The African continent is probably the one with the lowest density of hydrometric stations currently measuring river discharge despite the fact that the number of operating stations was quite important until the 1970s. This new African Database of Hydrometric Indices (ADHI) provides a wide range of hydrometric indices and hydrological signatures computed from different sources of data after a quality control. It includes 1466 stations with at least 10 years of daily discharge data over the period 1950–2018. The average record length is 33 years, and 131 stations have complete records over 50 years. With this new dataset spanning most climatic regions of the African continent, several hydrometric indices have been computed, representing mean flow characteristics and extremes (low flows and floods), and are accessible to the scientific community. The database will be updated on a regular basis to include more hydrometric stations and longer time series of river discharge. The ADHI is available for download at: https://doi.org/10.23708/LXGXQ9 (Tramblay and Rouché, 2020).
Analyzing trends of annual rainfall and assessing the impacts of these trends on the hydrological regime are crucial in the context of climate change and increasing water use. This research investigates the recent trend of hydroclimatic variables in the Senegal River basin based on 36 rain gauge stations and three hydrometric stations not influenced by hydraulic structures. The Man Kendall and Pettitt’s tests were applied for the annual rainfall time series from 1940 to 2013 to detect the shift and the general trend of the annual rainfall. In addition, trends of average annual flow rate (AAFR), maximum daily flow (MADF), and low flow rate (LFR) were evaluated before and after annual rainfall shift. The results show that the first shift is situated on average at 1969 whereas the second one is at 1994. While the first shift is very consistent between stations (between 1966 and 1972), there is a significant dispersion of the second change-point between 1984 and 2002. After the second shift (1994), an increase of annual rainfall is noticed compared to the previous period (1969–1994) which indicates a not significant, partial rainfall recovery at the basin level. The relative changes of hydrologic variables differ based on the variables and the sub-basin. Relative changes before and after first change-point are significantly negative for all variables. The highest relative changes are observed for the AAFR. Considering the periods before and second shifts, the relative changes are mainly significantly positive except for the LFR.
Les années humides de la décennie 1990 ont réduit l'extension de la zone touchée par la sécheresse. Mais des études ont montré que le déficit pluviométrique a persisté dans les régions sahéliennes jusqu'à la fin de la décennie 1990. Face aux évolutions en cours, P. OZER et al. considèrent, en 2003, que la continuité de la période de sécheresse, ou au contraire l'identification d'une rupture pluviométrique vers des conditions plus humides, ne pourra se vérifier statistiquement qu'après dix années de données supplémentaires. C'est dans cette perspective que se situe le présent travail, qui a pour objectif d'analyser la tendance récente des séries pluviométriques annuelles de vingt deux stations réparties sur le territoire sénégalais, avec des données collectées jusqu'en 2013, afin de juger de la persistance ou non de la sécheresse. Les données couvrent la période 1940-2013 et l'approche adoptée comporte les opérations suivantes : (1) critique et comblement des données lacunaires, (2) calcul des indices de pluie standardisés, (3) détection des ruptures au sein des séries pluviométriques par l'application de trois tests (PETTITT, LEE et HEGHINIAN, HUBERT). L'application de ces différents tests aux indices de pluie standardisés (IPS) calculés à partir de l'ensemble des stations et à partir des stations regroupées en fonction de trois zones climatiques (sud-sahélienne, sud-soudanienne et nord-soudanienne) montre deux ruptures (significatives au seuil de 1 % selon t test de STUDENT). La première est comprise entre 1967 et 1969, tandis que la seconde se situe entre 1986 et 1998 selon le test de PETTITT et entre 1992 et 2007 selon les méthodes de LEE et HEGHINIAN et de HUBERT. En analysant chacune des stations, on constate que la seconde rupture se situe en général entre 1998 et 2002. Seule la méthode de segmentation de HUBERT ne détecte pas toujours de seconde rupture, mais l'absence de détection concerne 18 % des stations seulement. On identifie donc une discontinuité vers des conditions humides depuis 1999 (PETTITT) ou 2003 (LEE et HEGHINIAN ; HUBERT), même si les précipitations annuelles restent inférieures à celles d'avant 1970.
This research investigated the effect of climate change on the two main river basins of Senegal in West Africa: the Senegal and Gambia River Basins. We used downscaled projected future rainfall and potential evapotranspiration based on projected temperature from six General Circulation Models (CanESM2, CNRM, CSIRO, HadGEM2-CC, HadGEM2-ES, and MIROC5) and two scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) to force the GR4J model. The GR4J model was calibrated and validated using observed daily rainfall, potential evapotranspiration from observed daily temperature, and streamflow data. For the cross-validation, two periods for each river basin were considered: 1961–1982 and 1983–2004 for the Senegal River Basin at Bafing Makana, and 1969–1985 and 1986–2000 for the Gambia River Basin at Mako. Model efficiency is evaluated using a multi-criteria function (Fagg) which aggregates Nash and Sutcliffe criteria, cumulative volume error, and mean volume error. Alternating periods of simulation for calibration and validation were used. This process allows us to choose the parameters that best reflect the rainfall-runoff relationship. Once the model was calibrated and validated, we simulated streamflow at Bafing Makana and Mako stations in the near future at a daily scale. The characteristic flow rates were calculated to evaluate their possible evolution under the projected climate scenarios at the 2050 horizon. For the near future (2050 horizon), compared to the 1971–2000 reference period, results showed that for both river basins, multi-model ensemble predicted a decrease of annual streamflow from 8% (Senegal River Basin) to 22% (Gambia River Basin) under the RCP4.5 scenario. Under the RCP8.5 scenario, the decrease is more pronounced: 16% (Senegal River Basin) and 26% (Gambia River Basin). The Gambia River Basin will be more affected by the climate change.
5 July 2018 in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Urbanization resulting from sharply increasing demographic pressure and infrastructure development has made the populations of many tropical areas more vulnerable to extreme rainfall hazards. Characterizing extreme rainfall distribution in a coherent way in space and time is thus becoming an overarching need that requires using appropriate models of intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves. Using a 14 series of 5 min rainfall records collected in Senegal, a comparison of two generalized extreme value (GEV) and scaling models is carried out, resulting in the selection of the more parsimonious one (four parameters), as the recommended model for use. A bootstrap approach is proposed to compute the uncertainty associated with the estimation of these four parameters and of the related rainfall return levels for durations ranging from 1 to 24 h. This study confirms previous works showing that simple scaling holds for characterizing the temporal scaling of extreme rainfall in tropical regions such as sub-Saharan Africa. It further provides confidence intervals for the parameter estimates and shows that the uncertainty linked to the estimation of the GEV parameters is 3 to 4 times larger than the uncertainty linked to the inference of the scaling parameter. From this model, maps of IDF parameters over Senegal are produced, providing a spatial vision of their organization over the country, with a north to south gradient for the location and scale parameters of the GEV. An influence of the distance from the ocean was found for the scaling parameter. It is acknowledged in conclusion that climate change renders the inference of IDF curves sensitive to increasing non-stationarity effects, which requires warning end-users that such tools should be used with care and discernment.