Aflatoxins (AF) are carcinogenic metabolites produced by different species of Aspergillus which readily colonize crops. AFM1 is secreted in the milk of lactating mammals through the ingestion of feedstuffs contaminated by aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). Therefore, its presence in milk, even in small amounts, presents a real concern for dairy industries and consumers of dairy products. Different strategies can lead to the reduction of AFM1 contamination levels in milk. They include adopting good agricultural practices, decreasing the AFB1 contamination of animal feeds, or using diverse types of adsorbent materials. One of the most effective types of adsorbents used for AFM1 decontamination are those of microbial origin. This review discusses current issues about AFM1 decontamination methods. These methods are based on the use of different bio-adsorbent agents such as bacteria and yeasts to complex AFM1 in milk. Moreover, this review answers some of the raised concerns about the binding stability of the formed AFM1-microbial complex. Thus, the efficiency of the decontamination methods was addressed, and plausible experimental variants were discussed.

Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) is a salient metabolite that can be used to assess Aflatoxin B₁ (AFB1) exposure in humans and animals. The carcinogenic potency of AFB1 and AFM1 was severely reported. The aims of this study were (1) to survey the contamination level of AFM1 in the most traded infant powdered formula brands (IPF) (n = 42) along with the AFB1 level in under 5’s children food brands (biscuits, cornflakes, and cereals) (n = 42) and (2) to assess the estimated daily intake (EDI), the hazard quotient (HQ) and the margin of exposure (MOE) of AFM1 among infants (0–12 months) in Lebanon. All of the samples were analyzed using ELISA technique. AFB1 was below detection limit in all of the children’s food brands samples. Out of 42 IPF samples 9.5% were AFM1-positive in the range of 29.54–140.16 ng/L and exceeded the maximum tolerable limit (MTL) set by the European commission (25 ng/kg). The overall average contamination level was 5.72 ± 0.014 ng/L. The EDI of AMF1 for male was in the range of 0.37–0.78 ng/kg/b.w./day and 0.40–0.87 ng/kg/b.w./day for females. Similarly, the HQ calculation resulted in an average of 3.05 for males and 3.28 for females. MOE calculations were far lower from 10,000 in both genders which indicates a high risk of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Our findings show that AFM1’s EDI, HQ and MOE scored high among Lebanese infants. As infants consume more IPF relative to their body weight, the persistence of IPF with high AFM1 levels threatens their health. Thus, infant’s exposure risk to AFM1 in IPF should be a continuous focus of attention.

Formation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG biofilm on three different abiotic supports (glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene) over a five-day incubation period was investigated. The changes in expression of the regulatory genes were assessed at 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h. These genes, including MaAb, LuxS, and the extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) gene cluster, are involved in biofilm formation and adhesion. The biofilm quantification tests involved crystal violet staining of biofilms exposed to different combinations of two treatments: biofilm pipetting and heat fixation. The supports were classified based on the strength of adhesion of L. rhamnosus GG biofilm. We found that the strongest adhesion was on stainless steel, then glass, and the weakest was on polystyrene. Days four, two, and three showed the highest biofilm formation on glass, stainless steel, and polystyrene, respectively. Regarding the molecular aspect, we considered only two supports: stainless steel and polystyrene. MaAb, which was identified as a putative modulator, showed a high expression at the first 8 h of biofilm formation on polystyrene and low expression on stainless steel. In vitro expression of the EPS cluster genes showed an upregulation in the expression of most of the genes in the cluster over the first 6 to 8 h on both tested supports. Moreover, the LuxS gene, which is associated with the regulation of biofilm formation, was upregulated at 24 and 48 h on polystyrene and stainless steel supports, respectively. This revealed different expression levels of biofilm-related genes at different times of biofilm formation and on different supports.

The number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases significantly increased with the emergence of multiple variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This has led to an ongoing effort focused on developing the diagnostic detection tests. Among the currently available tests, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) has been considered as the ‘golden method’ for the detection of SARS-COV-2. However, a significant number of inaccurate (false-negative/false-positive) results have been reported in spite of this method's reliability and effectiveness. These unreliable results may arise because of various issues encountered throughout the entire testing process starting with the sampling phase, going through the PCR process, and ending with the result analysis. This article aims to shed light on the errors that occur during the COVID-19 testing process and suggest ways to overcome them effectively. Accurate testing could be optimized by following the correct swabbing technique, using adequate RT-PCR kits and controls, setting clear lab guidelines, and properly interpreting the results.