Background: Although lenvatinib has become the standard therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the high incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) is an issue. This study aimed to clarify the AEs of lenvatinib and the therapeutic impact of five days-on/two days-off administration (i.e., weekends-off strategy) for lenvatinib. Methods: We retrospectively assessed the therapeutic effects and AEs of 135 patients treated with lenvatinib, and the improvement of tolerability and therapeutic efficacy of 30 patients treated with the weekends-off strategy. We also evaluated lenvatinib-induced vascular changes in tumors and healthy organs using a mouse hepatoma model. Results: The incidence rates of any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs were 82.1% and 49.6%. Fatigue was the most important AE since it resulted in dose reduction and discontinuation. Of the 30 patients who received weekends-off lenvatinib, 66.7% tolerated the AEs. Although 80.8% of the patients showed progression after dose reduction, the therapeutic response improved in 61.5% of the patients by weekends-off lenvatinib. Notably, weekends-off administration significantly prolonged the administration period and survival (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05). The mouse hepatoma model showed that weekends-off administration contributed to recovery of vascularity in the organs. Conclusion: Weekends-off administration of lenvatinib was useful to recover the therapeutic response and tolerability toward AEs.

Colorectal adenoma is linked to metabolic dysfunction. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has a precise definition and three subtypes, including non-obese MAFLD. We aimed to investigate the impact of MAFLD on the prevalence of colorectal adenoma by comparing it to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in health check-up examinees. This is a multicenter retrospective study. We enrolled 124 consecutive health check-up examinees who underwent colonoscopy. NAFLD and MAFLD were present in 58 and 63 examinees, respectively. Colorectal adenoma was diagnosed by biopsy. The impact of the MAFLD definition on the prevalence of colorectal adenoma was investigated by logistic regression, decision-tree, and random forest analyses. In logistic regression analysis, MAFLD was identified as the only independent factor associated with the presence of colorectal adenoma (OR 3.191; 95% CI 1.494–7.070; p = 0.003). MAFLD was also identified as the most important classifier for the presence of colorectal adenoma in decision-tree and random forest analyses (29 variable importance value). Among the three subtypes of MAFLD, non-obese MAFLD was the sole independent factor associated with the presence of colorectal adenoma (OR 3.351; 95% CI 1.589–7.262; p ≤ 0.001). Non-obese MAFLD was also the most important classifier for the presence of colorectal adenoma in decision-tree and random forest analyses (31 variable importance value). MAFLD, particularly non-obese MAFLD, is the most important factor associated with the presence of colorectal adenoma rather than NAFLD. Colonoscopy examination should be considered in patients with MAFLD, especially those who are non-obese.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The etiology of HCC has now dramatically changed from viral hepatitis to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). The main pathogenesis of MASLD-related HCC is the hepatic lipid accumulation of hepatocytes, which causes chronic inflammation and the subsequent progression of hepatic fibrosis. Chronic hepatic inflammation generates oxidative stress and DNA damage in hepatocytes, which contribute to genomic instability, resulting in the development of HCC. Several metabolic and molecular pathways are also linked to chronic inflammation and HCC in MASLD. In particular, the MAPK and PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathways are upregulated in MASLD, promoting the survival and proliferation of HCC cells. In addition, MASLD has been reported to enhance the development of HCC in patients with chronic viral hepatitis infection. Although there is no approved medication for MASLD besides resmetirom in the USA, there are some preventive strategies for the onset and progression of HCC. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, a class of medications, has been reported to exert anti-tumor effects on HCC by regulating metabolic reprogramming. Moreover, CD34-positive cell transplantation improves hepatic fibrosis by promoting intrahepatic angiogenesis and supplying various growth factors. Furthermore, exercise improves MASLD through an increase in energy consumption as well as changes in chemokines and myokines. In this review, we summarize the recent progress made in the pathogenic mechanisms of MASLD-associated HCC. Furthermore, we introduced new therapeutic strategies for preventing the development of HCC based on the pathogenesis of MASLD.

Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide and one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation. Moreover, patients with NAFLD frequently complain of non‐specific symptoms including fatigue, abdominal discomfort, as well as anxiety, and NAFLD is reported to affect patient‐reported outcomes (PROs). Thus, for clarifying the total burden of NAFLD, it is crucial to assess all associated outcomes, including not only clinical and economic outcomes but also PROs. PROs are thought to reflect what is happening in one's daily life and is an important way patients and health‐care professionals communicate. There are various instruments for the assessment of PROs. Recently, a NAFLD/non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)‐specific instrument called “Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ)‐NAFLD/NASH” has been developed. CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH comprises six domains: (i) abdominal symptoms, (ii) activity/energy, (iii) emotional health, (iv) fatigue, (v) systemic symptoms, and (vi) worry. CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH has demonstrated excellent internal consistency, face validity, content validity, and test–retest reliability. It has been sufficiently validated in two international phase 3 clinical trials. In this review, we summarize features of various instruments for assessing PROs by focusing on CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH. We also examine the validity of CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH in Japanese patients and alterations in CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH score in Japanese patients with significant hepatic fibrosis. Moreover, we discuss the utility of CLDQ‐NAFLD/NASH in phase 3 clinical trials and in a real‐world clinical setting.