Robert Nebeluk

Mr. Robert Nebeluk

Institute of Control and Computation Engineering
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 January 2021 in Algorithms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert Nebeluk
Robert Nebeluk
Maciej LawrynczukMaciej Lawrynczuk
Maciej Lawrynczuk
This work is concerned with the tuning of the parameters of Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithms when used for industrial tasks, i.e., compensation of disturbances that affect the process (process uncontrolled inputs and measurement noises). The discussed simulation optimisation tuning procedure is quite computationally simple since the consecutive parameters are optimised separately, and it requires only a very limited number of simulations. It makes it possible to perform a multicriteria control assessment as a few control quality measures may be taken into account. The effectiveness of the tuning method is demonstrated for a multivariable distillation column. Two cases are considered: a perfect model case and a more practical case in which the model is characterised by some error. It is shown that the discussed tuning approach makes it possible to obtain very good control quality, much better than in the most common case in which all tuning parameters are constant.

16 February 2023 in Nonlinear Dynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert Nebeluk
Robert Nebeluk
KZKrzysztof Zarzycki
Krzysztof Zarzycki
DSDawid Seredyński
Dawid Seredyński
PCPatryk Chaber
Patryk Chaber
MFMaksym Figat
Maksym Figat
Cezary ZielinskiCezary Zielinski
Cezary Zielinski
Moving-object tracking using a pan–tilt camera setup is quite a well-known task in robotics. However, the presented research addresses specific properties of the tracked object and introduces novel features to the pan–tilt camera control strategy. Pan–tilt camera control does not operate in an isolated environment. It is a part of the visual servoing system with specific goals. The system has to fulfill certain purposes, which affect its configuration and functionality. The pan–tilt system aims at keeping the visually tracked object within the middle of the image. At the same time, the overall visual servoing efficiently recognizes and tracks the object enabling its grasping by the robot arm. It uses a predictive strategy utilizing specific second-order linear models for pan and tilt joints. Model predictive control (MPC) introduces into the system the ability to predict camera operation over the specific horizon according to the predefined tracking goals. As the system anticipates future positions over the horizon of operation, the setpoint prediction of the future tracked system positions is required. Visual object recognition and tracking system use particular strategies for preparing online tracked object extrapolation over MPC horizon. Therefore, the pan–tilt camera system is intrinsically coupled to camera-based recognition and tracking. Predictive pan–tilt positioning keeps the tracked system in the middle of the image, while the visual system extrapolation improves the tracking performance. The proposed approach is thoroughly tested in the dedicated Gazebo-based robot simulator. Finally, the system is implemented and validated on the Velma robot. The results and their comparison with other control strategies confirm the initial assumptions, allowing further visual servoing system development.

30 August 2021 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Maciej LawrynczukMaciej Lawrynczuk
Maciej Lawrynczuk
RNRobert Nebeluk
Robert Nebeluk
Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithms typically use the classical L2 cost function, which minimises squared differences of predicted control errors. Such an approach has good numerical properties, but the L1 norm that measures absolute values of the control errors gives better control quality. If a nonlinear model is used for prediction, the L1 norm leads to a difficult, nonlinear, possibly non-differentiable cost function. A computationally efficient alternative is discussed in this work. The solution used consists of two concepts: (a) a neural approximator is used in place of the non-differentiable absolute value function; (b) an advanced trajectory linearisation is performed on-line. As a result, an easy-to-solve quadratic optimisation task is obtained in place of the nonlinear one. Advantages of the presented solution are discussed for a simulated neutralisation benchmark. It is shown that the obtained trajectories are very similar, practically the same, as those possible in the reference scheme with nonlinear optimisation. Furthermore, the L1 norm even gives better performance than the classical L2 one in terms of the classical control performance indicator that measures squared control errors.

28 July 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KZKrzysztof Zarzycki
Krzysztof Zarzycki
PCPatryk Chaber
Patryk Chaber
KCKrzysztof Cabaj
Krzysztof Cabaj
Maciej LawrynczukMaciej Lawrynczuk
Maciej Lawrynczuk
PMPiotr Marek Marusak
Piotr Marek Marusak
AWAndrzej Wojtulewicz
Andrzej Wojtulewicz
This work is concerned with the vulnerability of a network industrial control system to cyber-attacks, which is a critical issue nowadays. This is because an attack on a controlled process can damage or destroy it. These attacks use long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks, which model dynamical processes. This means that the attacker may not know the physical nature of the process; an LSTM network is sufficient to mislead the process operator. Our experimental studies were conducted in an industrial control network containing a magnetic levitation process. The model training, evaluation, and structure selection are described. The chosen LSTM network very well mimicked the considered process. Finally, based on the obtained results, we formulated possible protection methods against the considered types of cyber-attack.

26 January 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RNRobert Nebeluk
Robert Nebeluk
Maciej LawrynczukMaciej Lawrynczuk
Maciej Lawrynczuk
This work is concerned with Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm for vehicle obstacle avoidance. The second objective of the algorithm is on-line minimization of fuel utilization. At first, the rudimentary nonlinear MPC optimization problem is formulated. Next, the constraints related to the predicted process state variables are formulated as soft ones to guarantee computational safety. Furthermore, in order to obtain a computationally simple procedure, the process dynamics and the fuel utilization model are linearized on-line and used for prediction in MPC. It leads to a quadratic programming MPC task, the necessity of nonlinear optimization performed in real-time is eliminated. In order to stress advantages of the discussed computationally uncomplicated MPC method it is compared with the basic scheme with on-line nonlinear optimization in terms of control quality and computational time. Additionally, effectiveness of the MPC algorithm is discussed in presence of modeling errors and measurement noise. Finally, additional constraints imposed on the rate of change of the manipulated variables are considered.

15 July 2022 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRobert Nebeluk
Robert Nebeluk
Maciej LawrynczukMaciej Lawrynczuk
Maciej Lawrynczuk
This work describes the development of a fast Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm for a Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell. The MPC cost-function used considers the sum of absolute values of predicted control errors (the L1 norm). Unlike previous approaches to nonlinear MPC-L1, in which quite complicated neural approximators have been used, two analytical approximators of the absolute value function are utilised. An advanced trajectory linearisation is performed on-line. As a result, an easy-to-solve quadratic optimisation task is derived. All implementation details of the discussed algorithm are detailed for two considered approximators. Furthermore, the algorithm is thoroughly compared with the classical MPC-L2 method in which the sum of squared predicted control errors is minimised. A multi-criteria control quality assessment is performed as the MPC-L1 and MPC-L2 algorithms are compared using four control quality indicators. It is shown that the presented MPC-L1 scheme gives better results for the PEM.