Fusheng Liang

Dr. Fusheng Liang

School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, University College Dublin

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2020 in Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang
CKChengwei Kang
Chengwei Kang
FFFengzhou Fang
Fengzhou Fang

16 October 2018 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYang Li
Yang Li
JZJi Zhao
Ji Zhao
SJShijun Ji
Shijun Ji
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang

1 July 2021 in Journal of Manufacturing Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dongxu WuDongxu Wu
Dongxu Wu
CKChengwei Kang
Chengwei Kang
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang
GYGuangpeng Yan
Guangpeng Yan
FFFengzhou Fang
Fengzhou Fang

8 February 2021 in Micromachines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dongxu WuDongxu Wu
Dongxu Wu
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang
CKChengwei Kang
Chengwei Kang
FFFengzhou Fang
Fengzhou Fang
Optical interferometry plays an important role in the topographical surface measurement and characterization in precision/ultra-precision manufacturing. An appropriate surface reconstruction algorithm is essential in obtaining accurate topography information from the digitized interferograms. However, the performance of a surface reconstruction algorithm in interferometric measurements is influenced by environmental disturbances and system noise. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three algorithms commonly used for coherence envelope detection in vertical scanning interferometry, including the centroid method, fast Fourier transform (FFT), and Hilbert transform (HT). Numerical analysis and experimental studies were carried out to evaluate the performance of different envelope detection algorithms in terms of measurement accuracy, speed, and noise resistance. Step height standards were measured using a developed interferometer and the step profiles were reconstructed by different algorithms. The results show that the centroid method has a higher measurement speed than the FFT and HT methods, but it can only provide acceptable measurement accuracy at a low noise level. The FFT and HT methods outperform the centroid method in terms of noise immunity and measurement accuracy. Even if the FFT and HT methods provide similar measurement accuracy, the HT method has a superior measurement speed compared to the FFT method.

19 March 2025 in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JZJun Zhao
Jun Zhao
XQXianwei Qiu
Xianwei Qiu
WWWenbing Wang
Wenbing Wang
SBShuming Bi
Shuming Bi
YLYuchen Luo
Yuchen Luo
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang

9 June 2022 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYang Li
Yang Li
FLFusheng Liang
Fusheng Liang