Thomas Scharf

Prof. Thomas Scharf

Professor of Social Gerontology, Newcastle University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 May 2012 in Critical Social Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TBTine Buffel
Tine Buffel
CPChristopher Phillipson
Christopher Phillipson
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
Developing environments responsive to the aspirations and needs of older people has become a major concern for social and public policy. This article aims to provide a critical perspective on what has been termed ‘age-friendly cities’ by shifting the focus from questions such as ‘What is an ideal city for older people?’ to the question of ‘How age-friendly are cities?’ This approach, it is argued, might be more suited to deal with the complexities of cities as sites of interlocking and conflicting commercial, social, and political interests. This theme is developed by examining: first, the main factors driving the age-friendly debate; second, constraints and opportunities for older people living in urban environments; third, options for a critical social policy; and, fourth, examples of involving older people in the development of age-friendly environments. The article concludes with a brief summary of current tensions and contradictions in the age-friendly debate.

16 March 2017 in JMIR Human Factors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRichard Harte
Richard Harte
LGLiam Glynn
Liam Glynn
ARAlejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
Alejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
Gearóid ÓLaighinGearóid ÓLaighin
Gearóid ÓLaighin
JMIR Human Factors - a leading peer-reviewed ehealth journal

11 October 2016 in European Journal of Ageing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KWKieran Walsh
Kieran Walsh
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
NKNorah Keating
Norah Keating
As a concept, social exclusion has considerable potential to explain and respond to disadvantage in later life. However, in the context of ageing populations, the construct remains ambiguous. A disjointed evidence-base, spread across disparate disciplines, compounds the challenge of developing a coherent understanding of exclusion in older age. This article addresses this research deficit by presenting the findings of a two-stage scoping review encompassing seven separate reviews of the international literature pertaining to old-age social exclusion. Stage one involved a review of conceptual frameworks on old-age exclusion, identifying conceptual understandings and key domains of later-life exclusion. Stage two involved scoping reviews on each domain (six in all). Stage one identified six conceptual frameworks on old-age exclusion and six common domains across these frameworks: neighbourhood and community; services, amenities and mobility; social relations; material and financial resources; socio-cultural aspects; and civic participation. International literature concentrated on the first four domains, but indicated a general lack of research knowledge and of theoretical development. Drawing on all seven scoping reviews and a knowledge synthesis, the article presents a new definition and conceptual framework relating to old-age exclusion.

21 May 2005 in European Journal of Ageing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
CPChristopher Phillipson
Christopher Phillipson
ASAllison E. Smith
Allison E. Smith

3 December 2012 in Ageing and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TBTine Buffel
Tine Buffel
CPChristopher Phillipson
Christopher Phillipson
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
This article explores conceptual and empirical aspects of the social exclusion/inclusion debate in later life, with a particular focus on issues of place and space in urban settings. Exploratory findings are reported from two empirical studies in Belgium and England, which sought to examine experiences of social exclusion and inclusion among people aged 60 and over living in deprived inner-city neighbourhoods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with an ethnically diverse sample of 102 older people in Belgium and 124 in England. Thematic analysis of interview data identifies four issues in relation to the neighbourhood dimension of social exclusion/inclusion in later life: experiences of community change; feelings of security and safety; the management of urban space; and strategies of control. The results suggest that neighbourhoods have a significant influence on shaping the experience of exclusion and inclusion in later life, with a number of similarities identified across the different study areas. The article concludes by discussing conceptual and policy issues raised by the research.

19 March 2019 in The Gerontologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RSRodrigo Serrat
Rodrigo Serrat
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
FVFeliciano Villar
Feliciano Villar
CGCamila Gómez
Camila Gómez
Background and objectives: This study analyzes critically existing knowledge concerning older people’s civic participation, pinpoints gaps in the literature, and proposes new directions for research. Research design and methods: We conducted a scoping review of literature on older people’s civic participation. To conduct this review, we followed the 5-step framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley (Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005; 8: 19–32), and expanded by Levac and colleagues (Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 69). Results: Research into older people’s civic participation has grown steadily over the past 55 years. However, the increasing number of publications mainly concerns collective forms of social participation, particularly volunteering, with other types of participation being more stable over time. Contextual as well as dynamic aspects of civic participation remain underdeveloped. Diversity of older people is scarcely represented in current research. Discussion and implications: This scoping review identifies 4 critical gaps in the literature that should be at the forefront of future research. These are classified as conceptual, contextual, processual, and diverse aspects of research into older people’s civic participation.