This study presents experimental results from shaking table tests on a reduced‐scale geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall (RSRW) to investigate the seismic response of the fundamental frequency, acceleration amplification, face displacement, backfill surface settlement, and reinforcement strain under different peak accelerations and durations. The fundamental frequency is in good agreement with the predicted values. The root mean square (RMS) acceleration amplification factors increase nonlinearly with the wall height and decrease with increasing seismic load, which is not regarded as a constant value. The distributions of the peak displacement are consistent with those of the residual displacement. The combination of the sliding and rotation is observed as the predominant mode of displacement, and the rotation mode is dominant. The positions near the face (35 cm) and the ends of the reinforcement (140 cm) demonstrated larger settlement than that of the central position (70 cm and 105 cm). The reinforcement strain increased with increasing peak acceleration and maximum values measured at the central layers. The trends of the potential failure surface are similar to those of the 0.3H bilinear failure surface. The friction coefficient is nonlinearly distributed along with the reinforcements, and the maximum friction coefficient appears at the top layer (F11).

Major earthquakes and rainfall may occur at the same time, necessitating further investigation into the dynamic characteristics and responses of reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to the combined forces of rainfall and seismic activity. Three sets of shaking table tests on model retaining walls were designed, a modular reinforced earth retaining wall was utilized as the subject of this study, and a custom-made device was made to simulate rainfall conditions of varying intensities. These tests monitored the rainwater infiltration pattern, macroscopic phenomena, panel displacement, tension behavior, dynamic characteristics, and acceleration response of the modular reinforced earth retaining wall during vibration under different rainfall intensities. The results indicated the following. (1) Rainwater infiltration can be categorized into three stages: rapid rise, rapid decline, and slow decline to stability. The duration for infiltration to reach stability increases with greater rainfall. (2) An increase in rainfall intensity enhances the seismic stability of the retaining wall panel, as higher rainfall intensity results in reduced sand leakage from the panel, thereby diminishing panel deformation during vibration. (3) Increased rainfall intensity decreases the shear strength of the soil, leading to a greater load on the reinforcement. (4) The natural vibration frequencies of the three groups of retaining walls decreased by 0.21%, 0.54%, and 2.326%, respectively, indicating some internal damage within the retaining walls, although the degree of damage was not severe. Additionally, the peak displacement of the panel increased by 0.91 mm, 0.63 mm, and 0.61 mm, respectively. (5) The amplification effect of rainfall on internal soil acceleration is diminished, with this weakening effect becoming more pronounced as rainfall intensity increases. These research findings can provide a valuable reference for multi-disaster risk assessments of modular reinforced soil retaining walls.

A series of shaking table tests was carried out on the dynamic performance and working mechanism of a gabion reinforced soil retaining wall under seismic load. The test results show that the panel presents the deformation mode of middle and upper bulging at the contact point between the rigid box and the retaining wall The settlement of top backfill is relatively uniform, and there is basically no differential settlement, the natural frequencies at different positions and heights inside the retaining wall are basically the same, and the natural frequencies are stable between 22.61 and 23.04 Hz below 0.8 g. The damping ratio decreases with the increase in wall height, and the damping ratio at each stage after vibration is greater than that before vibration. The seismic earth pressure is nonlinearly distributed. The measured value of the lower part of the retaining wall is smaller than that calculated by the Seed–Whitman method with an increase in peak acceleration, and the measured value of the upper part of the retaining wall is larger than the theoretical calculation results. The position of the resultant action point of seismic earth pressure is greater than 0.33 times the wall height specified by the Mononobe–Okabe method.

This paper presents experimental results from shaking table tests on two reduced-scale geogrid reinforced soil-retaining walls (RSRWs) constructed using standard soil, modular facing blocks, and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement to investigate the distribution of the geogrid strain and the mode of potential failure surface for dynamic loading conditions. Similitude relationships for shaking table tests in a 1 g gravitational field were used to scale the specimen geometry, applied characteristics of the earthquake motions. The lateral displacement of the top model is sufficiently large for the top-model block to fall down, and the RSRW is thus destroyed. The tensile strain at the lower part is greater than that at the upper part of the RSRW. The tensile strain in different layers for two-tiered RSRW is consistent with single-step RSRW. On comparing the measured maximum tensile strain lines of the geogrid with the result of the existing calculation method of the potential failure surface, it can be observed that the existing partial calculation method is conservative. Based on the calculation methods of various potential failure surfaces and the measured data, the use of a two-tiered fold-line failure surface is proposed for the two-tiered RSRW while taking into consideration the width of the platform. And it is advised that the failure surface calculation method of BS8006 be used as the calculation method for the potential failure surface of the single-step RSRW under dynamic motion.