Barbara Di Camillo

Prof. Barbara Di Camillo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2016 in Nature Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GBGiacomo Baruzzo
Giacomo Baruzzo
KHKatharina E Hayer
Katharina E Hayer
EKEun Ji Kim
Eun Ji Kim
BCBarbara Di Camillo
Barbara Di Camillo
GFGarret A FitzGerald
Garret A FitzGerald
GGGregory R Grant
Gregory R Grant

1 August 2020 in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEnrico Longato
Enrico Longato
Martina VettorettiMartina Vettoretti
Martina Vettoretti
BCBarbara Di Camillo
Barbara Di Camillo

28 March 2012 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMarco Falda
Marco Falda
STStefano Toppo
Stefano Toppo
APAlessandro Pescarolo
Alessandro Pescarolo
Enrico LavezzoEnrico Lavezzo
Enrico Lavezzo
BCBarbara Di Camillo
Barbara Di Camillo
PFPaolo Fontana
Paolo Fontana
Predicting protein function has become increasingly demanding in the era of next generation sequencing technology. The task to assign a curator-reviewed function to every single sequence is impracticable. Bioinformatics tools, easy to use and able to provide automatic and reliable annotations at a genomic scale, are necessary and urgent. In this scenario, the Gene Ontology has provided the means to standardize the annotation classification with a structured vocabulary which can be easily exploited by computational methods.

4 January 2018 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MEMarilena Paola Etna
Marilena Paola Etna
ASAlessandro Sinigaglia
Alessandro Sinigaglia
AGAngela Grassi
Angela Grassi
EGElena Giacomini
Elena Giacomini
ARAlessandra Romagnoli
Alessandra Romagnoli
ECEliana Coccia
Eliana Coccia
Autophagy is a primordial eukaryotic pathway, which provides the immune system with multiple mechanisms for the elimination of invading pathogens including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). As a consequence, Mtb has evolved different strategies to hijack the autophagy process. Given the crucial role of human primary dendritic cells (DC) in host immunity control, we characterized Mtb-DC interplay by studying the contribution of cellular microRNAs (miRNAs) in the post-transcriptional regulation of autophagy related genes. From the expression profile of de-regulated miRNAs obtained in Mtb-infected human DC, we identified 7 miRNAs whose expression was previously found to be altered in specimens of TB patients. Among them, gene ontology analysis showed that miR-155, miR-155* and miR-146a target mRNAs with a significant enrichment in biological processes linked to autophagy. Interestingly, miR-155 was significantly stimulated by live and virulent Mtb and enriched in polysome-associated RNA fraction, where actively translated mRNAs reside. The putative pair interaction among the E2 conjugating enzyme involved in LC3-lipidation and autophagosome formation-ATG3-and miR-155 arose by target prediction analysis, was confirmed by both luciferase reporter assay and Atg3 immunoblotting analysis of miR-155-transfected DC, which showed also a consistent Atg3 protein and LC3 lipidated form reduction. Late in infection, when miR-155 expression peaked, both the level of Atg3 and the number of LC3 puncta per cell (autophagosomes) decreased dramatically. In accordance, miR-155 silencing rescued autophagosome number in Mtb infected DC and enhanced autolysosome fusion, thereby supporting a previously unidentified role of the miR-155 as inhibitor of ATG3 expression. Taken together, our findings suggest how Mtb can manipulate cellular miRNA expression to regulate Atg3 for its own survival, and highlight the importance to develop novel therapeutic strategies against tuberculosis that would boost autophagy. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is one of the most successful pathogens in human history and remains the second leading cause of death from an infectious agent worldwide. The major reason of Mtb success relies on its ability to evade host immunity. Autophagy, a cellular mechanism involved in intracellular pathogen elimination, is one of the pathways hijacked by Mtb to elude the control of dendritic cells (DC), major cellular effectors of immune response. Recently, it has become clear that Mtb infection not only alters cellular gene expression, but also controls the level of small RNA molecules, namely microRNAs (miRNAs), which function as negative regulators of mRNA translation into protein. In the present study, we observed that the infection of human DC with Mtb leads to a strong induction of host miR-155, a critical regulator of host immune response. By mean of miR-155 induction, Mtb reduces Atg3 protein content, a crucial enzyme needed for the initial phase of the autophagic process. Interestingly, miR-155 silencing during Mtb infection restores Atg3 level and rescues autophagy. These findings contribute to better elucidate Mtb-triggered escape mechanisms and highlight the importance to develop host-directed therapies to combat tuberculosis based on autophagy boosting.

23 May 2017 in Frontiers in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAlessandra Dal Molin
Alessandra Dal Molin
GBGiacomo Baruzzo
Giacomo Baruzzo
BCBarbara Di Camillo
Barbara Di Camillo
The sequencing of the transcriptomes of single-cells or single-cell RNA-sequencing has now become the dominant technology for the identification of novel cell types or the study of stochastic gene expression. In recent years, various tools for analyzing single-cell RNA-sequencing data have been proposed, many of them with the purpose of performing differentially expression analysis. In this work, we compare four different tools for single-cell RNA-sequencing differential expression, together with two popular methods originally developed for the analysis of bulk RNA-sequencing data, but largely applied to single-cell data. We discuss results obtained in two real datasets and one synthetic dataset, along with considerations about the perspectives of single-cell differential expression analysis. In particular, we explore the methods performance in four different scenarios, mimicking different unimodal or bimodal distribution of the data, as characteristic of single-cell transcriptomics. We observe marked differences between the selected methods in terms of precision and recall, the number of detected differentially expressed genes and the overall performance. Globally, the results obtained in our study suggest that is difficult to identify a best performing tool and that efforts are needed to improve the methodologies for single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis and gain better accuracy of results.

31 January 2018 in Briefings in Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlessandra Dal Molin
Alessandra Dal Molin
BCBarbara Di Camillo
Barbara Di Camillo
The sequencing of the transcriptome of single cells, or single-cell RNA-sequencing, has now become the dominant technology for the identification of novel cell types in heterogeneous cell populations or for the study of stochastic gene expression. In recent years, various experimental methods and computational tools for analysing single-cell RNA-sequencing data have been proposed. However, most of them are tailored to different experimental designs or biological questions, and in many cases, their performance has not been benchmarked yet, thus increasing the difficulty for a researcher to choose the optimal single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) experiment and analysis workflow. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current available experimental and computational methods developed to handle single-cell RNA-sequencing data and, based on their peculiarities, we suggest possible analysis frameworks depending on specific experimental designs. Together, we propose an evaluation of challenges and open questions and future perspectives in the field. In particular, we go through the different steps of scRNA-seq experimental protocols such as cell isolation, messenger RNA capture, reverse transcription, amplification and use of quantitative standards such as spike-ins and Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs). We then analyse the current methodological challenges related to preprocessing, alignment, quantification, normalization, batch effect correction and methods to control for confounding effects.