Yan Su

Prof. Yan Su


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 February 2020 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChunlai Li
Chunlai Li
YSYan Su
Yan Su
EPElena Pettinelli
Elena Pettinelli
SXShuguo Xing
Shuguo Xing
Chunyu DingChunyu Ding
Chunyu Ding
HZHongbo Zhang
Hongbo Zhang
The complex stratigraphic structure of the Moon's farside imaged for the first time using subsurface radar.

1 December 2014 in Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSYan Su
Yan Su
GFGuang-You Fang
Guang-You Fang
JFJian-Qing Feng
Jian-Qing Feng
SXShu-Guo Xing
Shu-Guo Xing
YJYi-Cai Ji
Yi-Cai Ji
CLChun-Lai Li
Chun-Lai Li

6 December 2021 in Nature Astronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJliu jianjun
liu jianjun
CLChunlai Li
Chunlai Li
RZRongqiao Zhang
Rongqiao Zhang
WRWei Rao
Wei Rao
XCXiaofeng Cui
Xiaofeng Cui
HZHongbo Zhang
Hongbo Zhang
As part of the Tianwen-1 mission, the Zhurong rover successfully touched down in southern Utopia Planitia on 15 May 2021. On the basis of the new sub-metre-resolution images from the High Resolution Imaging Camera on board the Tianwen-1 orbiter, we determined that the Zhurong rover landed at 109.925° E, 25.066° N at an elevation of −4,099.4 m. The landing site is near the highland–lowland boundary1 and multiple suspected shorelines2–7. Under the guidance of the remote sensing survey, the Zhurong rover is travelling south for specific in situ investigation. Supported by the six payloads on board the rover8, its initial key targets are rocks, rocky fields, transverse aeolian ridges and subsurface structures along the path. Extended investigation will aim at troughs and cones in the distance. A better understanding of the formation mechanisms of these targets may shed light on the historical volcanism and water/ice activities within the landing area, as well as the activities of the wind. These results may reveal the characteristics and evolution of the ancient Martian environment and advance the exploration of the habitability of ancient Mars.

14 June 2022 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LJliu jianjun
liu jianjun
BLBin Liu
Bin Liu
XRxin ren
xin ren
CLChunlai Li
Chunlai Li
RSRong Shu
Rong Shu
ZOZiyuan Ouyang
Ziyuan Ouyang
The distribution range, time-varying characteristics, and sources of lunar water are still controversial. Here we show the Chang’E-5 in-situ spectral observations of lunar water under Earth’s magnetosphere shielding and relatively high temperatures. Our results show the hydroxyl contents of lunar soils in Chang’E-5 landing site are with a mean value of 28.5 ppm, which is on the weak end of lunar hydration features. This is consistent with the predictions from remote sensing and ground-based telescopic data. Laboratory analysis of the Chang’E-5 returned samples also provide critical clues to the possible sources of these hydroxyl contents. Much less agglutinate glass contents suggest a weak contribution of solar wind implantation. Besides, the apatite present in the samples can provide hydroxyl contents in the range of 0 to 179 ± 13 ppm, which shows compelling evidence that, the hydroxyl-containing apatite may be an important source for the excess hydroxyl observed at this young mare region.

25 October 2017 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLChunlai Li
Chunlai Li
SXShuguo Xing
Shuguo Xing
SLSebastian Lauro
Sebastian Lauro
YSYan Su
Yan Su
SDShun Dai
Shun Dai
EPElena Pettinelli
Elena Pettinelli
Chang'e-3 (CE-3) has been the first spacecraft to soft land on the moon since the Soviet Union's Luna 24 in 1976. The spacecraft arrived at Mare Imbrium on December 14, 2013, and the same day, Yutu lunar rover separated from lander to start its exploration of the surface and the subsurface around the landing site. The rover was equipped, among other instruments, with two lunar penetrating radar systems having a working frequency of 60 and 500 MHz. The radars acquired data for about two weeks while the rover was slowly moving along a path of about 114 m. At navigation point N0209, the rover got stacked into the lunar soil and after that only data at a fixed position could be collected. The low-frequency radar data have been analyzed by different authors and published in two different papers, which reported totally controversial interpretations of the radar cross sections. This paper is devoted to resolve such controversy by carefully analyzing and comparing the data collected on the moon by Yutu rover and on earth by a prototype of LPR mounted onboard a model of the CE-3 lunar rover. Such analysis demonstrates that the deep radar features previously ascribed to the lunar shallow stratigraphy are not real reflectors, rather they are signal artifacts probably generated by the system and its electromagnetic interaction with the metallic rover.

31 January 2022 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYan Su
Yan Su
RWRuigang Wang
Ruigang Wang
XDXiangjin Deng
Xiangjin Deng
ZZZongyu Zhang
Zongyu Zhang
JZJianfeng Zhou
Jianfeng Zhou
CLChunlai Li
Chunlai Li
This work presents the results of the Lunar Regolith Penetrating Radar (LRPR), installed at the bottom of the Chang’E-5 (CE-5) lander, which is the first antenna-array radar deployed for the investigation of an extraterrestrial body. Radar imaging results unveiled a hyperfine structure for the top 2.5-m-thick lunar regolith with an unprecedented high resolution of 5 cm. The interpretation of the results permitted to state that subsurface regolith is dominated by fine grains with abundant rock fragments. The radar imaging results were also used to drive the drilling process until a fragment jammed the core inlet at about 100-cm underground. Laboratory measurements of the samples returned at Earth allow to estimate the real part of relative permittivity and the loss tangent, which are 3.04 ± 0.02 and 0.014 ± 0.002, respectively.