Sue-Ling Chang

Ms. Sue-Ling Chang

CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 October 2020 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KEKaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
Kaoutar Ennour-Idrissi
DDDzevka Dragic
Dzevka Dragic
EIElissar Issa
Elissar Issa
AMAnnick Michaud
Annick Michaud
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
CDCaroline Diorio
Caroline Diorio
Differential DNA methylation is a potential marker of breast cancer risk. Few studies have investigated DNA methylation changes in normal breast tissue and were largely confounded by cancer field effects. To detect methylation changes in normal breast epithelium that are causally associated with breast cancer occurrence, we used a nested case–control study design based on a prospective cohort of patients diagnosed with a primary invasive hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Twenty patients diagnosed with a contralateral breast cancer (CBC) were matched (1:1) with 20 patients who did not develop a CBC on relevant risk factors. Differentially methylated Cytosine-phosphate-Guanines (CpGs) and regions in normal breast epithelium were identified using an epigenome-wide DNA methylation assay and robust linear regressions. Analyses were replicated in two independent sets of normal breast tissue and blood. We identified 7315 CpGs (FDR < 0.05), 52 passing strict Bonferroni correction (p < 1.22 × 10−7) and 43 mapping to known genes involved in metabolic diseases with significant enrichment (p < 0.01) of pathways involving fatty acids metabolic processes. Four differentially methylated genes were detected in both site-specific and regions analyses (LHX2, TFAP2B, JAKMIP1, SEPT9), and three genes overlapped all three datasets (POM121L2, KCNQ1, CLEC4C). Once validated, the seven differentially methylated genes distinguishing women who developed and who did not develop a sporadic breast cancer could be used to enhance breast cancer risk-stratification, and allow implementation of targeted screening and preventive strategies that would ultimately improve breast cancer prognosis.

4 April 2024 in Burns
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NCNaomi Hope Chouinard
Naomi Hope Chouinard
CCChanel Beaudoin Cloutier
Chanel Beaudoin Cloutier
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
FSFélix H. Savoie-White
Félix H. Savoie-White
PLPhilippe Lachapelle
Philippe Lachapelle
JGJason Robert GUERTIN
Jason Robert GUERTIN
Burn injuries pose a significant burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Yet, costs arising from the consumption of resources by these patients are rarely examined in Canada. The objective of this study was to assess real-world costs resulting from the initial hospitalization of patients admitted to a major burn unit in Quebec, Canada. A cost study based on a retrospective cohort was undertaken using in-hospital economic data matched to hospital chart data. Our cohort included all burn-injured patients admitted between April 1, 2017, and March 31, 2021, to the hospital's major burn unit during their initial hospitalization. Descriptive statistics were tabulated for sociodemographic and economic data. Costing data were analyzed unstratified and stratified according to burn severity (i.e., ≥ 20% of total body surface area [TBSA] vs. < 20%). Costs were presented in CAD 2021. Our cohort included 362 patients, including 65 (18%) with TBSA ≥ 20%. The average initial hospitalization cost was $32,360 ($22,783 for < 20% TBSA and $76,121 for ≥ 20% TBSA). Findings reveal that the total cost of the initial hospitalization, from a public hospital perspective, was $11,714,348. Our study underlines the substantial burden associated with burns and highlights the need for long-term cost evaluations.

29 February 2024 in Journal of Burn Care & Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NCNaomi Hope Chouinard
Naomi Hope Chouinard
DSDavaine Joel Ndongo Sonfack
Davaine Joel Ndongo Sonfack
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
FBFrederic Bergeron
Frederic Bergeron
CCChanel Beaudoin Cloutier
Chanel Beaudoin Cloutier
JGJason Robert GUERTIN
Jason Robert GUERTIN
Our systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among parents within 12 months of their child’s burn injury. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Psychinfo, and CINAHL on January 6, 2023, for quantitative studies reporting the prevalence of PTSD and/or PTSS in parents within 12 months following their child’s burn injury. The risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018. A narrative synthesis of prevalence was presented. We identified 15 articles that met our inclusion criteria. The prevalence of PTSS within 12 months following the burn injury ranged from 6% to 49%. Prevalence estimates of PTSD within the 12 months following a burn injury were limited, ranging from 4.4% to 22%. Our findings highlight the significant impact of burn injuries on parental mental health, with a considerable proportion of parents experiencing PTSS within 12 months following their child’s burn injury. Prevalence estimates for PTSD were limited and warrant further investigation. Our review also underscores the need for standardization of PTSS/PTSD terminology. Timely and targeted psychological support is needed for parents in the aftermath of their child’s burn injury.

