In this paper we compared taxonomic results obtained by metataxonomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and metagenomics (whole shotgun metagenomic sequencing) to investigate their reliability for bacteria profiling, studying the chicken gut as a model system. The experimental conditions included two compartments of gastrointestinal tracts and two sampling times. We compared the relative abundance distributions obtained with the two sequencing strategies and then tested their capability to distinguish the experimental conditions. The results showed that 16S rRNA gene sequencing detects only part of the gut microbiota community revealed by shotgun sequencing. Specifically, when a sufficient number of reads is available, Shotgun sequencing has more power to identify less abundant taxa than 16S sequencing. Finally, we showed that the less abundant genera detected only by shotgun sequencing are biologically meaningful, being able to discriminate between the experimental conditions as much as the more abundant genera detected by both sequencing strategies.

COVID-19 represents the most severe global crisis to date whose public conversation can be studied in real time. To do so, we use a data set of over 350 million tweets and retweets posted by over 26 million English speaking Twitter users from January 13 to June 7, 2020. We characterize the retweet network to identify spontaneous clustering of users and the evolution of their interaction over time in relation to the pandemic’s emergence. We identify several stable clusters (super-communities), and are able to link them to international groups mainly involved in science and health topics, national elites, and political actors. The science- and health-related super-community received disproportionate attention early on during the pandemic, and was leading the discussion at the time. However, as the pandemic unfolded, the attention shifted towards both national elites and political actors, paralleled by the introduction of country-specific containment measures and the growing politicization of the debate. Scientific super-community remained present in the discussion, but experienced less reach and became more isolated within the network. Overall, the emerging network communities are characterized by an increased self-amplification and polarization. This makes it generally harder for information from international health organizations or scientific authorities to directly reach a broad audience through Twitter for prolonged time. These results may have implications for information dissemination along the unfolding of long-term events like epidemic diseases on a world-wide scale.

While the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic continues to strike and collect its death toll throughout the globe, as of 31 January 2021, the vaccine candidates worldwide were 292, of which 70 were in clinical testing. Several vaccines have been approved worldwide, and in particular, three have been so far authorized for use in the EU. Vaccination can be, in fact, an efficient way to mitigate the devastating effect of the pandemic and offer protection to some vulnerable strata of the population (i.e., the elderly) and reduce the social and economic burden of the current crisis. Regardless, a question is still open: after vaccination availability for the public, will vaccination campaigns be effective in reaching all the strata and a sufficient number of people in order to guarantee herd immunity? In other words: after we have it, will we be able to use it? Following the trends in vaccine hesitancy in recent years, there is a growing distrust of COVID-19 vaccinations. In addition, the online context and competition between pro- and anti-vaxxers show a trend in which anti-vaccination movements tend to capture the attention of those who are hesitant. Describing this context and analyzing its possible causes, what interventions or strategies could be effective to reduce COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? Will social media trend analysis be helpful in trying to solve this complex issue? Are there perspectives for an efficient implementation of COVID-19 vaccination coverage as well as for all the other vaccinations?

A previously unseen body of scientific knowledge of varying quality has been produced during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It has proven extremely difficult to navigate for experts and laymen alike, originating a phenomenon described as "Infodemic", a breeding ground for misinformation. This has a potential impact on vaccine hesitancy that must be considered in a situation where efficient vaccination campaigns are of the greatest importance. We aimed at describing the polarization and volumes of Italian language tweets in the months before and after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy. Tweets were sampled in the October 2020-January 2021 period. The characteristics of the dataset were analyzed after manual annotation as Anti-Vax, Pro-Vax and Neutral, which allowed for the definition of a polarity score for each tweet. Based on the annotated tweets, we could identify 29.6% of the 2,538 unique users as anti-Vax and 12.1% as pro-Vax, with a strong disagreement in annotation in 7.1% of the tweets. We observed a change in the proportion of retweets to anti-Vax and pro-Vax messages after the start of the vaccination campaign in Italy. Although the most shared tweets are those of opposite orientation, the most retweeted users are moderately polarized. Conclusions: The disagreement on the manual classification of tweets highlights a potential risk for misinterpretation of tweets among the general population. Our study reinforces the need to focus Public Health's attention on the new social media with the aim of increasing vaccine confidence, especially in the context of the current pandemic.

This scoping review summarizes current computational image analysis and artificial intelligence (AI) approaches for the assessment of hair and scalp disorders, with emphasis on quantitative trichoscopy and operator-independent evaluation. A deep Medline search was performed using a citation network-based approach using MeSH terms and complementary keywords covering diagnostic imaging, trichoscopy/videodermoscopy, image processing, algorithms, AI, and mobile/smartphone-based workflows. Overall, relatively few studies assess algorithms in real-world clinical pathways, and much of the retrieved literature is predominantly pre-clinical or methodology-driven. In parallel, commercially available AI-assisted trichoscopy platforms have little or no traceable peer-reviewed evidence; their validation methods and underlying datasets are often proprietary, undisclosed, and not directly comparable, limiting independent verification and cross-platform benchmarking. The most mature academic applications focus on follicular unit quantification (hair density, shaft diameter distribution, vellus-to-terminal ratio, and severity mapping), mainly using convolutional neural networks with object detection and instance segmentation. In conclusion, AI-assisted trichoscopy may support a shift toward standardized quantitative outputs, but clinical translation remains early and constrained by small or proprietary datasets, heterogeneous acquisition/annotation protocols, limited external validation, and scarce prospective studies.

Given that influenza vaccine effectiveness depends on a good antigenic match between the vaccine and circulating viruses, it is important to assess the antigenic properties of newly emerging variants continuously. With the increasing application of real-time pathogen genomic surveillance, a key question is if antigenic properties can reliably be predicted from influenza virus genomic information. Based on validated linked datasets of influenza virus genomic and wet lab experimental results, in silico models may be of use to learn to predict immune escape of variants of interest starting from the protein sequence only. In this study, we compared several machine-learning methods to reconstruct antigenic map coordinates for HA1 protein sequences of influenza A(H3N2) virus, to rank substitutions responsible for major antigenic changes, and to recognize variants with novel antigenic properties that may warrant future vaccine updates. Methods based on deep learning language models (BiLSTM and ProtBERT) and more classical approaches based solely on genetic distances and physicochemical properties of amino acid sequences had comparable performances over the coarser features of the map, but the first two performed better over fine-grained features like single amino acid-driven antigenic change and in silico deep mutational scanning experiments to rank the substitutions with the largest impact on antigenic properties. Given that the best performing model that produces protein embeddings is agnostic to the specific pathogen, the presented approach may be applicable to other pathogens.