Background: Each year there are more than 800,000 deaths by suicide across the world, while India alone accounts for one third of female suicides and one fourth of male suicides worldwide. Responsible media reporting of suicide is an important suicide prevention intervention at the population level. There is sufficient evidence to show that the way suicide is reported and portrayed in the media can have a significant impact on individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Recognizing the important role of the media in suicide prevention, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines for responsible reporting of suicides by the media. The Press Council of India, in 2019 endorsed WHO’s guidelines for media reporting of suicides, however there is no evidence that the Indian media is complying with these guidelines. Methods: To encourage responsible media reporting, we developed a scorecard to assess and rate media reports on suicide. We reviewed several resource documents that contained guidelines on responsible reporting of suicide. After consulting with a team of experts, we arrived at a scorecard that consisted of 10 positive and 10 negative parameters. Results: We applied the scorecard to 1318 reports on suicide from 9 English language newspapers, with the highest readership in India between the dates of 1 April to 30 June 2020. For the articles analyzed, the average positive score across all newspapers was 1.32 and the average negative score was 3.31. Discussion: The scorecard can be a useful tool to assess media reports on suicide and provide metrics for the same. It can facilitate improved monitoring and engagement with media organizations, who can quickly check their own reporting compliance to the WHO guidelines and compare how well they are performing compared to their peers over time.

Background: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide. Treatment of cataract is surgical. Topical corticosteroids are routinely used in the treatment of post-operative inflammation following cataract surgery. This study aims to compare the intraocular pressure changes caused by topical steroids (dexamethasone and difluprednate) and to detect adverse effects. Methods: All patients operated by phacoemulsification in ophthalmology Department of SMIMER Surat were taken as subjects. Depending on topical steroids prescribed after surgery, subjects were separated into 2 groups, group 1 - difluprednate and group 2 - dexamethasone. Changes in intra-ocular pressure (IOP) of patients were collected from the data available pre-operative, 1st ,2nd ,3rd ,4th week after surgery and were analyzed. Other parameters whose data were collected are-adverse effects and compliance of patients. Results: In group 1 preoperative mean IOP was 15.5. At the end of 1st week, the mean IOP was significantly increased to 15.8. There was equal rise in IOP during 3rd week and 4th week which means that after 3rd week IOP remains stable. In group 2 preoperative mean IOP was 15.4. At the end of 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th there was significant increase in IOP as compared to preoperative mean IOP. Adverse effects were reported more in group 2. Conclusions: In group 1 there was a rise in IOP up to three weeks but after 3rd week IOP remained stable. In group 2 rise in IOP was seen throughout 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse effects seen more in group 2. Compliance of patients was better in group 1.