A life cycle framework for a new integrated classification system for buildings and the identification of renovation strategies that lead to an optimal balance between reduction of seismic vulnerability and increase of energy efficiency, considering both economic losses and environmental impacts, is discussed through a parametric application to an exemplificative case-study building. Such framework accounts for the economic and environmental contributions of initial construction, operational energy consumption, earthquake-induced damage repair activities, retrofitting interventions, and demolition. One-off and annual monetary expenses and environmental impacts through the building life cycle are suggested as meaningful performance metrics to develop an integrated classification system for buildings and to identify the optimal renovation strategy leading to a combined reduction of economic and environmental impacts, depending on the climatic conditions and the seismic hazard at the site of interest. The illustrative application of the framework to an existing school building is then carried out, investigating alternative retrofitting solutions, including either sole structural retrofitting options or sole energy refurbishments, as well as integrated strategies that target both objectives, with a view to demonstrate its practicality and to explore its ensuing results. The influence of seismic hazard and climatic conditions is quantitatively investigated, by assuming the building to be located into different geographic locations.

It is well-known that the existing building stock is responsible for non-renewable resource depletion, energy and material consumption, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Life cycle analysis (LCA) procedures have thus been developed, in recent years, to assess the environmental impact of construction and operational phases through the entire building life cycle. Furthermore, the economic, environmental, and social consequences of recent natural disasters have encouraged the additional integration of hazard-induced impacts into common LCA procedures for buildings. Buildings are however expected to provide the population with safe living and working conditions, even when hit by different types of hazards during their service life, such as earthquakes. Hence, next-generation LCA procedures should include not only hazard-induced impacts, but also the contribution of potential retrofitting strategies that may alter the structural and energy performances of buildings throughout their remaining service life. This study presents a life cycle framework that accounts for the contributions of initial construction, operational energy consumption, earthquake-induced damage repair activities, potential retrofitting interventions, and demolition (considering also its associated potential material recycling), in terms of both monetary costs and environmental impacts. The proposed methodology can be used to undertake cost-benefit analyses aimed at identifying building renovation strategies that lead to an optimal balance, considering both economic and environmental impacts, between reduction of seismic vulnerability and increase of energy efficiency of a building, depending on the climatic conditions and the seismic hazard at the site of interest.

Starting from considerations on the high seismic vulnerability of nonstructural elements, and at the same time the scarce consideration of their performance at the different stages of the design and assessment process, this paper proposes a very simple and ready-to-use seismic classification scheme for nonstructural elements. The proposed approach is based on a limited set of information, which may take advantage of the availability of a numerical model of the building and its results, although it may also rely on code formulations and evaluations of seismic performance from the literature. The different seismic classes are assigned to nonstructural elements by quantifying their expected seismic performance by means of fragility curves. This classification may be applied to newly designed nonstructural elements to help identify the best typology for the site and building of interest, and also for existing nonstructural elements that are already installed in existing buildings. In the latter case, the classification may help in defining a prioritization scheme for interventions required to make nonstructural elements safer for the building of concern. The feasibility of the proposed procedure is demonstrated by its application to two case studies, referring to existing buildings located at different seismicity sites.

This paper presents a global performance-based seismic assessment of an existing reinforced concrete hospital building retrofitted with dissipative bracing systems. The study aims to evaluate the overall effectiveness of different dissipative configurations, two traditional systems and one innovative low-activation solution in enhancing the seismic performance of the structure in compliance with the Italian Building Code (NTC 2018). The analyses were carried out using nonlinear static (pushover) procedures to determine the global capacity, equivalent damping, and displacement demand at the Life Safety (SLV) and Near Collapse (SLC) limit states. The retrofitting interventions were modeled assuming elastic connections between the existing RC frames and the added steel members, consistent with standard design practice in which connections are dimensioned with overstrength to avoid premature failure. The results demonstrate that the integration of dissipative systems significantly increases stiffness and damping, effectively reducing lateral displacements and improving the seismic safety index above the 60% threshold required for strategic facilities. The study highlights the importance of global assessment methodologies in guiding the seismic upgrading of hospitals and other critical infrastructures, while local detailing and device-level optimization are identified as topics for future research.

The seismic retrofit of existing reinforced concrete (RC) buildings equipped with dissipative bracing systems requires not only a global performance-based assessment, but also a rigorous verification of the local behavior of critical structural connections. In this context, the present study focuses on the numerical seismic performance of a beam–column connection extracted from a retrofitted RC hospital building located in Italy. The investigated joint represents a central node where two orthogonal steel bracing systems converge and transfer seismic forces to an RC column strengthened with heavy steel jacketing and anchorage devices. A detailed three-dimensional finite element model of the connection is developed using solid elements for concrete and steel components, explicit modeling of reinforcement bars, bolts, and anchor rods, and advanced nonlinear constitutive laws for both materials. Two modeling strategies are considered, including the explicit simulation of contact interfaces between steel components, in order to capture local stress redistribution and potential interaction effects. The connection is subject to seismic demand derived from the global structural analysis, corresponding to different values of the behavior factor, thus ensuring consistency between global design assumptions and local verification. The results highlight the progressive activation of nonlinear mechanisms within the steel components, the development of cracking and compression damage in the concrete core, and the preservation of a clear hierarchy of resistances under design-level seismic actions. The numerical outcomes allow a critical discussion on the role of local connection behavior in supporting the global dissipative strategy and provide quantitative insights into the evaluation of the behavior factor from a local-response perspective. The study emphasizes the importance of detailed connection-level analyses in the seismic retrofit of strategic facilities and supports a more consistent integration between global performance objectives and local structural design.