The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of ultrasound treatment and freezing/thawing on the physical properties of blueberries (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Fruits were subjected to ultrasound treatment, mechanical freezing/thawing, and freezing/thawing with subsequent ultrasound treatment. Moisture, density, porosity, hardness, springiness, cohesiveness, chewiness, gumminess, and color of blueberries were analyzed. Ultrasound treatment and freezing/thawing significantly decreased particle density and increased porosity of blueberries (p < 0.05). Ultrasound treatment and freezing/thawing produced significantly softer, less chewy and gummy berries in relation to control sample (p < 0.05). All techniques induced considerable changes in the color of blueberries. The results indicates that ultrasound treatment performed after freezing/thawing, didn’t exert any effect on the fruits in relation to freezing/thawing alone (p > 0.05); however, it is an interesting technique for processing fresh blueberries and an alternative to freezing/thawing, when the preservation of product quality is a priority or when rapid textural damage is required before diffusion processes.

The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young’s modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young’s modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa.