The regional-scale estimation of crop evapotranspiration (ET_c) over a heterogeneous surface is an important tool for the decision-makers in managing and allocating water resources. This is especially critical in the arid to semi-arid regions that require supplemental water due to insufficient precipitation, soil moisture, or groundwater. Over the years, various remote sensing-based surface energy balance (SEB) models have been developed to accurately estimate ET_c over a regional scale. However, it is important to carry out the SEB model assessment for a particular geographical setting to ensure the suitability of a model. Thus, in this study, four commonly used and contrasting remote sensing models viz. METRIC (mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution with internalized calibration), SEBAL (surface energy balance algorithm for land), S-SEBI (simplified surface energy balance index), and SEBS (surface energy balance system) were compared and used to quantify and map the spatio-temporal variation of ET_c in the semi-arid to arid inter-mountain region of Big Horn Basin, Wyoming (Landsat Path/Row: 37/29). Model estimates from 19 cloud-free Landsat 7 and 8 images were compared with the Bowen ratio energy balance system (BREBS) flux stationed in a center pivot irrigated field during 2017 (sugar beet), 2018 (dry bean), and 2019 (barley) growing seasons. The results indicated that all SEB models are effective in capturing the variation of ET_c with R² ranging in between 0.06 to 0.95 and RMSD between 0.07 to 0.15 mm h⁻¹. Pooled data over three vegetative surfaces for three years under irrigated conditions revealed that METRIC (NSE = 0.9) performed better across all land cover types, followed by SEBS (NSE = 0.76), S-SEBI (NSE = 0.73), and SEBAL (NSE = 0.65). In general, all SEB models substantially overestimated ET_c and underestimated sensible heat (H) fluxes under dry conditions when only crop residue was available at the surface. A mid-season density plot and absolute difference maps at image scale between the models showed that models involving METRIC, SEBAL, and S-SEBI are close in their estimates of daily crop evapotranspiration (ET₂₄) with pixel-wise RMSD ranged from 0.54 to 0.76 mm d⁻¹ and an average absolute difference across the study area ranged from 0.47 to 0.56 mm d⁻¹. Likewise, all the SEB models underestimated the seasonal ET_c, except SEBS.

Crop evapotranspiration (ET_c) estimates, on a regional scale, hold enormous potential in managing surface and groundwater resources. This is particularly important for the headwater state of Wyoming, which provides water to found major river basins of the US. In this study, METRIC (Mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution with internalized calibration), a satellite-based image processing model, was used to map and quantify daily, monthly, and seasonal ET_c and other energy balance fluxes, i.e., net radiation (R_n), sensible heat (H), and soil heat flux (G) dynamics for different land-use classes. Monthly and seasonal ETc estimated were further used to approximate regional water consumption patterns for different land-use types for nine irrigation districts in semi-arid to arid intermountain region of Big Horn Basin (BHB), Wyoming. The validation of METRIC retrievals against Bowen ratio energy balance system (BREBS) fluxes measured over three vegetative surfaces, viz. sugar beet in 2017, dry bean in 2018, and barley in 2019, indicated high accuracy. The pooled correlation observed between estimated (pooled) and measured instantaneous fluxes had R² values of 0.91 (RMSE = 0.08 mm h⁻¹, NSE = 0.91), 0.81 (RMSE = 49.6 Wm⁻², NSE = 0.67), 0.53 (RMSE = 27.1 Wm⁻², NSE = 0.53), and 0.86 (RMSE = 59.2 Wm⁻², NSE = 0.84) for ET_c, R_n, G, and H, respectively. The biggest discrepancy between measured and estimated monthly ETc values was observed during times when BREBS flux tower footprint was devoid of any crops or the crops at footprint were not actively transpiring. Validation results improved when comparisons were made on monthly scales with METRIC underestimating growing season ET_c in the range between 3.2% to 6.0%. Seasonal ETc by land-use type showed significant variation over the study area where crop ETc was 52% higher than natural vegetation ETc. Furthermore, it was found that, in the arid to semi-arid intermountain region of Wyoming, the contribution of irrigation to total seasonal ETc varied in the range of 73–81% in nine irrigation districts that fall within the study area. The high relative contribution of irrigation highlights the importance of identifying and quantifying ETc for improved management in irrigation system design and water allocation.

Historical repository of UF/IFAS Extension numbered publications made available on the EDIS website. UF/IFAS Extension is a federal, state, and county partnership dedicated to developing knowledge in agriculture, human and natural resources, and the life sciences and to making that knowledge accessible to sustain and enhance the quality of human life.