained up until the previous day. The task’s requirements in spatial granularity and scale of predictions, as well as the extreme imbalance of the data distribution render it a rather demanding and difficult to accurately solve the problem. This is reflected in the current literature, where most existing works handle a simplified or limited version of the problem. Taking into account the above problem specificities, in this paper, we present a machine learning methodology that effectively (sensitivity > 90%, specificity > 65%) and efficiently performs next day fire prediction, in rather high spatial granularity and in the scale of a country. The key points of the proposed approach are summarized in: (a) the utilization of an extended set of fire driving factors (features), including topography-related, meteorology-related and Earth Observation (EO)-related features, as well as historical information of areas’ proneness to fire occurrence; (b) the deployment of a set of state-of-the-art classification algorithms that are properly tuned/optimized on the setting; (c) two alternative cross-validation schemes along with custom validation measures that allow the optimal and sound training of classification models, as well as the selection of different models, in relation to the desired trade-off between sensitivity (ratio of correctly identified fire areas) and specificity (ratio of correctly identified non-fire areas). In parallel, we discuss pitfalls, intuitions, best practices, and directions for further investigation derived from our analysis and experimental evaluation.

25 May 2022 in Atmosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristos Spyrou
Christos Spyrou
Stavros SolomosStavros Solomos
Stavros Solomos
NBNikolaos S. Bartsotas
Nikolaos S. Bartsotas
KDKostas Douvis
Kostas Douvis
SNSlobodan Nickovic
Slobodan Nickovic
We present the development of a physically-based dust source map for the GOCART-AFWA dust module in WRF-Chem model. The new parameterization is based on MODIS-NDVI and an updated emission strength map is computed every 15 days from the latest satellite observations. Modeling simulations for the period April–May 2017 over the Mediterranean, north Africa, and the Middle East are compared with observations of AOD at 31 AERONET stations. The new module is capable of reproducing the dust sources at finer detail. The overall performance of the model is improved, especially for stronger dust episodes with AOD > 0.25. For this threshold the model BIAS decreases from −0.20 to −0.02, the RMSE from 0.38 to 0.30, the Correlation Coefficient improves from 0.21 to 0.47, the fractional gross error (FGE) from 0.62 to 0.40, and the mean fractional bias (MFB) from −0.49 to −0.08. Similar improvement is also found for the lower AOD thresholds (>0.0 and >0.1), especially for the stations in Europe, the Mediterranean, Sahel, the Middle East, and Arabian Peninsula, which are mostly affected by dust transport during the experimental period. An overprediction of AOD, compared to the original dust-source scheme, is found for some stations in the Sahara desert, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Iberian Peninsula. In total, 124 out of the 170 statistical scores that are calculated indicate improvement of model performance.