Paul Baker

Dr. Paul Baker


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2017 in JMIR Human Factors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRichard Harte
Richard Harte
LGLiam Glynn
Liam Glynn
ARAlejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
Alejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
TSThomas Scharf
Thomas Scharf
Gearóid ÓLaighinGearóid ÓLaighin
Gearóid ÓLaighin
JMIR Human Factors - a leading peer-reviewed ehealth journal

30 May 2017 in JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RHRichard Harte
Richard Harte
LQLeo Quinlan
Leo Quinlan
LGLiam Glynn
Liam Glynn
ARAlejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
Alejandr Rodríguez-Molinero
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
Gearóid ÓLaighinGearóid ÓLaighin
Gearóid ÓLaighin
Mobile and tablet apps, ubiquitous and pervasive computing, wearable computing and domotics for health.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRichard P. Harte
Richard P. Harte
LGLiam Glynn
Liam Glynn
BBBarry J. Broderick
Barry J. Broderick
ARAlejandro Rodriguez-Molinero
Alejandro Rodriguez-Molinero
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
Gearóid ÓLaighinGearóid ÓLaighin
Gearóid ÓLaighin
Connected health devices are generally designed for unsupervised use, by non-healthcare professionals, facilitating independent control of the individuals own healthcare. Older adults are major users of such devices and are a population significantly increasing in size. This group presents challenges due to the wide spectrum of capabilities and attitudes towards technology. The fit between capabilities of the user and demands of the device can be optimised in a process called Human Centred Design. Here we review examples of some connected health devices chosen by random selection, assess older adult known capabilities and attitudes and finally make analytical recommendations for design approaches and design specifications.

30 September 2008 in Assistive Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
NMNathan W. Moon
Nathan W. Moon
The near universal deployment in the United States of a wide variety of information and communications technologies, both wired and wireless, creates potential barriers to use for several key populations, including the poor, people with disabilities, and the aging. Equal access to wireless technologies and services can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms, including legislation and regulations, market-based solutions, and awareness and outreach-based approaches. This article discusses the results of policy research conducted by the Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Wireless Technologies (Wireless RERC) using policy Delphi polling methodology to probe stakeholders' opinions on key access barrier issues and to explore potential policy responses. Participants included disability advocates, disability/wireless technology policy makers, and product developers/manufacturers. Respondent input informed subsequent development of potential policy initiatives to increase access to these technologies. The findings from the Delphi suggest that awareness issues remain most important, especially manufacturer awareness of user needs and availability of consumer information for selecting the most appropriate wireless devices and services. Other key issues included the ability of people with disabilities to afford technologies and inadequacies in legislation and policy making for ensuring their general accessibility, as well as usefulness in emergencies. Technical issues, including interoperability, speech-to-text conversion, and hearing aid compatibility, were also identified by participating stakeholders as important. To address all these issues, Delphi respondents favored goals and options congruent with voluntary market-driven solutions where possible but also supported federal involvement, where necessary, to aid this process.

1 April 2021 in International Journal of E-Planning Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJohn Bricout
John Bricout
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
NMNathan W. Moon
Nathan W. Moon
BSBonita Sharma
Bonita Sharma
COVID-19 is having an enormous impact on civic life, including public services, governance, and the well-being of citizens. The pace and scope of technology as a force for problem solving, connecting people, sharing information, and organizing civic life has increased in the wake of COVID-19. This article critically reviews how technology use influences the civic engagement potential of the smart city, in particular for people with disabilities. The article aims to articulate new challenges to virtual participation in civic life in terms of accessibility, usability, and equity. Next, the article proposes a framework for a smart participation future involving smarter communities that utilize universal design, blended bottom-up, and virtual community of practice (VCoP) approaches to planning and connecting citizens with disabilities to smart cities. Policy and ethical implications of the proposed smart participation future are considered.

16 April 2018 in American Behavioral Scientist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPaul Baker
Paul Baker
MLMaureen A. Linden
Maureen A. Linden
SLSalimah S. LaForce
Salimah S. LaForce
JRJennifer Rutledge
Jennifer Rutledge
KGKenneth P. Goughnour
Kenneth P. Goughnour
Although progress has been made toward the objective of increased employment for people with disabilities, the 17.2% employment rate of people with disabilities stands in distressing contrast to the 65% rate of those without disabilities. This article summarizes the results of a comparative survey of representative academic literature and industry publications related to employer policies and practices that can affect workforce participation of individuals with disabilities. Emergent themes include variance in employer perspectives on hiring of individuals with disabilities, impact of perceived versus actual cost as a hiring barrier, and the perceived mismatch of education and/or skills to job qualifications among applicants with disabilities. These themes represent key areas to probe in subsequent research. The research objective is to identify focal points in the industry literature, representative of employer and industry (demand side) points of view that differ from those generally portrayed in the academic literature (more generally, supply side). Findings from a thematic analysis of industry publications can provide (1) evidenced based background to assist in crafting targeted policy to address employer awareness, (2) informed development of industry guidance on topics that may assist employers to achieve a more inclusive workplace, and (3) insights applicable to addressing barriers to broadening participation by technical, scientific, and engineering trained individuals with disabilities.