Bálint Trimmel

Dr. Bálint Trimmel

Semmelweis University, Department of Oral Diagnostics
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 November 2020 in Clinical Oral Implants Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBálint Trimmel
Bálint Trimmel
NGNoémi Gede
Noémi Gede
Peter HegyiPeter Hegyi
Peter Hegyi
ZSZsolt Szakács
Zsolt Szakács
Gyöngyi Anna MezeyGyöngyi Anna Mezey
Gyöngyi Anna Mezey
GSGyörgy Szabó
György Szabó
Objectives: To assess the histomorphometric outcomes obtained in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with different biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA).Materials and Methods: A search of the existing medical literature until October 1, 2019, was performed. Inclusion criteria were (a) RCTs assessing a two‐stage MSA from the lateral approach using autologous bone or biomaterials for grafting and (b) reported histomorphometric outcomes based on crestal bone core biopsy samples. The Bayesian method was used to perform pairwise meta‐analyses and network meta‐analysis (NMA). The primary outcome, the new bone percentage (NB %), was calculated as mean differences with 95% credible intervals. The interventions were ranked by their posterior probability by calculating the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values.Results: Thirty‐four RCTs (842 MSAs) were included in the analysis with a normal healing period (5–8 months). All comparisons were presented in a league table. On the basis of the ranking probability, the most effective bone grafting material for NB% was bovine xenograft + bone marrow concentrate (BMC) (81%), followed by bovine xenograft + platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) (77%), bioactive glass ceramic + autologous bone 1:1 (70%), nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in silica gel (70%), and bioactive glass ceramic (70%). Autologous bone graft alone took the twelfth position with 57%.Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present NMA, the analysis did not confirm autologous bone alone as the gold standard for MSA and showed superiority of composite grafts such as bovine xenograft + BMC after 5–8 months of healing.

21 January 2020 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMárton Kivovics
Márton Kivovics
BSBence Tamás Szabó
Bence Tamás Szabó
ONOrsolya Németh
Orsolya Németh
DIDóra Iványi
Dóra Iványi
BTBálint Trimmel
Bálint Trimmel
Csaba Dobo-NagyCsaba Dobo-Nagy
Csaba Dobo-Nagy
The purpose of our study was to compare micromorphometric data obtained by cone-beam computed-tomography (CBCT) and microcomputed-tomography (micro-CT) of the augmented sinus and to evaluate the long-term stability of the bone gain achieved using BoneAlbumin. Sinus lifts, and after 6-months, healing bone-biopsy and implant placement were carried out. Specimens were analyzed by micro-CT. A total of 16 samples were collected from nine patients (mean age 54.7 ± 6.5 years). Pre-, postoperative, and 3-year control CBCT-data were registered to determine from where the biopsy samples were harvested. Micromorphometric variables were calculated from the micro-CT- and CBCT-data, and their correlation was determined by Spearman’s test. The volume of augmented bone was calculated at the time of implant placement and after 3 years. A positive correlation was found between bone-volume fraction, trabecular-separation, open-, and total-porosity, while a negative correlation was found between trabecular-thickness obtained from CBCT- and micro-CT-data (p < 0.05). Mean volumetric reduction of 39.28% (11.88–60.02%) was observed. Correlation of CBCT- and micro-CT-data suggested that micromorphometric analysis of CBCT reconstructions of the augmented sinuses provided reliable information on the microarchitecture of augmented bone. CBCT as a modality might be adequate in the analysis of bone quality in the augmented sinus. At the 3-year, control sinus grafts showed volumetric stability.

