Alexandru Iordan

Dr. Alexandru Iordan

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 May 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RBRotem Botvinik-Nezer
Rotem Botvinik-Nezer
FHFelix Holzmeister
Felix Holzmeister
CCColin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer
ADAnna Dreber
Anna Dreber
JHJuergen Huber
Juergen Huber
TSTom Schonberg
Tom Schonberg

1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAlexandru Iordan
Alexandru Iordan
SDSanda Dolcos
Sanda Dolcos
FDFlorin Dolcos
Florin Dolcos
Prompt responses to emotional, potentially threatening, stimuli are supported by neural mechanisms that allow for privileged access of emotional information to processing resources. The existence of these mechanisms can also make emotional stimuli potent distracters, particularly when task-irrelevant. The ability to deploy cognitive control in order to cope with emotional distraction is essential for adaptive behavior, while reduced control may lead to enhanced emotional distractibility, which is often a hallmark of affective disorders. Evidence suggests that increased susceptibility to emotional distraction is linked to changes in the processing of emotional information that affect both the basic response to and coping with emotional distraction, but the neural correlates of these phenomena are not clear. The present review discusses emerging evidence from brain imaging studies addressing these issues, and highlights the following three aspects. First, the response to emotional distraction is associated with opposing patterns of activity in a ventral “hot” affective system (HotEmo, showing increased activity) and a dorsal “cold” executive system (ColdEx, showing decreased activity). Second, coping with emotional distraction involves top–down control in order to counteract the bottom-up influence of emotional distraction, and involves interactions between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. Third, both the response to and coping with emotional distraction are influenced by individual differences affecting emotional sensitivity and distractibility, which are linked to alterations of both HotEmo and ColdEx neural systems. Collectively, the available evidence identifies specific neural signatures of the response to emotional challenge, which are fundamental to understanding the mechanisms of emotion-cognition interactions in healthy functioning, and the changes linked to individual variation in emotional distractibility and susceptibility to affective disorders.

4 January 2018 in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAlexandru Iordan
Alexandru Iordan
KCKatherine A. Cooke
Katherine A. Cooke
KMKyle D. Moored
Kyle D. Moored
BKBenjamin Katz
Benjamin Katz
MBMartin Buschkuehl
Martin Buschkuehl
PRPatricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Growing evidence suggests that healthy aging affects the configuration of large-scale functional brain networks. This includes reducing network modularity and local efficiency. However, the stability of these effects over time and their potential role in learning remain poorly understood. The goal of the present study was to further clarify previously reported age effects on “resting-state” networks, to test their reliability over time, and to assess their relation to subsequent learning during training. Resting-state fMRI data from 23 young (YA) and 20 older adults (OA) were acquired in 2 sessions 2 weeks apart. Graph-theoretic analyses identified both consistencies in network structure and differences in module composition between YA and OA, suggesting topological changes and less stability of functional network configuration with aging. Brain-wide, OA showed lower modularity and local efficiency compared to YA, consistent with the idea of age-related functional dedifferentiation, and these effects were replicable over time. At the level of individual networks, OA consistently showed greater participation and lower local efficiency and within-network connectivity in the cingulo-opercular network, as well as lower intra-network connectivity in the default-mode network and greater participation of the somato-sensorimotor network, suggesting age-related differential effects at the level of specialized brain modules. Finally, brain-wide network properties showed associations, albeit limited, with learning rates, as assessed with 10 days of computerized working memory training administered after the resting-state sessions, suggesting that baseline network configuration may influence subsequent learning outcomes. Identification of neural mechanisms associated with learning-induced plasticity is important for further clarifying whether and how such changes predict the magnitude and maintenance of training gains, as well as the extent and limits of cognitive transfer in both younger and older adults.

