Lorenzo Tarsitani

Dr. Lorenzo Tarsitani

Sapienza University of Rome
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Gabriele d'EttorreGabriele d'Ettorre
Gabriele d'Ettorre
Giancarlo CeccarelliGiancarlo Ceccarelli
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
Letizia SantinelliLetizia Santinelli
Letizia Santinelli
PVPaolo Vassalini
Paolo Vassalini
GIGiuseppe Pietro Innocenti
Giuseppe Pietro Innocenti
Lorenzo TarsitaniLorenzo Tarsitani
Lorenzo Tarsitani
Prevention of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in healthcare workers (HCWs) facing the current COVID-19 pandemic is a challenge worldwide as HCWs are likely to experience acute and chronic, often unpredictable, occupational stressors leading to PTSS. This review aims to analyze the literature to discover which topics have been focused on and what the latest developments are in managing the occupational risk of PTSS in HCWs during the current pandemic. For the purpose of this review, we searched for publications in MEDLINE/Pubmed using selected keywords. The articles were reviewed and categorized into one or more of the following categories based on their subject matter: risk assessment, risk management, occurrence rates. A total of 16 publications matched our inclusion criteria. The topics discussed were: “Risk Assessment”, “Occurrence Rates”, and “Risk Management”. Young age, low work experience, female gender, heavy workload, working in unsafe settings, and lack of training and social support were found to be predictors of PTSS. This review’s findings showed the need for urgent interventions aimed at protecting HCWs from the psychological impact of traumatic events related to the pandemic and leading to PTSS; healthcare policies need to consider preventive and management strategies toward PTSS, and the related psychic sequelae, in HCWs.

29 March 2021 in Journal of General Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Lorenzo TarsitaniLorenzo Tarsitani
Lorenzo Tarsitani
PVPaolo Vassalini
Paolo Vassalini
AKAlexia Koukopoulos
Alexia Koukopoulos
CBCristian Borrazzo
Cristian Borrazzo
FAFederica Alessi
Federica Alessi
GDGabriella D’eTtorre
Gabriella D’eTtorre

18 February 2019 in Cardiology Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSeverino Paolo
Severino Paolo
MMMarco Valerio Mariani
Marco Valerio Mariani
AMAnnalisa Maraone
Annalisa Maraone
APAgostino Piro
Agostino Piro
ACAndrea Ceccacci
Andrea Ceccacci
FFFrancesco Fedele
Francesco Fedele
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most widely recognized arrhythmia. Systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes, obesity, heart failure, and valvular heart diseases are major risk factors for the onset and progression of AF. Various studies have emphasized the augmented anxiety rate among AF patients due to the poor quality of life; however, little information is known about the possibility of triggering atrial fibrillation by anxiety. The present review sought to underline the possible pathophysiological association between AF and anxiety disorders and suggests that anxiety can be an independent risk factor for AF, acting as a trigger, creating an arrhythmogenic substrate, and modulating the autonomic nervous system. The awareness of the role of anxiety disorders as a risk factor for AF may lead to the development of new clinical strategies for the management of AF.

23 December 2019 in International Journal of Eating Disorders
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RSRiccardo Serra
Riccardo Serra
GKGlenn Kiekens
Glenn Kiekens
JVJohan Vanderlinden
Johan Vanderlinden
EVElske Vrieze
Elske Vrieze
RARandy P Auerbach
Randy P Auerbach
RBRonny Bruffaerts
Ronny Bruffaerts

14 May 2019 in BMJ Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMarianna Purgato
Marianna Purgato
KCKenneth Carswell
Kenneth Carswell
CACeren Acarturk
Ceren Acarturk
TATeresa Au
Teresa Au
SASena Akbai
Sena Akbai
MOMark Van Ommeren
Mark Van Ommeren
Introduction This article describes two randomised controlled trials that will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+), a group self-help intervention developed by the WHO to reduce distress. In these trials SH+ is being tested as a preventative intervention to lower the incidence of mental disorders in asylum seekers and refugees with psychological distress resettled in Europe and Turkey. Methods and analysis Two prospective, multicentre, randomised, rater-blinded, parallel-group studies will follow participants over a period of 12 months. One trial will be conducted in Europe and one in Turkey. In each trial, 600 asylum seekers and refugees screening positive on the General Health Questionnaire (≥3), but without a formal diagnosis of any mental disorders according to the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, will be randomly allocated to SH+or to enhanced treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome will be a lower incidence of mental disorders at 6 month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include the evaluation of psychological symptoms, functioning, well-being, treatment acceptability and indicators of intervention cost-effectiveness. Ethics and dissemination The two trials received ethical clearance from the local Ethics Committees of the participating sites (seven sites), as well as from the WHO Ethics Committee. All participants will provide informed consent before screening and before study inclusion (a two-step procedure). The results of the trials will be disseminated in agreement with a dissemination plan that includes publication(s) in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant national and international conferences and meetings. Trials registration numbers NCT03571347, NCT03587896.

22 October 2021 in Journal of Medical Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gabriele d'EttorreGabriele d'Ettorre
Gabriele d'Ettorre
ECElio Gentilini Cacciola
Elio Gentilini Cacciola
Letizia SantinelliLetizia Santinelli
Letizia Santinelli
GGGabriella De Girolamo
Gabriella De Girolamo
OSOrnella Spagnolello
Ornella Spagnolello
Giancarlo CeccarelliGiancarlo Ceccarelli
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
Despite the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic not yet being under control, post‐Covid‐19 syndrome is already a challenging topic: long‐term multiorgan sequelae, although increasingly described, have not yet been systematized. As post‐Covid‐19 syndrome can significantly impact both the working capacity and the relationship life of surviving patients, we performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last year and currently available in medical literature search databases (MEDLINE/Pubmed) and searching clinical trial registries, to evaluate the available evidence among workers. From 31 publications that initially matched inclusion criteria, 13 studies have been considered suitable for relevance and age of subjects. A wide range of patients (16%–87%) have post‐Covid syndrome; pneumological and neuropsychological symptoms were the most common disorders reported. The most frequent organic sequel found in post‐Covid patients was pulmonary fibrosis. The number of symptoms during acute SARS‐CoV‐2 infection, severity of the disease, and high serum levels of d‐dimer were related to high risk of post‐Covid syndrome. In conclusion, post‐Covid‐19 syndrome can significantly impact the health conditions of surviving patients. Rehabilitation and follow‐up in multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs should be considered for working‐age patients.