Daniela Gurlin

Dr. Daniela Gurlin

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSundarabalan V. Balasubramanian
Sundarabalan V. Balasubramanian
NPNima Pahlevan
Nima Pahlevan
BSBrandon Smith
Brandon Smith
CBCaren Binding
Caren Binding
JSJohn Schalles
John Schalles
EBEmmanuel Boss
Emmanuel Boss

16 February 2023 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMoritz Lehmann
Moritz Lehmann
DGDaniela Gurlin
Daniela Gurlin
NPNima Pahlevan
Nima Pahlevan
KAKrista Alikas
Krista Alikas
TCTed Conroy
Ted Conroy
LYLinwei Yue
Linwei Yue
The development of algorithms for remote sensing of water quality (RSWQ) requires a large amount of in situ data to account for the bio-geo-optical diversity of inland and coastal waters. The GLObal Reflectance community dataset for Imaging and optical sensing of Aquatic environments (GLORIA) includes 7,572 curated hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance measurements at 1 nm intervals within the 350 to 900 nm wavelength range. In addition, at least one co-located water quality measurement of chlorophyll a, total suspended solids, absorption by dissolved substances, and Secchi depth, is provided. The data were contributed by researchers affiliated with 59 institutions worldwide and come from 450 different water bodies, making GLORIA the de-facto state of knowledge of in situ coastal and inland aquatic optical diversity. Each measurement is documented with comprehensive methodological details, allowing users to evaluate fitness-for-purpose, and providing a reference for practitioners planning similar measurements. We provide open and free access to this dataset with the goal of enabling scientific and technological advancement towards operational regional and global RSWQ monitoring.

28 September 2023 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DJDalin Jiang
Dalin Jiang
BMBunkei Matsushita
Bunkei Matsushita
NPNima Pahlevan
Nima Pahlevan
DGDaniela Gurlin
Daniela Gurlin
CFCédric Fichot
Cédric Fichot
ESEvangelos Spyrakos
Evangelos Spyrakos

14 October 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KZKiana Zolfaghari
Kiana Zolfaghari
NPNima Pahlevan
Nima Pahlevan
CBCaren Binding
Caren Binding
DGDaniela Gurlin
Daniela Gurlin
SSStefan Simis
Stefan Simis
Claude DuguayClaude Duguay
Claude Duguay
Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms are an increasing threat to coastal and inland waters. These blooms can be detected using optical radiometers due to the presence of phycocyanin (PC) pigments. The spectral resolution of best-available multispectral sensors limits their ability to diagnostically detect PC in the presence of other photosynthetic pigments. To assess the role of spectral resolution in the determination of PC, a large ( $N =905$ ) database of colocated in situ radiometric spectra and PC are employed. We first examine the performance of selected widely used machine-learning (ML) models against that of benchmark algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance ( $R_{\mathrm {rs}}$ ) spectra resampled to the spectral configuration of the Hyperspectral Imager for the Coastal Ocean (HICO) with a full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of < 6 nm. Results show that the multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural network applied to HICO spectral configurations (median errors < 65%) outperforms other ML models. This model is subsequently applied to $R_{\mathrm {rs}}$ spectra resampled to the band configuration of existing satellite instruments and of the one proposed for the next Landsat sensor. These results confirm that employing MLP models to estimate PC from hyperspectral data delivers tangible improvements compared with retrievals from multispectral data and benchmark algorithms (with median errors between $\sim 73$ % and 126%) and shows promise for developing a globally applicable cyanobacteria measurement approach.

2 June 2025 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MWMortimer Werther
Mortimer Werther
OBOlivier Burggraaff
Olivier Burggraaff
DGDaniela Gurlin
Daniela Gurlin
ASArun M. Saranathan
Arun M. Saranathan
SBSundarabalan V. Balasubramanian
Sundarabalan V. Balasubramanian
DODaniel Odermatt
Daniel Odermatt

12 December 2025 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DADulcinea Avouris
Dulcinea Avouris
FMFernanda Maciel
Fernanda Maciel
SSSamantha Leigh Sharp
Samantha Leigh Sharp
SCSusanne Elizabeth Craig
Susanne Elizabeth Craig
ADArnold Graham Dekker
Arnold Graham Dekker
JWJeremy Werdell
Jeremy Werdell
The use of satellite-based remote sensing imagery for water quality monitoring of inland and coastal waters has become widespread over the last few decades, with the expansion of, and investment in, operational Earth-observing missions. Satellite-based sensors are uniquely suited to provide synoptic, system-wide water quality parameter estimates that supplement traditional field-based sampling methods. The remote sensing of water quality parameter estimates is particularly valuable in systems with high temporal and spatial variability, as well as in areas that are difficult to access, or where agencies lack funding for routine monitoring. However, optically complex inland and coastal waters pose additional challenges for developing robust remote sensing retrieval models for optical properties and water quality parameters. One of the biggest challenges is collecting high quality field measurements that are used to calibrate and validate the retrieval algorithms. Here, we present the current status of satellite missions, field methods that include instruments used and commonly measured parameters, and repositories of historical field data that are relevant to inland and coastal water studies. We then present data requirements for model validation and highlight gaps in validation coverage. Finally, we provide considerations for future field campaigns to improve coordination with remote sensing data collection and ensure that field data is well suited for use in model or algorithm development.