The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of crowns fabricated using a polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) dental model. An intraoral scanner (LAVA TDS) was used to scan a prepared molar abutment as a master model. The STL file obtained from the scanning process was transferred into the FDM 3D printer (Value 3D Magix MF-1000) and then models were fabricated with PVA filament. In order to compare with the conventional method, an impression of the master model was taken using silicone impression material to fabricate the conventional stone cast model (Conv). An indirect resin composite (Gradia) and self-cured acrylic resin (Curergrace) were used to fabricate crowns (n = 20) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Surface accuracy of the Conv and PVA models and internal accuracy of the crowns set on the models were measured using two methods; 3D digital analysis and silicon-fitting evaluation. Statistical analysis of the results was done using t-test and Willcoxon signed rank test with Bonferroni correction at 5% significance. Digital analysis showed the Root Mean Square (RMS) value of PVA model surface was higher than that of Conv, while there was no significant difference between the two crown materials. However, the silicon-fitting analysis showed marginal discrepancy of crowns fabricated on PVA model were within 100 µm. 3D printed PVA model can be used for chairside crown fabrication with an acceptable accuracy.

The aims of this study were to investigate the feasibility of using a DLP 3D printer to fabricate a crown using scan data before tooth preparation, and to investigate the effect of additional heat curing on the mechanical properties of the urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based 3D printed crown. A silicone fitting test was used to evaluate the internal adaptation of the crown. For ultimate tensile strength (UTS), the specimens were tested after 24 h storage in water at 37 °C or after 10,000 thermal cycles (TC) between 5–55 °C. For shear bond strength (SBS), a PMMA self-curing resin was filled into a Teflon ring mounted onto the polished UDMA specimens. The internal adaptation of the crowns fabricated with cement space was better than those with no cement space. There was no significant difference in UTS between light-curing and additional heat-curing groups after TC. As for the SBS, there was a significant difference after TC between the two groups. Crowns can be fabricated by a DLP 3D printer using pre-preparation scans with a cement space defined in the software. Additional heat curing of the UDMA-based crown reduced residual monomer and improved its mechanical properties.

To evaluate wear characteristics of materials for additive manufacturing (AM) after a simulated occlusal test in primary teeth. Wear was simulated by means of impacting - sliding wear testing (ISWT) between specimens prepared from materials for AM against enamel derived from deciduous teeth. The prepared hemispherical upper specimens were subjected to impacting-sliding wear test (ISWT) machine against the flattened enamel of deciduous molars on lower specimens. The samples were subjected to 20,000 load cycles using a contact force of 30 N between the opposing surfaces under controlled conditions. In the upper specimens, five groups (n=9): four types of additively manufactured materials Dima, Zenith, Detax, Veltz and a deciduous enamel groups were tested in this study. The enamel-to-enamel group was used as the control. Wear characteristics comprised wear surface area, wear depth, wear volumetric loss, and surface roughness were measured with a confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data obtained were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05). Dima showed significantly higher worn surface area (p = 0.009, 0.001, and < 0.001 for Zenith, Detax, and control enamel, respectively), volumetric loss (p = 0.027, 0.007, and < 0.001 for Zenith, Detax, and control enamel, respectively), and damaged opposing enamel (p = 0.002, 0.001, and 0.01 for Detax, Veltz, and control enamel, respectively). There was no significant difference among the volumetric loss in Zenith and Detax. However, SEM revealed that Zenith showed rough worn surfaces and chipping, Detax showed rather a smooth circular worn surface. The worn area of Veltz was smaller than Detax and Zenith at 5,000 cycles, but higher at 15,000 and 20,000 cycles, and SEM showed detachment. Wear behavior was different among different materials for AM. In the upper specimens, DM and VZ showed large wear. In the lower specimens, DM caused largest enamel wear and damage. In contrast, ZT and DX showed lower wear and caused less damage to the antagonistic primary enamel. SEM image of ZT showed large losses due to chipping, whereas DX showed the rather smooth. DX was confirmed to have lowest wear and caused least damage to the opposing deciduous enamel, which might be applicable as restorative treatments in deciduous dentition. Additive manufactured dental materials could be considered as a treatment modality in deciduous teeth.