Massimiliano Scopelliti

Prof. Massimiliano Scopelliti

Department of Human Studies, LUMSA University, and Centre for Interuniversity Research on Environmental Psychology (CIRPA), Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2015 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGiuseppe Carrus
Giuseppe Carrus
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
Raffaele LafortezzaRaffaele Lafortezza
Raffaele Lafortezza
GCGiuseppe Colangelo
Giuseppe Colangelo
FFFrancesco Ferrini
Francesco Ferrini
Giovanni SanesiGiovanni Sanesi
Giovanni Sanesi

1 December 2004 in Journal of Environmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
MGM. Vittoria Giuliani
M. Vittoria Giuliani

19 July 2005 in Universal Access in the Information Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
MGMaria Vittoria Giuliani
Maria Vittoria Giuliani
ferdinando fornaraferdinando fornara
ferdinando fornara

1 April 2016 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
GCG. Carrus
G. Carrus
CAC. Adinolfi
C. Adinolfi
GSG. Suarez
G. Suarez
GCG. Colangelo
G. Colangelo
Giovanni SanesiGiovanni Sanesi
Giovanni Sanesi

1 October 2013 in PsyEcology: Bilingual Journal of Environmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGiuseppe Carrus
Giuseppe Carrus
Raffaele LafortezzaRaffaele Lafortezza
Raffaele Lafortezza
GCGiuseppe Colangelo
Giuseppe Colangelo
IDIvana Dentamaro
Ivana Dentamaro
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
Giovanni SanesiGiovanni Sanesi
Giovanni Sanesi
Green spaces have positive effects on human well-being and quality of life in cities. So far, studies in this field mainly compared preferences for, and outcomes of contact with, natural vs. built environments. Less attention has been given to the study of the psychological effects of contact with green spaces differing in their degree of naturalness. This paper thus aims at understanding the relation between ecological (e.g., level of naturalness) and psychological factors (e.g., perceived restorativeness) in shaping evaluations of different urban and peri-urban green spaces. Five typologies of green space have been identified in the city of Bari (southern Italy), ranging from minimum (i.e., high level of man-made elements) to maximum levels of naturalness (i.e., low level of man-made elements). A set of pictures of the different urban green space typologies was shown to fifty undergraduate students of the University of Bari, and then measures of perceived restorativeness were taken. Results show that perceived restorativeness is the highest in peri-urban green spaces, and increases significantly as a function of the level of naturalness.

28 January 2019 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Massimiliano ScopellitiMassimiliano Scopelliti
Massimiliano Scopelliti
GCGiuseppe Carrus
Giuseppe Carrus
Marino BonaiutoMarino Bonaiuto
Marino Bonaiuto
Research on restorative environments has showed the healthy outcomes of nature experience, though often by comparing attractive natural to unattractive built environments. Some studies indeed showed the restorative value of artistic/historical settings. In a quasi-experimental study involving 125 participants in Rome, Italy, a natural and a built/historical environment, both scoring high in restorative properties, were evaluated in a natural, built/historical, or neutral setting. In accordance with the Biophilia hypothesis and the Attention Restoration Theory (ART), we hypothesized: a higher restorative potential of nature also when compared to built/historical environments; a moderation effect of on-site experience on perceived restorative potential (PRP) of both environmental typologies; higher levels of restorative properties of the environment for on-site vs. not on-site respondents; and a mediation effect of the restorative properties of the environment in the relationship between time spent on-site and PRP. Results supported the hypotheses. In addition, different psychological processes leading to restoration emerged for the natural and the built/historical environment. Theoretical implications for ART and practical applications for an integrative urban design with natural and historical elements are discussed.