This study aimed to analyze a novel technique to make screws with greater untightening resistance and to solve screw loosening in implant-supported single crowns. Thirty grade IV titanium straight abutments were screwed onto 30 external hex implants using grade IV titanium screws (30 Ncm). They were exposed to cyclic loading (300,000 cycles, 200 N). Samples were divided into 4 groups (15 samples per group): new screws (SCREW group) (control), reused screws (rSCREW group), new screws wrapped with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tape (PTFE group), and reused screws wrapped with PTFE tape (rPTFE group). Reverse torque values (RTVs) were recorded with a digitally calibrated implant motor. Mean RTVs observed were 14.46 N (±1.10 N) for the control group, 14.42 N (±1.22 N) for the rSCREW group, 19.97 N (±1.16 N) for the PTFE group, and 19.13 N (±2.38 N) for the rPTFE group. Statistically significant differences were found between RTVs of both groups employing screws without PTFE tape (SCREW and rSCREW groups) compared with those using screws wrapped with PTFE tape (PTFE and rPTFE) (p < 0.001). These results suggest that wrapping the implant–abutment screw with PTFE tape may effectively lower the risk of loosening and even constitute a solution when this complication occurs in implant single crowns.

Background: Dental implant abutment screw loosening is an increasingly common problem, as evidenced by multiple studies that have investigated its causes. The objective of this study was to compare the screw loosening torque values before and after cyclic loading and to determine whether they are affected by the CAD/CAM abutment manufacturing technique (machined or laser-sintered) and abutment angulation. Materials and Methods: Ninety implants were used and divided into two groups: 45 implants received machined abutments (group A) and 45 implants received laser-sintered abutments (group B). Each group was further divided into three subgroups, with 15 implants each, based on the abutment angulation involved (0°, 15° and 20°). The abutments were tightened to the torque recommended by the manufacturer, and the reverse torque value was measured before and after cyclic loading (300,000 cycles). Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the laser-sintered and machined groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, differences were observed between subgroups with different angulations for both machined (16.2 ± 1.75, 14.7 ± 1.74 and 13.4 ± 1.08 Ncm) and laser-sintered abutments (14.6 ± 1.25, 12.7 ± 1.2 and 11.1 ± 1.35 Ncm) (0°, 15° and 20°, respectively). Conclusions: The final screw loosening torque after cyclic loading was lower than the initial loosening torque. Both abutment angulation and the CAD/CAM manufacturing method exerted a statistically significant influence on the final loosening torque. The abutment angulation factor was estimated to have an influence of 34.5%, while the abutment manufacturing method was estimated to have an influence of 21%.