Daniel Remondini

Prof. Daniel Remondini

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 February 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco DurazziFrancesco Durazzi
Francesco Durazzi
CSClaudia Sala
Claudia Sala
GCGastone Castellani
Gastone Castellani
GMGerardo Manfreda
Gerardo Manfreda
Daniel RemondiniDaniel Remondini
Daniel Remondini
ACAlessandra De Cesare
Alessandra De Cesare
In this paper we compared taxonomic results obtained by metataxonomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and metagenomics (whole shotgun metagenomic sequencing) to investigate their reliability for bacteria profiling, studying the chicken gut as a model system. The experimental conditions included two compartments of gastrointestinal tracts and two sampling times. We compared the relative abundance distributions obtained with the two sequencing strategies and then tested their capability to distinguish the experimental conditions. The results showed that 16S rRNA gene sequencing detects only part of the gut microbiota community revealed by shotgun sequencing. Specifically, when a sufficient number of reads is available, Shotgun sequencing has more power to identify less abundant taxa than 16S sequencing. Finally, we showed that the less abundant genera detected only by shotgun sequencing are biologically meaningful, being able to discriminate between the experimental conditions as much as the more abundant genera detected by both sequencing strategies.

20 January 2016 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMatteo Bersanelli
Matteo Bersanelli
EMEttore Mosca
Ettore Mosca
Daniel RemondiniDaniel Remondini
Daniel Remondini
EGEnrico Giampieri
Enrico Giampieri
CSClaudia Sala
Claudia Sala
LMLuciano Milanesi
Luciano Milanesi
Methods for the integrative analysis of multi-omics data are required to draw a more complete and accurate picture of the dynamics of molecular systems. The complexity of biological systems, the technological limits, the large number of biological variables and the relatively low number of biological samples make the analysis of multi-omics datasets a non-trivial problem. We review the most advanced strategies for integrating multi-omics datasets, focusing on mathematical and methodological aspects.

6 June 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGiulia Menichetti
Giulia Menichetti
Daniel RemondiniDaniel Remondini
Daniel Remondini
PPPietro Panzarasa
Pietro Panzarasa
RMRaúl J Mondragón
Raúl J Mondragón
Ginestra BianconiGinestra Bianconi
Ginestra Bianconi
One of the most important challenges in network science is to quantify the information encoded in complex network structures. Disentangling randomness from organizational principles is even more demanding when networks have a multiplex nature. Multiplex networks are multilayer systems of nodes that can be linked in multiple interacting and co-evolving layers. In these networks, relevant information might not be captured if the single layers were analyzed separately. Here we demonstrate that such partial analysis of layers fails to capture significant correlations between weights and topology of complex multiplex networks. To this end, we study two weighted multiplex co-authorship and citation networks involving the authors included in the American Physical Society. We show that in these networks weights are strongly correlated with multiplex structure, and provide empirical evidence in favor of the advantage of studying weighted measures of multiplex networks, such as multistrength and the inverse multiparticipation ratio. Finally, we introduce a theoretical framework based on the entropy of multiplex ensembles to quantify the information stored in multiplex networks that would remain undetected if the single layers were analyzed in isolation.

10 April 2021 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMatteo Bersanelli
Matteo Bersanelli
ETErica Travaglino
Erica Travaglino
MMManja Meggendorfer
Manja Meggendorfer
TMTommaso Matteuzzi
Tommaso Matteuzzi
CSClaudia Sala
Claudia Sala
MPMatteo Giovanni Della Porta
Matteo Giovanni Della Porta
PURPOSE: Recurrently mutated genes and chromosomal abnormalities have been identified in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We aim to integrate these genomic features into disease classification and prognostication. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 2,043 patients. Using Bayesian networks and Dirichlet processes, we combined mutations in 47 genes with cytogenetic abnormalities to identify genetic associations and subgroups. Random-effects Cox proportional hazards multistate modeling was used for developing prognostic models. An independent validation on 318 cases was performed. RESULTS: We identify eight MDS groups (clusters) according to specific genomic features. In five groups, dominant genomic features include splicing gene mutations ( SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1) that occur early in disease history, determine specific phenotypes, and drive disease evolution. These groups display different prognosis (groups with SF3B1 mutations being associated with better survival). Specific co-mutation patterns account for clinical heterogeneity within SF3B1- and SRSF2-related MDS. MDS with complex karyotype and/or TP53 gene abnormalities and MDS with acute leukemia–like mutations show poorest prognosis. MDS with 5q deletion are clustered into two distinct groups according to the number of mutated genes and/or presence of TP53 mutations. By integrating 63 clinical and genomic variables, we define a novel prognostic model that generates personally tailored predictions of survival. The predicted and observed outcomes correlate well in internal cross-validation and in an independent external cohort. This model substantially improves predictive accuracy of currently available prognostic tools. We have created a Web portal that allows outcome predictions to be generated for user-defined constellations of genomic and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Genomic landscape in MDS reveals distinct subgroups associated with specific clinical features and discrete patterns of evolution, providing a proof of concept for next-generation disease classification and prognosis.

25 August 2012 in AGE
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
gentilini davidegentilini davide
gentilini davide
DMDaniela Mari
Daniela Mari
DCDavide Castaldi
Davide Castaldi
Daniel RemondiniDaniel Remondini
Daniel Remondini
GOGiulia Ogliari
Giulia Ogliari
Giovanni VitaleGiovanni Vitale
Giovanni Vitale

11 March 2014 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MNMislav Novokmet
Mislav Novokmet
ELEdita Lukić
Edita Lukić
FVFrano Vučković
Frano Vučković
Ž–Željko –Durić
Željko –Durić
TKToma Keser
Toma Keser
Gordan LaucGordan Lauc
Gordan Lauc
Recovery after cardiac surgery is a complex process that has to compensate for both individual variability and extensive tissue damage in the context of systemic inflammation. Protein glycosylation is essential in many steps of the inflammatory cascade, but due to technological limitations the role of individual variation in glycosylation in systemic inflammation has not been addressed until now. We analysed composition of the total plasma and IgG N-glycomes in 107 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In nearly all individuals plasma N-glycome underwent the same pattern of changes in the first 72[emsp14]h, revealing a general mechanism of glycosylation changes. To the contrary, changes in the IgG glycome were very individualized. Bi-clustering analysis revealed the existence of four distinct patterns of changes. One of them, characterized by a rapid increase in galactosylated glycoforms, was associated with nearly double mortality risk measured by EuroSCORE II. Our results indicate that individual variation in IgG glycosylation changes during acute systemic inflammation associates with increased mortality risk and indicates new avenues for the development of personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approach.