Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe

Dr. Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe

Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development (IOER)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 July 2014 in Landscape Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
UWUlrich Walz
Ulrich Walz
WWWolfgang Wende
Wolfgang Wende

29 November 2017 in Ecosystems and People
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
Ecosystem services (ESs) are influenced by use intensity. Arising disparities between supply and demand are often depending on spatial relationships. We propose to classify the spatial relations into six cases with regard to the relocation of resources to the affected groups of people. Based on these six cases, the paper also identifies the human contributions to service supply and transfer. The classification distinguishes between ‘local’ (supply and demand in the same area), ‘proximity’ (close natural transfer), ‘process’ (distant transfer by natural processes), ‘access’ (users can get to the ecosystem), ‘commodity’ (supply contributed and transfer carried out by market players), and ‘global’. For the several cases, specific scientific methods and different policy approaches are applicable. A crucial issue is how to deal with the actors who enable, maintain, and restrict ESs. Thus, considerations about landscape maintenance, conservation support, and private solutions are necessary. The contribution suggests a framework to analyse and improve the relationships concerned by uncovering mismatches between supply and demand. We use selected indicators to compare supply and demand in these relations. Four examples show the capability of the approach to limit the overuse of ecosystems and to maintain the according ESs.

27 March 2021 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
INIna Neumann
Ina Neumann
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
BPBrzoska Patrycia
Brzoska Patrycia
Jiří LoudaJiří Louda
Jiří Louda
OBOlaf Bastian
Olaf Bastian
The quality of life in our cities critically depends on the intelligent planning and shaping of urban living space, in particular urban nature. By providing a wide range of ecosystem services (ES), urban nature essentially contributes to the well-being of city dwellers and plays a major role in avoiding common diseases through its positive impact on physical and mental health. Health is one of the most important factors underlying human welfare and is, thus, vital to sustainable development. The ES of urban green space provide other social-cultural functions alongside public health, for example by fostering environmental justice and citizenship participation. Thus, they should always be considered when searching for solutions to urban problems. The aim of this research was to determine the impact of green areas in three selected cities on the health and well-being of people by self-reporting of green areas’ visitors. To this end, we posed the research question: which types and characteristics of urban green space are most appreciated by city dwellers? Based on our findings, we have drawn up recommendations for practices to promote better living conditions. We have also pinpointed obstacles to and opportunities for leisure time activities as well as ways of supporting the public health of citizens.

9 May 2022 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ALAngela Lausch
Angela Lausch
XXXxx Xxx
Xxx Xxx
ASAndrew Skidmore
Andrew Skidmore
ECEusebiu Catana
Eusebiu Catana
LBLutz Bannehr
Lutz Bannehr
RBRoland Baatz
Roland Baatz
Remote sensing (RS) enables a cost-effective, extensive, continuous and standardized monitoring of traits and trait variations of geomorphology and its processes, from the local to the continental scale. To implement and better understand RS techniques and the spectral indicators derived from them in the monitoring of geomorphology, this paper presents a new perspective for the definition and recording of five characteristics of geomorphodiversity with RS, namely: geomorphic genesis diversity, geomorphic trait diversity, geomorphic structural diversity, geomorphic taxonomic diversity, and geomorphic functional diversity. In this respect, geomorphic trait diversity is the cornerstone and is essential for recording the other four characteristics using RS technologies. All five characteristics are discussed in detail in this paper and reinforced with numerous examples from various RS technologies. Methods for classifying the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity using RS, as well as the constraints of monitoring the diversity of geomorphology using RS, are discussed. RS-aided techniques that can be used for monitoring geomorphodiversity in regimes with changing land-use intensity are presented. Further, new approaches of geomorphic traits that enable the monitoring of geomorphodiversity through the valorisation of RS data from multiple missions are discussed as well as the ecosystem integrity approach. Likewise, the approach of monitoring the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity recording with RS is discussed, as are existing approaches for recording spectral geomorhic traits/ trait variation approach and indicators, along with approaches for assessing geomorphodiversity. It is shown that there is no comparable approach with which to define and record the five characteristics of geomorphodiversity using only RS data in the literature. Finally, the importance of the digitization process and the use of data science for research in the field of geomorphology in the 21st century is elucidated and discussed.

1 August 2013 in Ecological Indicators
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
EMElisa Michel
Elisa Michel
UWUlrich Walz
Ulrich Walz

14 May 2024 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dr. Ralf-Uwe SyrbeDr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
Dr. Ralf-Uwe Syrbe
SMSophie Meier
Sophie Meier
MMMichelle Moyzes
Michelle Moyzes
CDClaudia Anna Dworczyk
Claudia Anna Dworczyk
KGKarsten Grunewald
Karsten Grunewald
In densely built-up urban areas, green spaces such as gardens, parks, forests and water bodies can greatly enhance the quality of life for local residents and promote human health. These areas mitigate heat stress and the urban heat island effect to create a balanced local climate. To quantify the ecosystem service of “urban climate regulation” provided by urban green infrastructure, we developed a national indicator for specific measurement and monitoring. This indicator captures both the supply of climate-regulating services by urban green spaces and the demand for this service from the residential population. Using nationwide geodata, a cooling capacity value can be calculated that reflects the tree canopy, soil cover, sizes of green area and site characteristics. This cooling capacity value is then related to the affected residential population in the neighbourhood. Our analysis indicates that 76% of the population in the 165 case cities in Germany enjoy high or very high cooling capacities in their immediate living environment. In 37 cities, over 85% of the population benefits from good or very good cooling capacity provided by green space. The proposed indicator enables a comparison of the cooling service of urban green infrastructure and offers a sound basis for spatial planning and decision-making in urban areas.