Paweł Ziółkowski

Mr. Paweł Ziółkowski


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJanusz Badur
Janusz Badur
MLMarcin Lemański
Marcin Lemański
TKTomasz Kowalczyk
Tomasz Kowalczyk
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
SKSebastian Kornet
Sebastian Kornet

1 August 2017 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
TKTomasz Kowalczyk
Tomasz Kowalczyk
SKSebastian Kornet
Sebastian Kornet
JBJanusz Badur
Janusz Badur

1 February 2016 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDariusz Mikielewicz
Dariusz Mikielewicz
JWJan Wajs
Jan Wajs
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
JMJarosław Mikielewicz
Jarosław Mikielewicz

2 October 2021 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
Pawel MadejskiPawel Madejski
Pawel Madejski
MAMilad Amiri
Milad Amiri
TKTomasz Kuś
Tomasz Kuś
KSKamil Sylwester Stasiak
Kamil Sylwester Stasiak
DMDariusz Mikielewicz
Dariusz Mikielewicz
The article presents results of thermodynamic analysis using a zero-dimensional mathematical models of a negative CO2 emission power plant. The developed cycle of a negative CO2 emission power plant allows the production of electricity using gasified sewage sludge as a main fuel. The negative emission can be achieved by the use this type of fuel which is already a “zero-emissive” energy source. Together with carbon capture installation, there is a possibility to decrease CO2 emission below the “zero” level. Developed models of a novel gas cycle which use selected codes allow the prediction of basic parameters of thermodynamic cycles such as output power, efficiency, combustion composition, exhaust temperature, etc. The paper presents results of thermodynamic analysis of two novel cycles, called PDF0 and PFD1, by using different thermodynamic codes. A comparison of results obtained by three different codes offered the chance to verify results because the experimental data are currently not available. The comparison of predictions between three different software in the literature is something new, according to studies made by authors. For gross efficiency (54.74%, 55.18%, and 52.00%), there is a similar relationship for turbine power output (155.9 kW, 157.19 kW, and 148.16 kW). Additionally, the chemical energy rate of the fuel is taken into account, which ultimately results in higher efficiencies for flue gases with increased steam production. A similar trend is assessed for increased CO2 in the flue gas. The developed precise models are particularly important for a carbon capture and storage (CCS) energy system, where relatively new devices mutually cooperate and their thermodynamic parameters affect those devices. Proposed software employs extended a gas–steam turbine cycle to determine the effect of cycle into environment. First of all, it should be stated that there is a slight influence of the software used on the results obtained, but the basic tendencies are the same, which makes it possible to analyze various types of thermodynamic cycles. Secondly, the possibility of a negative CO2 emission power plant and the positive environmental impact of the proposed solution has been demonstrated, which is also a novelty in the area of thermodynamic cycles.

1 December 2015 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJanusz Badur
Janusz Badur
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
DSDaniel Sławiński
Daniel Sławiński
SKSebastian Kornet
Sebastian Kornet

1 July 2019 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PZPaweł Ziółkowski
Paweł Ziółkowski
TKTomasz Kowalczyk
Tomasz Kowalczyk
MLMarcin Lemański
Marcin Lemański
JBJanusz Badur
Janusz Badur