6 April 2021 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBálint Trimmel
Bálint Trimmel
SGSzabolcs Gyulai-Gaál
Szabolcs Gyulai-Gaál
MKMárton Kivovics
Márton Kivovics
NJNoémi Piroska Jákob
Noémi Piroska Jákob
Csaba HegedusCsaba Hegedus
Csaba Hegedus
GSGyörgy Szabó
György Szabó
The aim of this study was to compare the microarchitecture of augmented bone following maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) after healing periods of 3 (test) and 6 (control) months using the combination of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and a serum albumin-coated bone allograft (SACBA). Twenty-six patients with 30 surgical sites who required two-stage MSA were enrolled and grafted with the combination of A-PRF and SACBAs. The surgical sites were randomly allocated to the test or control group. During implant site preparation, 17 bone core biopsy samples were collected from each study group for histological, histomorphometric and micromorphometric analysis. Resonance frequency analysis was performed at the time of implant placement and 6, 8, 10, and 12 weeks postoperatively. The percentage of newly formed bone was 44.89 ± 9.49% in the test group and 39.75 ± 8.15% in the control group (p = 0.100). The results of the µCT analysis showed no significant differences in morphometric parameters between the study groups. The implant stability quotient was not significantly different between the two groups at 10 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Based on these findings, the total treatment time may be reduced by 3 months with the use of A-PRF and SACBAs for two-stage MSA.

8 January 2021 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFanni Minya
Fanni Minya
BTBálint Trimmel
Bálint Trimmel
LSLaszlo Simonffy
Laszlo Simonffy
SGSzabolcs Gyulai-Gaal
Szabolcs Gyulai-Gaal
Zsombor LaczaZsombor Lacza
Zsombor Lacza
Csaba Dobo-NagyCsaba Dobo-Nagy
Csaba Dobo-Nagy
Alveolar preservation can minimize bone resorption after tooth removal and additional topical antibiotics might also be considered. The goal of this study was to observe alveolar preservation with albumin and gentamycin-coated allograft compared to unfilled control sockets after mandibular third molar removal. Twenty-two patients were involved, 11 in the control group and 11 in the test group. CBCT analysis and micromorphometric analysis were performed. After one year, graft integration was observed with remaining graft particles. Micromorphometric analysis showed increased density and lower trabeculae formation in the grafted group. The buccal height reduction of the alveolar ridge was significantly lower when alveolar preservation was applied (control: 2.54 ± 2.01 mm, graft: 1.37 ± 1.04 mm, p < 0.05). Horizontal bone loss prevention was not significant. At the distal site of the second molar, the marginal bone level (MBL) was significantly lower in the control group. At the control group, five pockets persisted from the eight initial and all healed in the graft group. Alveolar preservation improves bone formation, helps to preserve the buccal bone crest, and minimizes MBL loss and pocket formation on the adjacent teeth. Thus, it needs to be also considered after third molar surgical removal.

18 December 2022 in Fogorvosi Szemle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMajor Martin
Major Martin
BTBálint Trimmel
Bálint Trimmel
MPMelinda Polyák
Melinda Polyák
DKDávid Kovács
Dávid Kovács
GSGyörgy Szabó
György Szabó
A PRF (Platelet Rich Fibrin) előállításának módszerét 2000-ben dolgozták ki, a trombocyta koncentrátumok második generációjához tartozik. Számos klinikai vizsgálat igazolta hatékonyságát, kombinálva különböző csontpótló anyagokkal.Elkészítéséhez a páciens saját vérét, alvadásgátló hozzáadása nélkül a kidolgozott protokoll szerint centrifugálják. A fo- lyamateredményeként leukocytákban és trombocytákban gazdag fibrin-alvadék nyerhető, mely extracelluláris mátrixként szolgál. A fehérvérsejtek és vérlemezkék növekedési faktorai lassan (2–3 hét) szabadulnak fel, így kedvezően befolyásolják a sebgyógyulást. A szerzők áttekintik a főbb irodalmi adatokat, és beszámolnak a PRF fogászati, dentoalveoláris és maxilofaciális sebészeti alkalmazásának lehetőségeiről (implantológia, csontpótlás, dentoalveoláris sebészet, parodontológia, arcüregzárás, sinus elevatio, osteonecrosis, endodontia).