13 August 2021 in Journal of Obesity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
ATAndré Tchernof
André Tchernof
FDFrancine Durocher
Francine Durocher
CDCaroline Diorio
Caroline Diorio
Background. Mechanisms underlying the obesity-breast cancer link involve inflammation but need to be elucidated. Determining obesity by combining body mass index (BMI) with the waist circumference (WC) may clarify the role of inflammatory and hormonally related markers in breast cancer. We examined the effect of combining adiposity indices (BMI/WC) with the gene expression of several biomarkers involved in breast cancer. Methods. Expression of cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1 (CYP19A1), estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α), allograft inflammatory factor 1 (AIF1), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and leptin (LEP) in 141 adipose breast tissues was quantified using qPCR method. BMI and WC were measured by a trained nurse and categorized using the median split, BMILOWCLO, BMILOWCHI, BMIHIWCLO, and BMIHIWCHI. Results. Gene expression of IL-6 (3-fold), TNF-α (2-fold), and LEP (2-fold) was higher in the breast adipose tissue of women with high WC regardless of BMI, that is, BMILOWCHI and BMIHIWCHI women (all < 0.01). Compared to BMILOWCLO women, gene expression of CYP19A1, COX2, and AIF1 was increased by two-fold in breast adipose tissue of BMIHIWCHI women ( < 0.10). ER-α was not different across adiposity categories. Conclusions. The expression of some biomarkers, particularly those related to inflammation, is elevated in breast adipose tissue of women with a high WC independent of BMI. Obesity monitoring should also include women with normal or low BMI, but with central adiposity.

31 July 2025 in Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KCKatherine Cheung
Katherine Cheung
MBMaxwell Brodie
Maxwell Brodie
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
PDPierre Deschamps
Pierre Deschamps
JFJean-Sébastien Fallu
Jean-Sébastien Fallu
Yann JolyYann Joly
Yann Joly
Psychedelic treatment with psilocybin is receiving increased attention following clinical trials showing it may help treat end-of-life anxiety, depression, and several other conditions. Despite this, physicians may be reluctant to prescribe psilocybin and carry out psilocybin treatment because of the stigma surrounding psychedelics and the potential for medical malpractice liability. This paper explores whether psilocybin treatment gives rise to a risk of medical malpractice liability for physicians. Following an overview of psilocybin treatment and its regulatory regime in Canada, exploratory vignettes are used to highlight the relevance and limits of malpractice claims. This paper argues that the lack of established medical standards, standardized training, and credentialing contribute to liability risks surrounding psilocybin treatment. More clinical trials, meta-studies of research analyses, and knowledge sharing will help to develop training programs and medical standards of practice to better realize psilocybin’s potential.

19 May 2026 in Palliative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LPLouis Plourde
Louis Plourde
SCSue-Ling Chang
Sue-Ling Chang
ONOlivia Nguyen
Olivia Nguyen
NGNicolas Garel
Nicolas Garel
HFHouman Farzin
Houman Farzin
MDMichel Dorval
Michel Dorval
Background: While the adoption of psilocybin-assisted therapy for existential distress offers promising support for patients with life-threatening illnesses, implementing this intervention into palliative care settings presents significant real-world challenges. Aim: To examine palliative care stakeholders’ knowledge and attitudes regarding psilocybin-assisted therapy, and identify barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between April 15 and December 18, 2024. The survey assessed perceived knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers and facilitators to the effective integration of psilocybin-assisted therapy into palliative care settings. Setting/participants: One hundred and twenty-one adults involved in palliative care (physicians, other healthcare professionals, caregivers, and managers) were recruited from Canada’s four most populous provinces: Québec, Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia. Results: Forty-three percent of stakeholders reported having good knowledge of psilocybin’s potential benefits and risks. Attitudes towards psilocybin-assisted therapy were predominantly non-favourable (61%), yet varied across occupational groups ( p < 0.0001), with 95% of physicians reporting favourable attitudes. The lack of trained healthcare providers was viewed as the primary barrier to implementation. Key facilitators included further research and developing standardised intervention protocols. Sixty-eight percent of stakeholders endorsed the introduction of psilocybin-assisted therapy during the early stages of the illness trajectory. Conclusions: Translating the potential of psilocybin-assisted therapy for existential distress from clinical trials into palliative care settings requires careful consideration and collaboration with stakeholders. Given the significant divergence in perspectives between clinical and non-clinical groups, tailored interprofessional education could help build shared understanding and support effective implementation. Being conducted in Canada, transferability to different regulatory frameworks may be limited.