Background: Each year there are more than 800,000 deaths by suicide across the world, while India alone accounts for one third of female suicides and one fourth of male suicides worldwide. Responsible media reporting of suicide is an important suicide prevention intervention at the population level. There is sufficient evidence to show that the way suicide is reported and portrayed in the media can have a significant impact on individuals experiencing suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Recognizing the important role of the media in suicide prevention, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued guidelines for responsible reporting of suicides by the media. The Press Council of India, in 2019 endorsed WHO’s guidelines for media reporting of suicides, however there is no evidence that the Indian media is complying with these guidelines. Methods: To encourage responsible media reporting, we developed a scorecard to assess and rate media reports on suicide. We reviewed several resource documents that contained guidelines on responsible reporting of suicide. After consulting with a team of experts, we arrived at a scorecard that consisted of 10 positive and 10 negative parameters. Results: We applied the scorecard to 1318 reports on suicide from 9 English language newspapers, with the highest readership in India between the dates of 1 April to 30 June 2020. For the articles analyzed, the average positive score across all newspapers was 1.32 and the average negative score was 3.31. Discussion: The scorecard can be a useful tool to assess media reports on suicide and provide metrics for the same. It can facilitate improved monitoring and engagement with media organizations, who can quickly check their own reporting compliance to the WHO guidelines and compare how well they are performing compared to their peers over time.

Introduction: Health insurance coverage can serve as protection against catastrophic health expenditures. Section 21 (4) of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA) mandates insurance coverage for mental illness to be on par with that for physical illness. Despite this, anecdotal evidence shows persons with mental health conditions are routinely denied or face difficulties in obtaining medical insurance coverage due to their mental illness. Method: We undertook an analysis of all insurance policy documents published on the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) webpage for the year 2020-21 to examine their relevance to mental illness and to examine how the policy wording adheres to Section 21 (4) of the MHCA and the core principles of bioethics. Results: We sourced 459 health insurance policies for the year 2020-21 from the IRDAI webpage. Of these, 268 relevant insurance policies were analysed in depth for their adherence to the MHCA guidelines and principles of bioethics. Of the policies analysed (n=268), we found six policies (from two insurance providers) explicitly excluded mental illness across all domains, in direct contradiction of the MHCA and the subsequent guidance issued by the IRDAI. Most insurance policies excluded coverage for injuries due to attempted suicide or self-injury (n=224) or alcohol consumption/substance use (n=267). Out-patient services were included in 23 policies.>/p> Discussion: Health insurance policies continue to contain discriminatory terms for mental illness thus violating the principle of parity put forth by the MHCA and at odds with core principles of bioethics. Sustained advocacy efforts are required to ensure insurance providers abide by the principles of parity in letter and in spirit to remove differential or discriminatory terms for mental illness in their policies in compliance with Section 21 (4) the MHCA.