1 January 2013 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFlorin Dolcos
Florin Dolcos
AIAlexandru Iordan
Alexandru Iordan
JKJames Kragel
James Kragel
JSJared Stokes
Jared Stokes
RCRyan Campbell
Ryan Campbell
RCRoberto Cabeza
Roberto Cabeza
A fundamental question in the emotional memory literature is why emotion enhances memory in some conditions but disrupts memory in other conditions. For example, separate studies have shown that emotional stimuli tend to be better remembered in long-term episodic memory (EM), whereas emotional distracters tend to impair working memory (WM) maintenance. The first goal of this study was to directly compare the neural correlates of EM enhancement (EME) and WM impairing (WMI) effects, and the second goal was to explore individual differences in these mechanisms. During event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants maintained faces in WM while being distracted by emotional or neutral pictures presented during the delay period. EM for the distracting pictures was tested after scanning and was used to identify successful encoding activity for the picture distracters. The first goal yielded two findings: (1) emotional pictures that disrupted face WM but enhanced subsequent EM were associated with increased amygdala (AMY) and hippocampal activity (ventral system) coupled with reduced dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) activity (dorsal system); (2) trials in which emotion enhanced EM without disrupting WM were associated with increased ventrolateral PFC activity. The ventral-dorsal switch can explain EME and WMI, while the ventrolateral PFC effect suggests a coping mechanism. The second goal yielded two additional findings: (3) participants who were more susceptible to WMI showed greater amygdala increases and PFC reductions; (4) AMY activity increased and dlPFC activity decreased with measures of attentional impulsivity. Taken together, these results clarify the mechanisms linking the enhancing and impairing effects of emotion on memory, and provide insights into the role of individual differences in the impact of emotional distraction.

1 August 2020 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AIAlexandru Iordan
Alexandru Iordan
KCKatherine A. Cooke
Katherine A. Cooke
KMKyle D. Moored
Kyle D. Moored
BKBenjamin Katz
Benjamin Katz
MBMartin Buschkuehl
Martin Buschkuehl
PRPatricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz
Brain activity typically increases with increasing working memory (WM) load, regardless of age, before reaching an apparent ceiling. However, older adults exhibit greater brain activity and reach ceiling at lower loads than younger adults, possibly reflecting compensation at lower loads and dysfunction at higher loads. We hypothesized that WM training would bolster neural efficiency, such that the activation peak would shift towards higher memory loads after training. Pre-training, older adults showed greater recruitment of the WM network than younger adults across all loads, with decline at the highest load. Ten days of adaptive training on a verbal WM task improved performance and led to greater brain responsiveness at higher loads for both groups. For older adults the activation peak shifted rightward towards higher loads. Finally, training increased task-related functional connectivity in older adults, both within the WM network and between this task-positive network and the task-negative/default-mode network. These results provide new evidence for functional plasticity with training in older adults and identify a potential signature of improvement at the neural level.

4 February 2022 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AIAlexandru Iordan
Alexandru Iordan
SRShannon Ryan
Shannon Ryan
TTTroy Tyszkowski
Troy Tyszkowski
SPScott J Peltier
Scott J Peltier
ARAnnalise Rahman-Filipiak
Annalise Rahman-Filipiak
BHBenjamin M Hampstead
Benjamin M Hampstead
Spatial navigation is essential for everyday life and relies on complex network-level interactions. Recent evidence suggests that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can influence the activity of large-scale functional brain networks. We characterized brain-wide changes in functional network segregation (i.e. the balance of within vs. between-network connectivity strength) induced by high-definition (HD) tDCS in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) during virtual spatial navigation. Twenty patients with MCI and 22 cognitively intact older adults (healthy controls—HC) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging following two counterbalanced HD-tDCS sessions (one active, one sham) that targeted the right parietal cortex (center anode at P2) and delivered 2 mA for 20 min. Compared to HC, MCI patients showed lower brain-wide network segregation following sham HD-tDCS. However, following active HD-tDCS, MCI patients’ network segregation increased to levels similar to those in HC, suggesting functional normalization. Follow-up analyses indicated that the increase in network segregation for MCI patients was driven by HD-tDCS effects on the “high-level”/association brain networks, in particular the dorsal-attention and default-mode networks. HD-tDCS over the right parietal cortex may normalize the segregation/integration balance of association networks during spatial navigation in MCI patients, highlighting its potential to restore brain activity in Alzheimer’s disease.